r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Linux] group for linux REBOL users

RobertS
17-Feb-2009
[2643x3]
I am having some issues running 276 rebview on the fractured Xandros 
that comes on an Asus Eee Netbook ... anyone else trying Rebol on 
an Eee (mine is just a linux Atom 900A)
I have put eeeBuntu on a LiveUSB (the base version was only about 
600 Mb ISO ) and may install that as my debian
There is also an eeeDora (Fedora) and an alternate debian (Easy Peasy 
aka Ubuntu-eee )
Oldes
17-Feb-2009
[2646x2]
You are trying to listen on this port = running Time service from 
Rebol.
you should use something like open tcp://localhost:13
amacleod
17-Feb-2009
[2648]
same access error
Robert
17-Feb-2009
[2649x2]
Have you checked no one else is using this port already?
netstat -tna
Oldes
17-Feb-2009
[2651]
also try  iptables -L   if the port is not blocked
amacleod
17-Feb-2009
[2652]
iptaables -L...
I do not see any mention of any blocked ports...
Izkata
17-Feb-2009
[2653]
To use a port under 1024 in linux you have to be root
amacleod
17-Feb-2009
[2654x2]
I'm trying to get the daytimer from xinetd running...

Not sure how . I see the daytime config file and turned of disabled 
and restarted xinetd but still can't readh it.
root!!! Good point...
Izkata
17-Feb-2009
[2656]
I did notice something strange, though - enough failed attempts at 
opening a listening port, and rebol can't open any more.  Have to 
start a clean session
amacleod
17-Feb-2009
[2657x3]
You are the man...Izkata
Got it up and running
I hate root
Graham
17-Feb-2009
[2660]
RobertS, I think most of us with the eee just reformat them and install 
windows xp
Brock
17-Feb-2009
[2661]
Graham, I'm assuming then that there are no driver issues when you 
do this?
Graham
17-Feb-2009
[2662]
Just download the drivers first
Kaj
17-Feb-2009
[2663]
RobertS, I know two people using REBOL on Eee with Linux. What are 
your issues?
Gabriele
18-Feb-2009
[2664]
Graham, funny, I did the opposite, bought an eee Box, reformatted 
and installed Linux...
Kaj
18-Feb-2009
[2665]
:-)
Graham
18-Feb-2009
[2666]
Gabriele, that's odd ... the linux versions are cheaper!  And i have 
quite a few spare XP licenses ...
BrianH
19-Feb-2009
[2667x2]
It depends on which country you live in. Installing XP on it is not 
a simple task though - you need to PXE boot your installer.
The XP installer often has problems with USB-connected drives, in 
my experience. It's simpler to clean up the OEM XP install.
Graham
19-Feb-2009
[2669]
Booted fine with my USB DVD writer
BrianH
20-Feb-2009
[2670x2]
Cool.
I recommend awxLink if you want to use it with XP - it's a lot easier 
than trying to get software to install on D itself.
Gabriele
21-Feb-2009
[2672]
G: there was no Linux version of the Box (notice, not eee PC, eee 
Box).
Graham
21-Feb-2009
[2673x2]
G: ahh.... never met anyone who bought one of those.  They already 
come with embedded linux, was that enough?  :)
wasn't ...
Kaj
22-Feb-2009
[2675]
Two Linuxes is better than one :-)
Gabriele
22-Feb-2009
[2676]
That wasn't enough, that box needs to run a View program (and basically 
just that, though since now it's there it also runs Skype etc.). 
It was a replacement for a old (10 years old, and it was low spec 
back then) PC that literally exploded.
Anton
22-Feb-2009
[2677]
Capacitors ?
Gabriele
23-Feb-2009
[2678]
probably, it was the power supply. i didn't open it is there really 
was no point. the pc still works after replacing the power supply 
with one I had around, though i don't think it would last more than 
a couple months, and it's too old to be used for anything.
Anton
23-Feb-2009
[2679]
RIP
Kaj
23-Feb-2009
[2680]
Syllable can probably raise it from the dead :-)
Graham
23-Feb-2009
[2681]
Those power supplies can make a rather loud bang with smoke etc :)
Gabriele
24-Feb-2009
[2682]
Kaj, possible, but I have no use for it at this point. The installed 
OS right now is Xubuntu, which is slow to boot etc. but once booted 
runs REBOL fine enough.
Robert
15-Mar-2009
[2683x4]
I normally don't install development tools on my production servers. 
I just install pre-compiled packages. This works good most of the 
time.
But how to handle source-only packages? I have an other system with 
everything on place. But how to do the install on the production 
server?
The makefiles won't run (because compiler versions etc. is checked) 
and deriving what to install where is not straight forward to derive 
from makefiles.
Any idea how to best do it?
Anton
15-Mar-2009
[2687x2]
What would be good to know is what new files are added during an 
installation. So maybe you could compile & install on your other 
system with development tools in place, then examine which files 
were added, then copy them to the production server.
To achieve the above you need to do 2 things:

1) Log files that were modified or added during the compile/installation 
(or otherwise find them after the installation).
2) Copy to the production server.
Robert
15-Mar-2009
[2689]
Well... yes, but that's quite heavy. But maybe the only way to handle 
it.
Anton
15-Mar-2009
[2690x3]
To do 1, it may help to use this console command after an install.

 alias recent='find . -type f -printf '\''%TY-%Tm-%Td/%TT %p\n'\'' 
 | sort'
We can't be the only ones wondering how to do this, so I will check 
google for a tool to monitor installs....
1)  inotify - Looks promising. Requires programming, but user-land 
tools have been created http://inotify-tools.sourceforge.net/