World: r3wp
[Make-doc] moving forward
older newer | first last |
Geomol 31-Jan-2005 [419] | Like if you wanna write something in bold, you use <b>bold</b>. |
James 31-Jan-2005 [420] | Ah. This is where it pays off to know basic HTML. :) |
Geomol 31-Jan-2005 [421] | :) |
James 31-Jan-2005 [422] | Thanks! I'll have to do that. |
Geomol 31-Jan-2005 [423] | Problem is, if you wanna build a system to have other output than HTML. |
James 31-Jan-2005 [424x2] | True. That would be a little more difficult. |
What about layouts? Do those work the same? | |
Geomol 31-Jan-2005 [426] | I've written a MakeDoc2 summary. Look here: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicom-md2-spec.html |
James 31-Jan-2005 [427x2] | Cool. Now I have a reference! |
Thanks again. | |
Geomol 31-Jan-2005 [429] | You're welcome! |
shadwolf 1-Feb-2005 [430] | Geomol is right I had to add the parsing of =url flag into the Ashley MD2-IDE rendering process to adapt it to the MDP format |
Geomol 2-Feb-2005 [431x4] | I'm going on skivacation for a week, but I desided to put my work so far on the NicomDoc document format up on my website. It's NOT version 1.0 yet, so some features are not supported. I'll write a short specification in a moment. Parsing a NicomDoc document to HTML goes in two passes, first the raw document is converted to RebXML format. This is done by this script: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/nicomdoc.r Next the RebXML version is converted to HTML. This is done with this script: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/rebxml2html.r I've also made a little script, that will do the whole conversion in one go by calling the other scripts. It works much like calling makedoc2.r, and it can be found here: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/ndoc.r Those of you, who want to work with this format, e.g. make VID output, should work from the RebXML version of the document (after first parsing from raw document to RebXML with the first script), because this script handle all the complicated rules, so the RebXML version is much easier to work with. |
Specification here: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/NicomDoc.html Example of use: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/example.txt And the output: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/example.html | |
Notice! As this is not version 1.0 of NicomDoc, some things will probably change. The namespace might change. Example: I use 'p' for paragraph in the RebXML version to make it short (also if someone wants to make XML output, which is bloated), but I might change it to have a more saying name for a paragraph. And URL keyword might go away and be replaced by a more general term like a reference. | |
It's of course possible to make XML output of a NicomDoc document by first parsing it with nicomdoc.r and then use http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/rebxml/rebxml2xml.r on the RebXML version. And back again with http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/rebxml/xml2rebxml.r | |
Piotr 3-Feb-2005 [435] | wikiDoc = makeDoc with dokuwiki syntax; http://www.rowery.olsztyn.pl/wspolpraca/rebol/wikiDoc/ |
shadwolf 5-Feb-2005 [436x2] | and wiki rendering like to ... it's closer from IRC or chat or web php/forum it include Smyleys ;) |
It could be included to rebforum work As soon we restart working on it ... we are waiting for rendering for Ritch Text enhancement (TDM) to rework on it | |
eFishAnt 6-Feb-2005 [438x2] | I love the way makedoc2.r shows the out of place markups...so you can see why something didn't work...for example, if you do a # without the para...it shows the out of place # in the html |
makes it REAL easy to fix ML typos. | |
Henrik 13-Feb-2005 [440] | has there been any ways suggested with making colspans in tables? otherwise I would suggest a: \colspan col1 col2 col3 /colspan tag. Just build the table as normally and enclose the columns you want in a specific row with those tags. |
Geomol 13-Feb-2005 [441] | It's tricky to make tables easy to produce for the writer, and at the same time give opportunities to have colspan and rowspan. And do we have the need to have tables within tables? That'll just make it even more complicated. I guess, learning by doing is a good way to figure it out. (That's one idea behind my NicomDoc format. To try things out.) |
Henrik 13-Feb-2005 [442] | I suggested this, if tables were to continue with their current syntax in makedoc2. The syntax has the advantage, I think, that cell contents can be complex or almost an entire document in itself, but bigger tables are hard to overview in text. I don't think this tag will cause the current method to become that much more complex. |
DideC 13-Feb-2005 [443] | Do one knows why "=url" is not part of makedoc 2.6 (nor 2.5) ?? |
eFishAnt 18-Feb-2005 [444] | you can inline the HTML, I discovered... |
shadwolf 18-Feb-2005 [445] | sure but why the =url as been retire for it ? it simplifies the creation of links |
shadwolf 23-Feb-2005 [446x4] | brand new version of MDP-GUI 1.3.6 is available here: http://rebol.dev.fr/view.php?sid=151 |
what's new : - Better rendering images and tables support. Try to load the default make-doc-pro.txt that come with Make-Doc-Pro | |
to see all the parsing rendering improments | |
new link http://rebol.dev.fr/view.php?sid=152 | |
Robert 23-Feb-2005 [450] | Shadwolf, looks pretty cool!! Tables look very good. Is italic supported? |
shadwolf 23-Feb-2005 [451x7] | good question ;) |
marker parsing as MDP format or as HTML flags | |
are coded but I don't know if all are perfectly parsed;) | |
Underlined,blod are supported italic ~text~ is not supported | |
Has I forget toremove a disgracingprobe I can fix that too | |
k fixed ;) | |
http://rebol.dev.fr/view.php?sid=154 | |
shadwolf 27-Feb-2005 [458x2] | [MDP-GUI DEV NEWS ] I improved the rendering speed by 300% integrating the MDViewer rendering method that ASHLEY created. That new algorithm really rocks !!! I had to change the inline formating flags to conserv the most speed. I conserv the ashley way to deal with inline marcker has HTML tags (e.g: <b>text bold</b>) I adapt ashley's code for all little other différences that exist beetwin MD2 and MDP format. Next step is to enhance the toc rendering process. I remade the first start up process. I plan to give MDP-GUI.r, make-doc.r, make-doc.txt, ms-word.gif, in a single ZIP archive that make easier the release and use. As johnatemps says to me people wants to download and use and not try to configure the program durring lot of time. |
maybe later i will wrap all the zip package into a .exe file using grebox wrapper from shadwolf and spag' :) | |
Geomol 2-Mar-2005 [460] | New version of NicomDoc is out. It's still not v.1.0, so things will change. Specification: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/NicomDoc.html Example: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/example.html Example source: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/example.txt Main script (this is the one, you should run. Works like makedoc2.r.): http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/ndoc.r NicomDoc to RebXML script: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/nicomdoc.r RebXML to HTML 4.01 script: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/ndrebxml2html.r Changes from previous version are: simpler tables, better magic mode (rich text), better handling of paragraph states like centered text (won't effect the inner of e.g. tables), better handling of faulty input, tables within tables, same with notes (not sure, if you could that in previous version) ... and probably some more, I can't remember. You need atleast REBOL/Core 2.5.3, because of new break word within parse rules. So it won't work with official REBOL/View 1.2. Get a newer one! |
Micha 3-Mar-2005 [461] | how do to exchange on document html rebol ? |
Anton 3-Mar-2005 [462x2] | Micha, I do not understand. Please ask again another way? What is your native spoken language ? |
Oh, you mean "how to export a NicomDoc document --> html" ? | |
shadwolf 3-Mar-2005 [464] | according to micha's email I would say he is from polonia ;) |
DideC 3-Mar-2005 [465] | Poland not Polonia ;-) |
shadwolf 3-Mar-2005 [466] | oups sorry |
Anton 3-Mar-2005 [467] | Poland = Polonia ? |
shadwolf 3-Mar-2005 [468] | foreign countries names are not my best point :) |
older newer | first last |