r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Linux] group for linux REBOL users

btiffin
30-Jul-2007
[1696x2]
Once again.  Schedules are a technical mistake in my opinion.  But 
reality is, this has to be balanced with predictable business planning 
and the more cerebral "keeping up interest by staying fresh".  My 
business is being built on what I feel is techincal merit, not full 
colour glossy.  peoplecards.ca is currently a three person business 
and the technical decisions are currently mine without management 
influence.  That may change as the business grows, but I'll rail 
against it if schedules begin to outweigh technical soak times and 
truthful developer confidence in their products.  One of the beauties 
of GNU/Linux, there is usually an option that is not schedule or 
market driven.
Well, that and the fact I'm a stubborn REBOL solution first kind 
of techie  :)
Kaj
30-Jul-2007
[1698x2]
We rely on incremental development. It's not hard to release early 
and often that way, which is essential to get people's attention 
and contributions. And actually, it's also essential to keep the 
system stable
I think there was a time, long ago, that I tended to think in terms 
of bing bang releases, but that time is forever gone
btiffin
30-Jul-2007
[1700]
Sounds like you've got things well in hand.  One of the things that 
Debian and Ubuntu, at some 18,000 plus packages may have a tougher 
time with.  I prefer the Debian wait, over the 6 month deadline of 
Unbuntu still.
Kaj
30-Jul-2007
[1701]
Big bang, that is
btiffin
30-Jul-2007
[1702]
Ubuntu that is.
Kaj
30-Jul-2007
[1703]
:-)
btiffin
30-Jul-2007
[1704]
Same with the kernel.  I'm in no rush for the next big thing in the 
Linux kernel, but never ever want to get in the head space of being 
one the beta testers of an even numbered release.  But if plop an 
odd number on Dev, well that will be me managing my own expectations.
Carlos
1-Aug-2007
[1705]
anyone could help me to make MAGIC works with Apache2 on Debian?
btiffin
1-Aug-2007
[1706]
Sorry, Carlos...I'm a Debian user, but I serve the web using Cheyenne. 
 I'm not sure what you need exactly, but I would have started here 
 http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_mime_magic.htmlSo one 
you have the mod_ file in the right place, it seems you need to configure 
with

MimeMagicFile conf/magic


to use the default list of magic numbers.  If you need more drop 
another note.
PeterWood
1-Aug-2007
[1707]
Carlos: Do you mean Magic! - Olivier Auverlot's Rebol in a Webpage 
framework?
Carlos
2-Aug-2007
[1708x3]
Yes a mean Olivierīs Magic!. I have set all according to the docs 
but yet Apache cannot finf my .rhtml page
this is the message I get: Not Found


The requested URL /cgi-script/magic.cgi/index.rhtml was not found 
on this server.

Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) PHP/4.4.4-8+etch3 Server at 192.168.1.100 Port 
80
I have put my index.rhtml at the same directory of the others html 
pages i.e. /var/www
PeterWood
2-Aug-2007
[1711]
I can run Magic! under Apache 1.5 on my machine; I don't have Apache 
2 installed.


I have magic.cgi installed in the cgi-bin directory (equivalent of 
your cgi-script) and access the .rhtml pages from another directory. 
This is my setup:

In the httpd.conf file:

AddHandler magic .rhtml          
    Action magic /cgi-bin/magic.cgi

in the URL/cgi-bin folder 
 magci.cgi

in the URL/magic folder
 test.rhtml

page accessed via http://URL/Magic/test.rhtml

Hope this helps
Carlos
3-Aug-2007
[1712]
Peter, it really helped me. Iīve found my mistake on the httpd.conf 
file. Now it works. Thank you!
Robert
20-Aug-2007
[1713]
I have a sendmail question: I have some users with crowded mailboxes, 
as the marked such mails as keep-on-the-server. And I now want to 
get rid of them. How can I empty a users mailbox?
Pekr
20-Aug-2007
[1714x2]
connect via rebol and "clear" them, but you would have to know their 
passwords  of course ...
if in console, I would do the same using some console tool. Or simply 
delete mailbox and create empty file of particular name and attributes. 
But I never tried it :-)
Robert
20-Aug-2007
[1716x5]
Seems like I can use the MAIL command on the server...
Hmm... not working that good.
hwo to invoke it? I use: MAIL -I -f mbox-filename
Ok, I can use: >mail-box-filename to get rid of it... but this will 
kill all mails.
Now, using MUTT it works very well.
Henrik
28-Aug-2007
[1721]
I can't send mail from rebol via Ubuntu. I've configured it correctly, 
and it sends and says that everything is ok, but nothing happens 
on the receiver end. Ideas?
Robert
28-Aug-2007
[1722]
did you take a look at the log files? /var/log/messages
Henrik
28-Aug-2007
[1723x3]
it's empty
no logs show anything related to rebol
or sending mails or unauthorized access to network ports
Robert
28-Aug-2007
[1726]
You need to connect to an SMTP server. At least this should be somehow 
logged.
Henrik
28-Aug-2007
[1727x2]
mails are coming in now, so I guess it works.
(very delayed)
Robert
28-Aug-2007
[1729]
could be a SPAM filter. Mine delays mails (generating an error on 
the first try) to get rid of spammer.
Henrik
28-Aug-2007
[1730]
very annoying when I'm sending emails to myself. :-)
DanielSz
31-Aug-2007
[1731]
I just installed altme on ubuntu, but I don't get to see messages. 
Screen of all groups, except rebolweek, are empty.
Kaj
31-Aug-2007
[1732]
Are you getting older messages in this group now?
DanielSz
31-Aug-2007
[1733]
Ok, if I post a message, then all the messages come up. Isn't there 
a way to sync everythting in one go?
Kaj
31-Aug-2007
[1734]
That has been the way to do it for many years...
DanielSz
31-Aug-2007
[1735]
Ah!
Kaj
31-Aug-2007
[1736]
It's worse on big worlds
DanielSz
31-Aug-2007
[1737]
Had no clue. That's interesting.
Kaj
31-Aug-2007
[1738]
It's a bug, of course
DanielSz
31-Aug-2007
[1739]
Thanks, Kaj!
Henrik
31-Aug-2007
[1740]
sometimes it helps to logout and back in again a few times
DanielSz
31-Aug-2007
[1741]
ok, will do, Henrik, thanks!
amacleod
31-Aug-2007
[1742]
had the same problem with using different computers with the same 
account. One computer would not upload all the messages...both windows 
XP
btiffin
1-Sep-2007
[1743x2]
Graham;  What brand of VMWare are you running.  i.e. did you but 
it?
VMWare = VMware  but = buy.
Graham
1-Sep-2007
[1745]
using vmware server ... free