World: r3wp

Louis, rebol 2.7.6?

Yes.

What is Linux PPC?

Linux running on PowerPC hardware, I guess.

Like some Mac computers.

And PlayStation 3.

rebview-ppc.gzip contains rebview-ppc.gzip.  Is that what it is supposed 
to contain?

I think you are right, Geomol. Neither Linux x86 nor Linux PPC will 
work for me. I'm probably doing something wrong.

Have you tried starting rebol from a terminal program?

No, that is a good idea. I'll try.

No success.

Hm, strange. And rebol is executable?
chmod +x rebol

The last thing, I can think of, is correct version of libc.

libc? I'm new to Linux, so is very likely something very simple.

[Dad-:-sim-v]:~/rebol-276$ chmod +x rebol
[Dad-:-sim-v]:~/rebol-276$ rebol
bash: rebol: command not found

I'm afraid not. You still have to be some kind of a hacker to get 
some things working under Linux.
Try:
./rebol

or put rebol in a location, where you path point to. E.g.: /usr/local/bin/

Ok, that works. Thanks!  I can see that I have a little bit of studying 
to do to learn the commands .

You're welcome! :-)

Well worth the effort Louis.  GNU/Linux is and always has been my 
favourite "IDE".   :)

btiffin, Well, I've had many problems with XP, so I'm ready to move 
on. Most of the software I'm been using on XP was ported from Linus. 
Only a few are genuine XP programs. So, I'

m hoping they will work on XP runnning under Virtualbox.

Wine is your friend for most Windows needs under GNU/Linux.   It's 
just better, smarter, stronger.  But ... it does require learning 
a little bit about computing.  Something MS seems to want to keep 
to themselves for that whole, lock in mentality their stock price 
is based on.

My XP machine presently freezes up randomly. It may be caused by 
a virus, but Kapersky can't find it. Ghost will not boot up to restore 
my backup. So, I'm rather disgusted with XP at the moment. Actually, 
I don't even want to run it under Virtualbox.

Do you recommend wine over Virtualbox?

Never tried Virtualbox.  Wine is great though.  WineHQ pumps out 
releases on a very regular basis.  It gets better everyday and they 
package it up for apt, rpm and most GNU/Linux binary package managers.

And the developers are gamers too, so the list of supported apps 
usually starts with games, then works down through the other applications.

http://www.winehq.orgfor more info.

I just looked.  Yesterday they announced a freeze for Wine 1.0   
Woohoo.   Yes, there will be incompatibilities, but it seems the 
principals feel it's ready  for a 1.0 tag.  Great news.

Hope they fix that decimal bug.

Do any of you guys use Linux without a gui? I note that

Gimp can be loaded from the command console. Could it be loaded if 
there were no gui such as KDE?

Unless you are using gimp script, I would think you would at least 
need an X server somewhere.

If so, it seems to me that work would go a lot faster without the 
gui once the main Linux commands are learned. Am I right about this?

You would be wrong about the problem domain that is covered by your 
example app, Gimp. Other problem domains could be different though.

I would be slowed down - I can't type very quickly.

What do you mean by "problem domain"?

In this case, image editing.

I mean the general kind of problem an app is supposed to help with.

Ok, I see what you mean. I guess it would be best to keep all options 
open. I've just be intriged by how much faster one can, for example, 
locate files use the command console---it is almost instant.

Thanks, Brian.

coLinux-based distributiins manage just fine on Windows with just 
console and networking support - all of the GUI and sound stuff comes 
from servers running as native Windows apps and talking over the 
network connection.

Most of what I do could in theory be done from the command line (I 
don't edit images much), but the gain or loss in productivity varies.

I use have used Unix without a gui  well  forever,   but unless gimp 
has an ascii rendering mode  (netpbm does) it may not be what you 
want .

I'm keeping KDE, but I find myself more and more using the the command 
console (or eshell from emacs).

Louis;  Woohoo.  CLI wins in my book.  Everytime.   Well I take that 
back a little.  Windowed CLI's are just that little bit better, in 
terms of eye strain and quickly getting from task A to task B.  Konsole 
is the da bomb.  Note, my mileage varies.  I don't really do art, 
but I appreciate it when I see it.


Learn some bash, AWK, sed, tr and cut and there won't be a text file 
that can't be scrunched and munched into whatever form you desire. 
 ;)  Well, Icon too if you have reaallly complex needs.  Umm, assuming 
REBOL doesn't already have a one-liner solution.

I never used a GUI on Linux. The only thing I need is midnight commander.

I don't use a GUI on Syllable Server because it doesn't have one 
yet :-)

If you work in a terminal emulator in an X window, you can just start 
graphical apps from the command line

If you really want to do it from the text mode console, you have 
to start X first. And then when you start an X app, it will open 
on console 7, the graphical one where X runs, so you have to switch 
consoles

Has anyone a link to a good GCC toolchain tutorial. Things like: 
How to make static-link-libs, etc.