r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Syllable] The free desktop and server operating system family

Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[977]
Haiku is BSD-licensed, so that's yet another scene
ICarii
30-Jun-2007
[978x2]
Syllable was originally an Atheos fork want it after teh other guy 
stopped writing it?
excuse my terrible typing :(
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[980]
Correct
Pekr
30-Jun-2007
[981]
what is the purpose of server edition?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[982]
To be a server :-)
Pekr
30-Jun-2007
[983]
I don't understand its architecture - is it linux kernel with Syllable 
API?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[984]
Yes, basically
Pekr
30-Jun-2007
[985]
And - will you switch to linux kernel also for desktop edition too?
ICarii
30-Jun-2007
[986]
is there a danger that it will cannibalize your syllable desktop 
setups?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[987]
No, that's why we call it Syllable Server
ICarii
30-Jun-2007
[988]
but wouldnt a syllable server user have the best of both worlds?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[989x2]
The cannibalization issue is real, but we are facing it with full 
conscience. It's strategic. We have failed to attract application 
developers so far, so by putting our APIs on top of Linux we should 
finally convince them
People will write for the Linux, but the apps will run on Desktop 
as well, so it's a win
Pekr
30-Jun-2007
[991]
that' a good plan
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[992x2]
Desktop will still be superior for desktop use. Our founder didn't 
create our kernel for nothing
Thanks
ICarii
30-Jun-2007
[994]
does syllable use a kit system like beos did?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[995]
Yes, same model, with minor variations
ICarii
30-Jun-2007
[996]
nice - i really liked that about beos
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[997]
Another interesting effect is that we can now show very precisely 
how parts of Linux compare to ours
Pekr
30-Jun-2007
[998]
kit system?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[999]
It's a semi-microkernel approach
Pekr
30-Jun-2007
[1000]
btw - is there any plan for R3 clone? Most open source parts will 
be usable, API seems to be defined, so maybe cloning effort is easier 
now? Or don't you mind using 3rd party binary packages?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[1001x3]
We have a modular monolithic kernel, not a real microkernel. But 
still, most functionality runs in userspace servers. BeOS groups 
them and calls each a kit
Cloning R3 is pretty much beyond our reach. We only have time to 
integrate existing parts
So the strategy is to use ORCA for simple system parts, to keep the 
base system open source
Pekr
30-Jun-2007
[1004]
but Orca will soon become absolutly forgotten imo, as R3 introduces 
lots of new things to REBOL. I think it will soon become irrelevant 
product ....
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[1005x2]
R3 will be extra functionally, but its openness should help appeace 
open-source people
ORCA is not irrelevant. It's an essential system part of both Syllable 
Server and Syllable Desktop
Pekr
30-Jun-2007
[1007]
I know that it is important for you, but I fear it will die, once 
R3 is out, due to incompatibilities? Is ORCA still being developed?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[1008x2]
It will be developed by us as needed
How can a language die, that is an essential part of a non-dead operating 
system?
Pekr
30-Jun-2007
[1010]
I hope R3 model will help in that regard too and that some new ppl 
will join and Rebol will be cloned ....
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[1011]
That might happen in the far future, but it's not a focus of ours
Graham
30-Jun-2007
[1012]
is there a description of the fuctionality available now with orca?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[1013]
It comes with sparse documentation
Graham
30-Jun-2007
[1014]
what % of core is done?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[1015]
Karl said 50% of natives
Graham
30-Jun-2007
[1016]
I guess if Rebol/View is only going to run on server .. that would 
be my choice if I had to choose...
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[1017]
It's not. We must port it to our graphical environment, but then 
it should be easy to port to Desktop
Graham
30-Jun-2007
[1018]
Has Carl shown any interest?
ICarii
30-Jun-2007
[1019]
Carl was going to open source view wasnt he?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[1020]
In the first years, you would choose the Linux for stability and 
hardware support. Over time, you would migrate to Desktop for superior 
performance and ease of use
Graham
30-Jun-2007
[1021]
5 year plan?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[1022]
Carl doesn't know about the Linux version yet. I gave him the Desktop 
version two years ago in Milan. It was part of the considerations 
to make R3 much more portable
Pekr
30-Jun-2007
[1023]
Does Karl still maintain Orca?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[1024]
Somewhat. There have been a few fixes over the past year
Pekr
30-Jun-2007
[1025]
btw - why is there problem with open source and binary packages? 
Isn't linux distributing nvidia or ati binary drivers anyway?
Kaj
30-Jun-2007
[1026]
Depends a lot on the distro. Many are against it