World: r3wp
[Parse] Discussion of PARSE dialect
older newer | first last |
Steeve 24-May-2010 [4980] | don't see your point, show us the annoying rule... |
florin 24-May-2010 [4981x5] | Ok, I will. The point is that I want to include the space in my rule. Here's the example: |
digits: charset "0123456789" ip: [some digits "." some digits "." some digits "." some digits ] | |
This finds the IP in the log entry. What if I have two ip addresses and I want to pick them at the same time: ip: [some digits "." some digits "." some digits "." some digits __space__ some digits ...etc] | |
And the IP addresses are separatered by a space? | |
My question really is, how do I escape the space character as one would in regular expressions? | |
Steeve 24-May-2010 [4986] | you need parse/all |
florin 24-May-2010 [4987] | correct, and then, how do you place the space in the rule: {} ? |
Steeve 24-May-2010 [4988x2] | #" " or " " or { } |
'space works too | |
Pekr 24-May-2010 [4990] | parse/all is really your friend - no unwanted surprises .... |
florin 24-May-2010 [4991] | That's it? 'space? That is easy. |
Steeve 24-May-2010 [4992] | sorry , it only exists in R3 |
florin 24-May-2010 [4993x2] | Yes, parse/all is great, and this is why I want to include the space not as a delimiter but as a character in the rule. As if, sometimes I want to find two strings separated by a character. |
So #" " should do. I will try it. Thank you. | |
Steeve 24-May-2010 [4995] | but you can make your own easly ;-) space: #" " |
PeterWood 24-May-2010 [4996] | >> a: "a b" == "a b" >> parse/all a ["a" " " "b"] == true |
florin 24-May-2010 [4997] | My script works, but you know how it goes. Once a question creeps in the brain, it needs an answer. Thank you. |
Pekr 24-May-2010 [4998] | I would use #" ", or defined a space rule first: spaces: charset " ^-" (eventually include tab) |
florin 24-May-2010 [4999] | Thank you all. |
Steeve 24-May-2010 [5000x2] | some space is even better to my mind |
some space is even better to my mind | |
Terry 24-May-2010 [5002] | >> spam: "[15/May/2010 17:59:56] IP address 190.101.1.10 found in DNS blacklist SpamHaus SBL-XBL..." == {[15/May/2010 17:59:56] IP address 190.101.1.10 found in DNS blacklist SpamHaus SBL-XBL...} >> replace/all spam "]" "" replace/all spam "[" "" == {15/May/2010 17:59:56 IP address 190.101.1.10 found in DNS blacklist SpamHaus SBL-XBL...} >> blk: parse/all spam " " == ["15/May/2010" "17:59:56" "IP" "address" "190.101.1.10" "found" "in" "DNS" "blacklist" "SpamHaus" "SBL-XBL..."] >> date: blk/1 == "15/May/2010" >> time: blk/2 == "17:59:56" >> ip: blk/5 == "190.101.1.10" |
Pekr 24-May-2010 [5003] | nice .... |
Steeve 24-May-2010 [5004] | trim/with "[]" is better to remove things... |
Terry 24-May-2010 [5005] | rebol and logs are like bread and butter |
Pekr 24-May-2010 [5006] | yeah ... I used it often ... read/lines is your friend :-) |
Steeve 24-May-2010 [5007] | yep nothing in the world can beat this combination |
Terry 24-May-2010 [5008] | Structured data like logs, but Rebol shines even when parsing unstructured data |
florin 24-May-2010 [5009x3] | Yep, this is my script to dig the IP's inside the log files. I was quiet excited to see how natural it was to write this: |
digits: charset "0123456789" ip: [some digits "." some digits "." some digits "." some digits ] newList: [] existingList: [] files: [] foreach file read %. [ if find file "security.log" [ split: parse read file none foreach it split [ parse it [[ip] (append newList it) ] ] ] ] | |
Then, I said, read only from the last read, and pare the date/time. I wanted to parse date AND time at the same time" [15/May/2010 17:59:56] But I hit a snag because of the space in between. I don't want date and time separater beause rebol can parse the string into a date-time easy. The space gave me trouble, and the brackets too. | |
Steeve 24-May-2010 [5012] | I would write th ip rule more strictly. ip: [1 3 digits 3 [#"." 1 3 digits]] |
florin 24-May-2010 [5013x3] | Using the charset did not work. So I did this: parse/all txt [thru "[" copy found to "]" ]. And said to myself, time to learn more and could not find resources. |
g so helpful. | |
Thanks. | |
Pekr 24-May-2010 [5016] | What is the problem in parsing date and time at the same time? I somehow don't understand, if the solution does what you need, or you need further help? |
Anton 24-May-2010 [5017] | lines: read/lines file foreach line lines [ ... ] |
florin 24-May-2010 [5018] | Pekr, I'm done. Thanks. Initially I could not figure out how to escape the space character. |
Ladislav 24-May-2010 [5019] | the funny thing (that confused Pekr) about it is, that you did not realize, that there was no need to escape the space character :-) |
Terry 24-May-2010 [5020] | for Graham : delimeters = delimiters |
florin 25-May-2010 [5021x2] | I should've read the entire core manual before posting. Chapter 15 addresses this clearly. |
Processing text and rules seems so natural to rebol. I think I'm going to enjoy this. | |
Gregg 25-May-2010 [5023] | Once you get used to PARSE, it's very hard to use other languages. :-) |
Fork 11-Jul-2010 [5024x2] | I've uploaded my old Whitespace interpreter that I implemented in PARSE to GitHub: http://github.com/hostilefork/whitespacers/raw/master/rebol/whitespace.r |
What's interesting about it is the comparison that can be made to implementations in other languages. I've collected implementations of whitespace interpreters in several other languages (by other people) in that project: http://github.com/hostilefork/whitespacers/ | |
Anton 30-Jul-2010 [5026] | Ok, continuing the discussion from "Performance" group, I'd like to ask for some help with parsing rebol format files. Basically, I'd like to be able to extract a block near the beginning or end of a file, while minimizing disk access. The files to be parsed could be large, so I don't want to load the entire contents, but chunks at a time. So my parse rule should be able to detect when the input has been exhausted and ask for another chunk. (When extracting a block near the end of a file, I'll have to parse in reverse, but I'll try to implement that later.) |
Oldes 30-Jul-2010 [5027] | And why you don't want to use the load/next which was advised? |
Anton 30-Jul-2010 [5028x2] | Using LOAD/NEXT, I still have to use a O(n^2) algorithm. I'd now like to do my own parse, which can be O(n). |
As far as I know, there is no way to instruct LOAD/NEXT to only read chunks from the file as necessary to load the next value. | |
older newer | first last |