World: r3wp
[Make-doc] moving forward
| older newer | first last |
| shadwolf 11-Jan-2005 [119x3] | that will work as the same on every OS that rebol stand in ;) |
hoping to the 1.3 will not only be release for windows ... | |
eFishAnt for moving text if you arrive to a good solution send me a post thru altme I will integrate it asap into MDP-GUI that could be a good point to explaine to newbies how to influe dynamicly to default area text :) | |
| eFishAnt 11-Jan-2005 [122x2] | yes...I am still learning new things now rapidly without waiting....hmmn, enum2 is parsing, but the output is goofing. |
makedoc2.5 needs a little TLC (tender loving care...time for a sculpting massage.) | |
| shadwolf 11-Jan-2005 [124x3] | enum2 is done by #> texte |
lol | |
like all new things need it ;) | |
| eFishAnt 11-Jan-2005 [127x2] | does it work for you? |
#>text parses, but no output....but I could be doing something wrong...maybe it has to have a section or something first. | |
| shadwolf 11-Jan-2005 [129x3] | emit problem ? |
with debug on do you see it ? | |
the emit stage ... | |
| eFishAnt 11-Jan-2005 [132] | gen-html doesn't even have a tag for enum2 or enum3 (but have to study a bit more |
| shadwolf 11-Jan-2005 [133x2] | enum [emit-item doc enum <ol>] that's exacttly that |
gen-html knows enum and convert it to html flag but it doesn't knows enum2 and enul3 | |
| eFishAnt 11-Jan-2005 [135] | yes, agreed. |
| shadwolf 11-Jan-2005 [136x6] | so the problem you notice is due surely to a forgot implementation to enum2 and enum3 |
so need to add there the corresponding html flags for enum2 and enum3 | |
well good night efishant ai'm burned here it's ששט oclock in the morning see you later ;) | |
2.5.1 need to be done ;) | |
7 oclock here :) | |
7:42 am | |
| Henrik 11-Jan-2005 [142x2] | is it not possible to specify an output file in makedoc2 as an argument? |
seems not | |
| Robert 11-Jan-2005 [144x2] | code: My current make-doc-pro version supports including code with =include code <filename> and source-code will automatically indented to become example code. |
tables: What's not working at the moment? | |
| Henrik 11-Jan-2005 [146x2] | there seems to be some things missing (how to make bold and italic?) and I can't properly process multiple documents using makedoc2. the <html>, <body> and CSS code is only included in the first one, but not subsequent ones, if I 'load-only makedoc2 and follow the example shown in the source code. |
=include doesn't work either. | |
| Robert 11-Jan-2005 [148] | try MDP ;-)) it supports all of this. |
| Henrik 11-Jan-2005 [149x2] | I was migrating away from MDP so I could get more control over the output... seems it's not the case yet |
and about tables in MDP, are they completed? I can't get them working | |
| Robert 11-Jan-2005 [151x2] | What do you mean be "completed"? |
Here is an exmaple: | |
| Henrik 11-Jan-2005 [153] | I get one row of cells, if I follow the syntax in the example docs |
| Robert 11-Jan-2005 [154x2] | \table header Header 1 |Header2 |Header3 || Cell1 |Cell2 |Cell3 || Lastline withouth linetermination /table |
If you omitt the 'header word, the first line won't be formatted as header for the table. | |
| Henrik 11-Jan-2005 [156x4] | interesting |
thanks | |
looks like I'll stick with MDP for a while yet. makedoc2 seems a bit fishy to me... | |
robert: the manual doesn't mention anything about || at the end of the line, which is why I couldn't get them working | |
| Robert 11-Jan-2005 [160] | Really? I check it. Maybe MDP didn't emit the || characters. |
| Pekr 11-Jan-2005 [161] | ... so what is the aim of make-doc group as posted on rebol.net? Will there be any unified version, abstracted, so various output formats plus separate styling (e.g. for html) in .css would be possible? |
| Robert 11-Jan-2005 [162] | That's the idea... |
| PeterWood 11-Jan-2005 [163] | According to the official project page on rebol.net, Robert is one of the members of the Make-Doc standardisation project. So he should know. |
| Robert 11-Jan-2005 [164] | Ok, I already updated my local docs need to publish them on the server as well. |
| Pekr 11-Jan-2005 [165x2] | well, so what will be initial make-doc from which we will evolve? Make-doc 1.0? 2.5? IIRC MDP evolved from MD 1.0? |
the problem is I have various docs here and I don't like reformatting for myriads of version just to find out which look better ... | |
| Robert 11-Jan-2005 [167] | Yes, the thing is to first agree on the markup to use. But we didn't make it to get the mentioned people to start working together towards one solution. |
| Pekr 11-Jan-2005 [168] | but - I would definitely vote for =include command - both for code and another text file, so you would be able to construct more complex docs from smaller parts .... |
| older newer | first last |