r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Parse] Discussion of PARSE dialect

Graham
9-Feb-2009
[3477x2]
For those of Scottish descent, does this work for you?


fix-scots: func [ result /local rule][

    rule: [ thru " Mc" mark: skip ( uppercase/part skip result -1 + index? 
    mark 1) ]
    parse result [ some rule ]
    result
]
Or, are there some other funny capitalization rules I need to do?
Chris
9-Feb-2009
[3479]
Mc and Mac.
Steeve
9-Feb-2009
[3480]
uh !? what are those skips ???
Graham
9-Feb-2009
[3481x3]
But I see Macdonald ... and not MacDonald ..
skip not necessary ..
how do you decided whether it's MacDonald or Macdonald??
Steeve
9-Feb-2009
[3484]
indeed :)
Chris
9-Feb-2009
[3485x2]
I'd say MacDonald, but I'm not one, so don't know.
One side of my family have the convenient Ross, the other dropped 
the Mc to leave Gill (back in time somewhere)
Graham
9-Feb-2009
[3487x3]
They call it a big Mac not a big Mc ... odd
when it's McDonalds
I guess they're being inclusive
Chris
9-Feb-2009
[3490]
As far as I'm aware, Mc and Mac are interchangeable.
Graham
9-Feb-2009
[3491x2]
In legal documents? Interesting.
I'm grabbing my phone book ....
BrianH
9-Feb-2009
[3493]
My family switched away from the Scottish spelling too, back in the 
19th century when that branch came to the US.
Chris
9-Feb-2009
[3494]
Didn't say that, just usage.
BrianH
9-Feb-2009
[3495]
Each family picks one spelling and sticks with it nowadays, mostly 
because of those legal documents.
Graham
9-Feb-2009
[3496x2]
Yep, my phone book has the Macleans between the Mcleans
so the alphabetical ordering system they're using treats mc and mac 
the same
Chris
9-Feb-2009
[3498]
B: from what name?
BrianH
9-Feb-2009
[3499x2]
Phone book sorting - that's really complex :(
Halle
Chris
9-Feb-2009
[3501]
Sounds nordic...
BrianH
9-Feb-2009
[3502x2]
To Hawley, the English spelling. To reduce prejudice in the US.
It's old Celtic.
Graham
9-Feb-2009
[3504x2]
Apple MacIntosh ??
I think I'll skip Macs
Chris
9-Feb-2009
[3506]
As opposed to MacKintosh.
Steeve
9-Feb-2009
[3507]
you can't guess, you need the list of all clans :)
Janko
14-Feb-2009
[3508x4]
hi, it's me again with parse problems...  I need this concretely 
to parse out web-page meta tags.. but I distilled the problem out 
of it to a minimal example..
doc1: "start A 1 end start B 2 end"  how can you get value of  2 
out
It works with a because it's first , but becasuse it enters the "parse" 
with it and then doesn't match it doesn't again test the B 

>> parse doc1 [ "start" "A" copy R to "end" (print R) to end ]
 1
== true
>> parse doc1 [ "start" "B" copy R to "end" (print R) to end ]
== false
I thought it will recheck if I put it into something like SOME [ 
] but it doesn't 


parse doc1 [ SOME [ "start" "B" copy R to "end" (print R) to end 
] ]
kib2
14-Feb-2009
[3512]
Maybe ? parse/all doc1 [ thru "B" copy number to "end" (print number) 
]
But I'm beginning with parse, so I'm not an expert
Janko
14-Feb-2009
[3513x2]
This would work in this case but I need to get "2" only if sequence 
before it is exactly previous two "start" "B" XX "end" ...  there 
can be "B" in other places of the string and it musn't take that 
(I am used on using thru and to too but I musn't use them in this 
case for this reason as it might just skip to some "B"
>> doc1: "start A 1 end xyz B 2 end" ;; in this case it must not 
take 2
== "start A 1 end xyz B 2 end"

>> parse doc1 [ "start" thru "B" copy R to "end" (print R) to end 
] ;; but it will that's why I can't u
se to\thru
 2
== true
Anton
14-Feb-2009
[3515]
some ["start" ["A" | "B"] copy R to "end" "end"]
Janko
14-Feb-2009
[3516]
ups ... my example above is wrong .. just a sec
Anton
14-Feb-2009
[3517]
no, hang on...
Janko
14-Feb-2009
[3518x2]
Anton this would  return me 1 probably ?
(this is the right example .. I forgot to use thru above so second 
wouldn't pass anyway... but result is the same)

>> doc1: "start A 1 end start B 2 end"
== "start A 1 end start B 2 end"

>> parse doc1 [ thru "start" "A" copy R to "end" (print R) to end 
]
 1
== true

>> parse doc1 [ thru "start" "B" copy R to "end" (print R) to end 
]
== false

>> parse doc1 [ SOME [ thru "start" "B" copy R to "end" (print R) 
to end ] ]
== false
Anton
14-Feb-2009
[3520]
Is there anything expected between "start" and "A", for instance 
?
Janko
14-Feb-2009
[3521]
I know how to solve this by making it less robust (in this case relying 
that there is only one space between) but this doesn't solve my problem 
well 

>> parse doc1 [ thru "start B" copy R to "end" (print R) to end ]
 2
== true
Anton
14-Feb-2009
[3522]
No need for that.
Janko
14-Feb-2009
[3523]
1 or more spaces (to your question)
Anton
14-Feb-2009
[3524]
parse doc1 [some [thru "start" ["A" | "B"] copy R to "end" (?? R) 
"end"]]
Janko
14-Feb-2009
[3525]
hm.. just a sec so I try few things
Anton
14-Feb-2009
[3526]
PARSE without the /ALL refinement handles any amount of whitespace. 
(You will probably end up using parse/all, though. I usually do when 
parsing HTML.)