World: r3wp
[Syllable] The free desktop and server operating system family
older newer | first last |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [734] | I have those manuals here somewhere, but... Only AtheOS version 1 was meant as an Amiga clone, eons ago. It was rewritten three times to become its own operating system. Only the general Amiga spirit remains - with the BeOS spirit on top of it |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [735] | k |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [736] | Someone should port UAE one of these days |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [737] | would that be like incest ;-) |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [738x2] | Since AROS can run hosted, it would be thinkable to port it to Syllable, maybe even with deeper integration |
Those are interesting possibilities, but it's not a focus of ours | |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [740] | are you going to devcon? |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [741x2] | We're only three or five people. Creating an operating system is a bit of a... tall order |
I would like to go, but I'm afraid I will be too busy this year | |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [743x3] | I think that you could have a nice private talk with Carl... since you have all the reasons to port R3, I think it would be a good use case for Carl to make sure the whole design doesn't assume linux windows or Mac |
ah well. | |
does syllable only run on x86? or could it be retargetted on efika boards, for example? | |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [746] | Don't worry. I already did that a year and a half ago in Milan :-) |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [747] | :-) |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [748] | x86 only now, but it should be easy to port. It's just that porting is hard in itself, so all the people who have claimed that they were going to do it over the weekend have never been heard from again :-) |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [749] | I can understand the H/W driver part being a nightmare. timing and resource sharing is not trivial. |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [750] | It's almost all C, with just a few fragments of assembler. The drivers are from Linux and X, so if you go back to the original versions, they're portable |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [751] | ok, as long as they are also available for the other HW, I see... good practice :-) |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [752] | It's just that it's a deeply technical procedure with many steps, so few people are capable of it, and everyone would have to learn along the way |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [753] | yes obviously. |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [754x2] | The easiest and most useful port would be to AMD64, so when we get to it, we will focus on that first |
Over the years I've already done work on cross-compiling toolchains | |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [756] | is syllable able to compile itself? |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [757x2] | Since time immemorial. That's how we got AtheOS from Kurt, and it has been a huge advantage |
We don't cross-develop such as almost all other alternative systems. We develop on Syllable itself, so we have always been at a relatively low bug level | |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [759] | using your own stuff always improves its quality. the nasty things get fixed fast... they annoy you the first :-) |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [760x2] | With the cross-compiling toolchain, we could develop for Linux on Syllable :-) |
Exactly | |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [762] | does Orca support AGG dialect? |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [763x3] | In fact, I use my Syllable build system on Linux to build the ORCA and GrUB packages for Linux |
No, ORCA is still very basic. It has bindings for BZip2, but nothing else yet | |
We don't have an AGG port yet for Syllable, either, but I hear it just compiles. Integration is another story, though | |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [766] | if porting of R3 is possible and works out in the end... would you consider dropping ORCA just for the fact that you would have access to much more applications from day one? and since you can adapt and extend it from the inside (per the info so far), you could still add your own custom native flavor to it... |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [767x3] | We would include both. Our strategy for survival is to be open source, so we can't make the system dependent on closed parts. But, at least in our project, we can put closed stuff on top of it |
So we use ORCA in the base system to increase the level of REBOL, and we could run REBOL 3 applications on top | |
You see that it's important to us that ORCA is REBOL compatible, so the two layers can communicate | |
Maxim 5-Mar-2007 [770] | i see |
Alan 5-Mar-2007 [771] | do you have an image of this biuld to use with VMPlayer yet ? |
Kaj 5-Mar-2007 [772x2] | Yes, from now on we're building the VMWare image ourselves. It's among the download files |
It can also be used in many other emulators | |
Alan 5-Mar-2007 [774] | thanks |
Kaj 15-Jun-2007 [775x3] | Syllable is OK, Petr |
In a week we have a small conference, our second, in the Netherlands. We will make an important announcement there | |
We have several things coming up, including a new release | |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [778x2] | important announcement? Interesting! Are you becoming AmigaOS 5? :-) |
is there a chance REBOL will remain for scripting? I mean - with R3 model, there is now certain possibility to use R3 open source parts in syllable, and then, theoretically, cloning rebol itself should be an easier task? Is Syllable strictly open source? Or could it live with closed source R3 rebol.dll? | |
Kaj 15-Jun-2007 [780x3] | Yes :-) |
I'll not spoil the conference by specifying what I said yes to :-) | |
But as I've already said here before, we're already using ORCA for some scripting. Because the base system has to stay open source | |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [783] | :-) |
older newer | first last |