World: r3wp
[I'm new] Ask any question, and a helpful person will try to answer.
older newer | first last |
Anton 15-Jul-2006 [376] | Surely French rebolers have dealt with sorting... Have you checked rebolfrance ? |
Normand 16-Jul-2006 [377] | Ill do. Thanks. |
BenK 18-Jul-2006 [378] | HNewbie here and considering purchasing View/Pro. Not rich so I was wondering, will I have to pay again when Rebol3 comes out? |
Gabriele 19-Jul-2006 [379] | licensing for R3 hasn't been discussed at all so far. you should probably ask your question to cindy at rebol dot com. |
Pekr 19-Jul-2006 [380x2] | isn't it preliminary to talk about licensing of R3, when even alpha was not posted? :-) |
(so we don't know much about architecture, I mean - e.g. language extensibility via plug-ins ..) | |
BenK 19-Jul-2006 [382] | I'll ask Cindy: only thing I wish to know is if DLL access is not free in R3 if there will be a (cheap) upgrade path for R2 licensees. |
james_nak 19-Jul-2006 [383] | BenK, I waited a real long time to purchase Pro/sdk but glad I did as I had a project come up that required binding my app into a simple to use .exe. |
BenK 19-Jul-2006 [384] | Well, I have no such requirements, no commercialisation of anything I write (it's just for my own and my family's use) so there's no way I can justify coughing up much money; just looking for the bare minimum I can get away with |
Henrik 19-Jul-2006 [385] | good question on the licensing. I'm also about to buy the SDK and it would be nice to know how much it's going to be worth until a 3.0 SDK comes out. |
BenK 19-Jul-2006 [386] | If Cindy answers, I'll pass it on here... |
BenK 24-Jul-2006 [387] | For thos einterested: just received e-mail from Cindy stating that there will be a (cheaper) upgrade path to R3 for R2 licensees, butno details available just yet. |
xavier 13-Jan-2007 [388] | . |
RayA 31-May-2007 [389] | G'day, |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [390] | hi :-) |
RayA 31-May-2007 [391] | I'm new to REBOL (discovered it by accident searching for internet operating systems) and was pleasantly surprised to discover this powerful language/environment with an active/passionate community. I'm not a programming guru, but would like to understand the language/environment and the types of applications it is good for (and not good for). So would anybody be able to point me to the "idiot's guide to REBOL"? Does REBOL provide architecture documentation/guidelines and/or frameworks for the development of scalable, fault tolerant, manageable, with hot code swapping for soft real-time 24x7 applications? Thank you in advance for your recommendations. |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [392x5] | heh, huh, tought questions :-) |
Well, you joined our community in the correct time, for us we are close, actually very close to change REBOL millenium. 1.June there will be REBOL 3 released to selected developers. REBOL 3 is BIG change in architecture, for the good of course! | |
We will get things like threading, most of the stuff is going to be open-sourced, we will be able to extend rebol by own components, modules will be available too, and many other changes. | |
For things that do exist: Resources: - http://www.rebol.com- corporate site, you will find docs linked there - http://www.rebol.net- developer's central. Sadly site was much more rich, but there was a server crash some time ago. But - still valuable rources - test releases, Carl's blogs, RAMBO bug database etc. | |
ah, and I forgot - http://www.rebol.org- script archive, mail list archive | |
RayA 31-May-2007 [397] | Good, I guess I can go straight to REBOL 3! Will there be documentation, tutorials, architectues, etc. etc? |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [398x4] | yes, of course, there should be. Part of the project is - DevBase, DocBase. DocBase is going to be based upon MediaWiki. I suggest you to install latest View release and then run Carl's DevCon slides. DevCon was held in Paris few weeks ago. Videos should be available shortly. |
http://www.rebol.com/notes/devcon07-carl.zip | |
R3 should be released to public July 15. Of course there will be some bugs to sort out, some things to finish, etc. In the meantime, you can study some docs - most things will stay valid. It is not change in philosophy, whole architecture will just get much stronger. | |
Now for some frameworks: | |
RayA 31-May-2007 [402] | Thank you for the links! I briefly saw some of the information, but not being a guru, I'm really looking for the "idiot's guide to REBOL" that gently introduces the reader to the power of REBOL through simple examples so I/others can "think deifferently" about programming and undo all the years of bad habits from other languages. |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [403x2] | We have XML-RPC for intercommunication, my guess is - not used much, but fine when you want to connect to server, which does use it. Rugby - RPC broker. VERY easy to use, you would be surprised! You simply start server, you define which functions you expose, something like server [my-func1 my-func2] and then you just connect. It uses functions stubs, so actually your source code is not revealed to client. |
REBOL/services - architecture developed by RT themselves, which will be part of every REBOL release, to standardise. You can find it via rebol.net IIRC. There are some docs, examples. It is not fully finished, it does not work if you are behind the proxy, and is not properly async, hence ppl work for R3 (which is async by default). Very strong concept, and once R3 is out, we will ruin other languages world via simplicity. You should also learn more about dialects, what they are, how those could be used, etc. | |
RayA 31-May-2007 [405] | I live in the East Bay of Northern California, and I'd be interested to meet REBOL developers/users in the area, if anybody is interested. Also, out of curiosity, where are the active developers located? |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [406x3] | Uniserve - multiplexing engine, kind of Medusa (Python). Uniserve engine is used for Cheyenne web server (look for that group here), and it is kind of cool web server, faster than Apache 1, fully REBOL based (well, who said scripting languages are slow? ;-), you don't need to install anything. It allows you to plug/unplug services when server is running! |
active developers? Here on AltME plus ML ... we are small community, but you mostly get your response/help in minutes/hours .... | |
also - in Rebol/View, start desktop and go to rebol.com site to see some tools, demos. Right clicking them you can get to its source code ... | |
RayA 31-May-2007 [409] | If you are are the norm, then this group is very responsive and helpful! Are developers using REBOL in there jobs or mostly in their spare time? |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [410] | some older resources - http://www.rebolforces.com/, weekly activity - http://rebolweek.blogspot.com/ |
RayA 31-May-2007 [411] | Are people many building tools for REBOL, or are they building "killer" applications? If so what types of applications or industry domains? |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [412x5] | mostly a spare time, but look at Carl's presentation - he sumes it up there too. There are few developers, doing REBOL full time: - few top developers present here work for RT on contractual basis. - there is a company called SafeWorlds (Reichart's company) - he employs tens of ppl IIRC. Their new system is http://qtask.com, front end is web 2.0, but whole back-end is REBOL based. - few developers working on their own - Henrik, Ashley, DocKimbel (mySQL, postgress cool protocols, Uniserve, Cheyenne) |
well, REBOL 2.0 generation allows mainly PITS (programming in the small). Some are building tools, or just some styles for View, then release to public. PPL do build applications, but I am not sure those are "killer" ones. E.g. AltME - secure from the very beginning, fine for your small team, but is that killer app? Hard to tell :-) | |
I forget few others, let me add them: | |
Graham - EMR system for doctors - http://synapsedirect.com/default.aspx Ashley - RebGUI - alternative gui system for View, less resource hundry, less free form, but more complete, fine docs! - http://www.dobeash.com/ Maxim - he does stuff, no one properly understands, he is kind of crazy, but we like him :-) Data Flow engines etc. Look for Still, Liquid, Elixir, etc. | |
and of course, there is one commercial system, which was nominated for Webby Awards in 2002(?), along with Google - REBOL IOS.Pity it is not supported much, but you still can buy it. With R3, altME, View and IOS concepts will merge, and what we will get will be kind of virtual OS ;-) | |
RayA 31-May-2007 [417x2] | I've "meet" Ashley, a very helpful Aussie who sang the praises of REBOL and got me conected to the Rebol3 world! So a big thanks to Ashley. |
It seems that the the time might be right to develop a "killer" application that leverages the power of REBOL3 ;-) | |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [419] | yeah, of course - any suggestion? :-) |
RayA 31-May-2007 [420] | Well actually I do, and the customers are ready for a major change, but the "killer" application must be scalable, fault tolerant, manageable, support hot code swapping, and by priced right. |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [421] | what kind of app are you about to build? Will you use also REBOL gui? Or a web front end? |
RayA 31-May-2007 [422] | I believe in Carl's vision "REBOL is perfect for lightweight distributed applications". Users need light-weight responsive gui clients that can work both online and offline. The evolution of the Web is moving (slowly) in this direction, with AJAX/Flash/JavaFX as examples of a more responsive and rich gui clients, BUT it's too complex and unreliable. The industry is adding kludge upon kludge to "fix" the problems resulting in further complexity and code bloat, but what is needed is a clean approach that captures the essence of what made the web a phenomal success in the first place - any body could set up/develop a web site and they did. Enterprise data centers need scalable, reliable, manageable (server) applications that run 24x7 on commodity hardware ata reasonable price. The user PC's should require zero management for the applications, which is the primary (only?) attraction of the web ui. Question if the application is simple to manage and delivers the functionality the user wants, why do they need a fat complex os? As an example my kids get online to play games, research homework, etc. and they hate it (so do I) when the PC/OS gets in the way. Also, that PC/OS is a major source of trouble with viruses and lack of (simple) control to what my kids can access. |
Pekr 31-May-2007 [423] | absolutly correct, and that is imo why you are here :-) |
Ashley 31-May-2007 [424] | re: tutorials. How about: http://musiclessonz.com/rebol_tutorial.html |
RayA 31-May-2007 [425] | Other examples. Google (and other NetSuite, etc) is developing suite of "microsoft office" online only applications, but I can only speculate they are working on how to make it also work offline as well. Microsoft is working on making office work on the web as SaaS (or S+S as their marketing refers to it), so the writing is on the wall. |
older newer | first last |