r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Syllable] The free desktop and server operating system family

Kaj
7-Sep-2005
[277]
If you're familiar with a Unix command line, there are a lot of standard 
CLI and Curses apps you could use to fill the gaps
Graham
9-Sep-2005
[278]
Seems Carl has ported Rebol to run on Genesi's PegasosPPC - see blog. 
 Perhaps you might be in with a chance with Syllable?
Kaj
16-Sep-2005
[279x2]
That's just Core on PPC Linux. Both ports on PPC and on Linux were 
already done, so this is little more than saying that Core 2.6 still 
builds successfully on those systems
Still, porting Core to Syllable would likely not be very difficult
Graham
16-Sep-2005
[281x2]
Perhaps you might be able to persuade Carl then  if it is likely 
not too difficult.
Then Syllable can use core as default scripting language.
Kaj
16-Sep-2005
[283]
No, we couldn't. It would have to be open source. There's no point 
in Syllable being open source if we would accept closed source into 
the base system
Volker
20-Oct-2005
[284]
VMware offers free "player". Maybe that is a way to distribute syllable 
too? http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/vm/
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[285x2]
Yes, I saw it. It means that more people can try Syllable in VMware. 
We have a VMware image, but it's an old Syllable version. Someday 
somebody will update it
Unfortunately, this afternoon, trying to install the VMware player 
destroyed my Ubuntu Linux installation
Volker
20-Oct-2005
[287]
Oops.
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[288]
Back to Windows, cut off from my work of the past month. Not too 
keen about trying VMware again
Volker
20-Oct-2005
[289]
Knoppix to get at it?
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[290]
Yes, I'll be able to get the files, I think, but it was my new work 
environment since a month
Volker
20-Oct-2005
[291]
How much work to reinstall? And is there a spare machine for installation 
experiments?
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[292]
Yes, but I don't have time for that. Any system or subsystem that 
destroys any part of my work is not worth my consideration
Volker
20-Oct-2005
[293x2]
Now to know that beforehand..
ANd thanks for the hind. I try that more carefull now.
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[295x2]
It wants root, like all the Linux installers. It can do what it wants, 
and it does
I'll have to repair it, but I wasn't planning on doing this kind 
of repair ever
Volker
20-Oct-2005
[297]
Yes, this general root-installation is madness. But in case of vmware 
it may need patched kernel.
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[298x7]
If it had asked for that I would have been more suspicious. It only 
wanted to compile an extra kernel module. Which is bad enough, but 
it should only have been additional
It has destroyed the system configuration files. I'll have to look 
at those
The effect it had was eerie. When I moved a file in the Gnome filer, 
the hard disk stopped running and wouldn't come back when rebooting
I thought the disk was dead, but it was just crashed during normal 
operation. After power cycling it was OK
I don't like installing a program that way...
Trying to run VidaLinux has the same effect on my disk
I don't like an operating system that does that
BrianH
20-Oct-2005
[305x3]
VMware doesn't really support being hosted on Debian-based distributions 
right now, never has.
I would be surprised if the stock installer didn't trash Debian-based 
Linux.
There is probably some third-party info about how to get it running 
though.
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[308]
The main accompanying image ot this VMplayer release is an Ubuntu 
Hoary image. So I didn't see anything wrong with installing the player 
on Hoary. The requirements mention Linux - no warning at all
BrianH
20-Oct-2005
[309]
VMware supports just about any Linux as a client with no difficulty. 
However, it requires a bit of hacking and testing to host VMware, 
so they have only done so on a few stable, commercial distributions 
like RedHat and SUSE.
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[310x2]
If that's so, it would have been easy to produce a warning on any 
other system, before destroying it...
The installer was 3,000 lines of PERL code, the configurator another 
10,000 lines. It should have fit in there, I would think
BrianH
20-Oct-2005
[312]
If they wanted to support Debian, they would have provided a .deb 
- .tar.gz packages always need a little hacking. They do document 
their restrictions on their web site.
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[313]
My complete build system for building the entire Syllable operating 
system is 1600 lines of Ruby. 13,000 lines should be able to do something 
constructive
BrianH
20-Oct-2005
[314]
Personally, I think they should add their player to Debian universe 
(or whatever Debian's term for their repository that includes proprietary 
freeware). Ubuntu too.
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[315]
Yes
BrianH
20-Oct-2005
[316x2]
They should add their client drivers as well.
That'll get their software out there, where it can be tested by the 
community. The feedback alone would be worth it. The goodwill would 
be a bonus.
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[318]
No goodwill here at the moment
BrianH
20-Oct-2005
[319]
They should get their client video drivers (already open-source) 
incorporated in the stock X.org too.
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[320]
That would be good. Syllable comes standard with a VMware video driver
BrianH
20-Oct-2005
[321]
I remember! That was a cool move, by the way...
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[322x2]
Thanks
Didn't realize that it wasn't standard in XFree, but now that you 
mention it
BrianH
20-Oct-2005
[324x2]
As for comparing 13000 lines of Perl to 1600 lines of Ruby, if the 
Perl was written to be readable, that comparison sounds about right. 
Perl isn't that powerful a language unless it's written in an unmaintainable 
way. It takes a lot of Perl to equal Ruby, or REBOL for that matter.
At least that's true for Perl 5 or less...
Kaj
20-Oct-2005
[326]
OK, but those 1600 lines build a complete desktop operating system 
with applications, while those 13,000 lines install and configure 
one application - without checking for destroying your system