World: r3wp
[Syllable] The free desktop and server operating system family
older newer | first last |
Kaj 21-Apr-2005 [30] | Even if I have a personal opinion about it, from the point of view of Syllable, we don't care. We just want all that software to run on Syllable, and integrate well with our platform |
shadwolf 21-Apr-2005 [31] | sure but one is doesn't forbid the other ;) |
Kaj 21-Apr-2005 [32] | That's what we mean :-) |
Kaj 25-Aug-2005 [33] | Gregg? Same question as for Linux: can someone move this group under the Operating Systems divider? Thanks |
Gregg 26-Aug-2005 [34] | Done. |
Kaj 31-Aug-2005 [35x4] | Last weekend we released Syllable 0.5.7: http://syllable.org |
We're moving to a new C library over the course of several releases. After introducing the new GLibC in the previous release, this time all of the Syllable base system is recompiled on top of the new library. The old C and C++ libraries are still included for compatibility with older POSIX applications, but the old versions of the higher-level Syllable and AtheOS libraries have been removed. This means that native Syllable applications should be recompiled. Several of us are currently releasing new versions of our applications | |
There are also some releases of new stuff. For example, Simple Directmedia Layer (SDL) is now ported to Syllable. This opens the door to porting many games and other multimedia applications that are written on top of SDL | |
For Syllable itself it's the usual mix of gradual improvements all over the system. Lately, most of the bigger improvements have been in the included applications. Among others, there are new versions of ABrowse, our browser, XPDF, our PDF reader, and a rewrite of Whisper, the email client | |
james_nak 31-Aug-2005 [39] | Kaj, This sounds interesting! |
Kaj 31-Aug-2005 [40] | I was hoping so :-) |
Pekr 31-Aug-2005 [41] | Kaj, why AGG nor Cairo were found as insufficient for Syllable purposes? IIRC it is Cairo, which will be used by Mozilla platform or even OS-X to render, no? |
Kaj 31-Aug-2005 [42x2] | I'm interested in that, too. :-) What I know is that Arno is making deep changes to the video driver framework to add backbuffering in the memory of the video cards. We think about AGG as a crossplatform rendering library, but Arno is considering the few simple drawing functions in Syllable. Things like line drawing are passed directly to the video drivers, and if a driver supports 2D acceleration, the draw is done in hardware by the video card. In our new framework, these drawing operations need to be able to work directly in the memory of the video card when necessary. It makes sense that crossplatform libraries are not suitable for this deep integration |
Another thing is that Arno considered using OpenGL for this, but according to him, the OpenGL API is not suitable for multithreading, at least not to the extent that we need it at this low level in Syllable | |
Pekr 31-Aug-2005 [44] | who's Arno? :-) |
Kaj 31-Aug-2005 [45] | Arno Klenke, our new coding machine after Kurt burned out over AtheOS :-) |
Pekr 31-Aug-2005 [46x3] | you guys are terrific :-) In current days, when only Windows and Linux are considered as having chance to succeed, well, I forgot OS-X of course :-) |
any news from BeOS camp, how are they doing? Are their initiatives differing way to much not to join the forces? | |
Or if Syllable is similar to AmigaOS, why not to join with Aros or MorphOS? | |
Kaj 31-Aug-2005 [49x3] | Thanks! |
I strongly feel that we are joined ideologically in the Syllable project by all having reached the conclusion that we want to do something new - which was the AtheOS philosophy. The projects that aim to clone older systems have to deal with some significant problems. They're tied by backwards compatibility, and they're working in an environment of decay, because their legacy systems are getting ever more outdated, while still having significant numbers of users. This puts a lot of pressure on them and often leads to negative attitudes | |
For us the only way is up. Every improvement is a positive thing, and we're free to design a modern system | |
Pekr 31-Aug-2005 [52] | yes, but is it for fun? Or what is your intention? Let's say in a few years you reach some 1.0 state and what then? For whom is the system targeted? |
Kaj 31-Aug-2005 [53x4] | The BeOS efforts are fractured, but Haiku seems to be doing quite well. Nevertheless, they're far behind Syllable. They can test parts on BeOS, but their own system is only running at a very basic level. They do have interesting pieces of code, and quite a bit of it at that. They use a BSD license, so any code we want, we can integrate into Syllable. :-) Soon we will release a port of the OpenBFS file system for Syllable |
Amiga has long been fractured, too. There's Amiga Inc., there's MorphOS and there's AROS. Recently I read that their ports of the GNU toolchain and other Unix tools are all different, for example, and can't be integrated anymore. I like AROS, but it's clear that Syllable is much more modern. We have all the things Amiga and Be users always wanted: memory protection, virtual memory, hardware abstraction layer, driver architecture, multi-user. We're also far ahead of AROS because we can port POSIX software and Linux drivers much more easily. Our development environment has been selfhosting for ages, we have lots of drivers, USB, etcetera. | |
Although Syllable is fun, a big reason for its founding was that a stated goal of AtheOS was that it was a hobby project, while we mean business - albeit in the long run :-) | |
Syllable is clearly focussed at the desktop, and we want a system that is as friendly as possible for regular users, while still being very powerful for people who know what they're doing, and offering a smooth learning curve between those two states. Pretty much the Amiga philosophy. And we have no intention of resting on our laurels once we call it 1.0 :-) | |
Pekr 31-Aug-2005 [57] | :-) thanks ... and what about Syllable and scripting in general? |
Kaj 31-Aug-2005 [58] | Ahum; that's my area and it's kind of a struggle. I like high-level languages, but when I joined Syllable I had already established that there were better things than Python. I had ported Ruby to AtheOS and that's what we're using now in my build system and in the installer |
Pekr 31-Aug-2005 [59] | will there be API to "plug" other languages? :-) |
Kaj 31-Aug-2005 [60x2] | Ruby is very powerful, but not as elegant and agile as some others. We can use it well in the periphery, but we don't really want to include it in the system. I ported R# to Syllable, but it stalled, so I had to look further. Then Io came along and I ported that. It's great, but I still want to swap it for REBOL. That's hard, but I'm going to try porting Orca next |
Bindings to the native Syllable API are a big problem, as with other systems. One of my requirements for a high-level language is that it makes bindings as easy as possible, and supports multithreading very well. I looked into many things, like .Net, but found that this is not the case for most languages, so I'm more focussed on getting one good language than a general bindings framework now | |
Kaj 3-Sep-2005 [62x3] | If you're interested in the video driver framework, we're now having an excellent discussion on the mailing list about how to integrate OpenGL: |
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=syllable-developer | |
The driver framework is going to be revamped with better use of the video card: backbuffering and integrated 2D drawing functions. The current discussion will also lead to deep integration of 3D. Both software rendering and hardware rendering are being worked on. This takes the kind of fundamental changes throughout the system that take many years on for example Linux, because no project has control over all the parts that need to be changed to coordinate everything in the best way possible | |
Graham 3-Sep-2005 [65] | Perhaps you can make an avi of your talk ( ? in English ) on Sept 11 ? |
Kaj 3-Sep-2005 [66x2] | That would be nice, but it will be in Dutch |
Last time it was filmed, but I don't know if the movies were processed. We did get a number of still pictures. I linked to them in my posts on our forum, if you're interested | |
Graham 3-Sep-2005 [68] | What can u do with the live CD? |
Kaj 3-Sep-2005 [69] | Similar things as other live CDs: Linux, BSD, AROS |
Graham 3-Sep-2005 [70] | BartPE ? |
Kaj 3-Sep-2005 [71] | Look around, maybe even do some work, although the live CD is not as stable as an installation |
Graham 3-Sep-2005 [72x2] | ok. |
Able to read ntfs partitions ? | |
Kaj 3-Sep-2005 [74x2] | I don't know BartPE, but it's obviously inspired by the Linux live CDs |
No, we don't have an NTFS driver yet | |
Graham 3-Sep-2005 [76x2] | BartPE is a Bart's ... ( some dutch name ) version of MS Personal Environment. |
I use it to boot up with and check PCs with XP for viruses and spyware. | |
Volker 3-Sep-2005 [78x2] | How can i install it without a cd-burner? |
And: did Carl say anything further about porting rebol there? MAybe he can make a short test-case for that select-stuff? | |
older newer | first last |