World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
Andreas 2-Mar-2011 [4028] | If the Unity launcher (at least I think that's how the launchbar in the netbook thing is called) still uses .desktop files, it's probably only a matter of finding the associated .desktop file and modifying it to use Terminal=true |
BrianH 2-Mar-2011 [4029] | Or rather making associated desktop files. It turns out that the menu editor included is for the GNOME menu, not the Unity menu. There is no editor for the Unity menu. I'm going to try to figure out what needs to be done. |
MaxV 8-Mar-2011 [4030] | Did you try http://www.maxvessi.net/rebsite/Linux/?? |
ddharing 8-Mar-2011 [4031] | Does anyone do anonymous pipes with REBOL? I've found that when doing an "insert system/ports/output my-data", that it won't actuallly send "my-data" until you halt or quit. Is there a way to force it to send so the script can continue to do other things and send more data later? |
MaxV 8-Mar-2011 [4032] | call function is not eough? call "cp source.txt dest.txt" |
Gregg 8-Mar-2011 [4033] | Have you tried UPDATE? Not sure on anonymous pipes though. |
ddharing 8-Mar-2011 [4034x2] | Gregg, I tried that and it generates an error -- Cannot use updae on this type port |
MaxV, It is possible to use call, but then the scripit would be executing like CGI. I wanted to pipe two REBOL scripts from the command line and have the first script periodically send data to the second. Of course I could use a socket, but that's a little more complex. | |
Maxim 8-Mar-2011 [4036x2] | actually, using sockets is really simple. |
I mean, its probably less hassle and you'd already have it working by now ;-) I mean TCP server/clients can be as little as 5 lines each in rebol. | |
ddharing 8-Mar-2011 [4038x2] | Maxim, you're absolutely right. I am just thinking in terms of being pipe friendly on the Linux command line. |
You know, the Unix way of doing things. | |
Maxim 8-Mar-2011 [4040x2] | did you try looking at the port states? |
don't know what can be manipulated on the i/o ports | |
ddharing 8-Mar-2011 [4042] | I'm not an expert on the port object, so I'm continuing to do research. |
Geocaching 8-Mar-2011 [4043x3] | Hello, I encounter a problem with the draw dialect under linux (rebol/view 2.7.8). I have tried the following code from the official documentation: view layout [ box black 100x100 effect [ draw [ pen red line 30x30 50x20 70x70 40x50 pen blue box 20x20 80x80 fill-pen 0.100.0 box 20x60 40x80 pen white text 8x25 "Example" fill-pen gold flood 2x2 ] ] ] |
Under windows, the text appears properly; but under linux, nothing appears. | |
Actally, it seems that the interpretation of the draw dialect stops when encountering the 'text. | |
Pekr 8-Mar-2011 [4046] | might be a font problem? Better wait for some real experts, though ... |
Geocaching 8-Mar-2011 [4047] | When you try this under linux view layout [ box snow 100x100 effect [ draw [ pen black text 10x10 "Red Box:" pen red fill-pen red box 10x30 80x50 ] ] ] Only the snow box appears! Nothing is drawn into it... and rebol does not launch an error. THis confirms that the interpretation of the dialect is stopped when the 'text is reached. Under windows, no problem! |
Cyphre 8-Mar-2011 [4048] | Under linux you need to setup the font object to be able use text rendered by DRAW dialect. So something like this should work: my-font: make face/font [ name: "/usr/share/fonts/truetype/freefont/FreeSans.ttf" ;replace with your path to font you want to use size: 12 ] view layout [ box snow 100x100 effect [ draw [ font my-font pen black text 10x10 "Red Box:" pen red fill-pen red box 10x30 80x50 ] ] ] |
Geocaching 8-Mar-2011 [4049] | Cyphre... THANKS SO MUCH!! It works... But now, how I can make my script working on both linux and windows with the same fonts look and feel? |
Cyphre 8-Mar-2011 [4050] | you can put the os specific setup into something like: switch system/version/4 [ 4 [ ;Linux ] 3 [ ;Windows ] ] |
MaxV 9-Mar-2011 [4051] | What is the default Font for Rebol? I could add this font package in Rebol linux installer. |
Oldes 9-Mar-2011 [4052] | Better to choose a font which works on Linux... last time I used Rebol/View on linux, the default font look was very bad. |
Cyphre 9-Mar-2011 [4053] | yes, I'd suggest to choose some nice looking font(prefferably free one, but depends on you) on Linux and then use it with the app on all systems. |
MaxV 9-Mar-2011 [4054] | But newbies need a working rebol on Linux., then they will choose their font. So, what is the default font on Rebol? |
Oldes 9-Mar-2011 [4055x2] | On windows I think it's arial |
You can check it on linux using: ? system/view/vid/vid-styles/text/font | |
Cyphre 9-Mar-2011 [4057] | MaxV: the problem on Linux is that there is no easy way how to get font path just by giving the font name + font type.( Windows does that automatically) If you know how to do it in Linux so it works on all distributions that would be helpful. (Maybe it would be enough to write some parser in rebol to get the font information from some place in the system, but I have no time to investigate this as I'm not using Linux for desktop stuff.) |
MaxV 9-Mar-2011 [4058x2] | ? system/view/vid/vid-styles/text/font helvetica so, is it enogh having helvetica font? No, I made a link to FreeSans.ttf this way: ln -s FreeSans.ttf helvetica.ttf but it doesn't work. I think that the path is wrong. The standard linux path now is: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/freefont/ so if Rebol path would be /usr/share/fonts/truetype/freefont/FreeSans.ttf , we have resolved all problems! |
Is there a way to know Rebol font path? | |
Maxim 9-Mar-2011 [4060] | rebol uses system fonts, so its the other way round, is there a way to know system font path. on linux no one has done any in-depth assessment if there is a single way to find out what are the installed fonts for *any* linux. |
Tomc 10-Mar-2011 [4061] | I tend to use thing like stderr: open/direct/binary %/dev/stderr but am no longer petending to care about windows portability |
MaxV 10-Mar-2011 [4062] | My other question is: why Rebol find the fonts path for all dialects except DRAW? |
BrianH 10-Mar-2011 [4063x2] | R2 uses different methods to do regular graphics and Draw. Draw is done only with AGG, the rest of View is not. The font code is different. |
For R3, all graphics are done with AGG. Don't know yet about the font support on Linux. | |
MaxV 10-Mar-2011 [4065] | May you explain me why this works under Linux and no font PATH is requested? REBOL [ title: "SW-like scroller by Cyphre" author: [cyphre-:-seznam-:-cz] ] scr-size: 640x220 scrl: scr-size * 0x1 c1: scrl c2: as-pair scr-size/x / 2.5 scr-size/y / 5 c3: as-pair scr-size/x - (scr-size/x / 2.5) c2/y view/new layout [ origin 0 bx: box scr-size effect [draw [] gradcol 0x-1 sky black] with [feel: none] ] while [not empty? system/view/screen-face/pane][ scrl/2: scrl/2 - 1 img: to-image t-face: make face [edge: none color: black size: scr-size text: system/license font: make font [size: 20 style: 'bold color: white] para: make para [scroll: scrl]] if scrl/y < - second size-text t-face [ scrl/y: c1/y ] bx/effect/draw: [ pen black fill-pen black box 0x0 scr-size image img c2 c3 scr-size c1 ] show bx wait 0 ] ??????? |
Cyphre 10-Mar-2011 [4066x2] | To clarify the 'font issue' a bit: In REBOL2 there are two different 'font engines': engine1: is used when you set face/text field engine2: is used when you use face/effect: [draw [text "..."]] On Windows both engines use the same OS functions for the font handling. Therefore no differencies are seen at the script level. On Linux the Engine1 us using some X-windows api and the Engine2 is using FreeType2 library. The X-windows font api doesn't support antialiasing and the font output in general is not so nice (depending on the distro). The FreeType2 lib has better font quality output and also supports antialiasing but you have to know the full-path to the font file. Currently noone suggested any efficient method how to get the 'font path' in unified way (considering the 'mess' between different Linux distros). When I tried to investigate a bit someone pointed me to the FontConfig lib that should take care of this problem on Linux. But: 1. I don'r know if the fontconfig is really widely supported and what other 'framewrorks' are possible on the rest of distros that don't have fontconfig... 2. I don't know how easy/hard is to get the info from fontconfig, havent studied it 3. as I said I'm not using Linux for desktop stuff so it is nto my high-priority item. Another solution is to intorduce something like global font-path in the Rebol system object which would be used for the font lookup. This variable could be set individually by user or author of the rebol program. We could also provide some font-name/type->font-file matching table but that would take some research as well and won't work for all setups. But at least something. So If anyone here from the 'Linux power users' group knows a good solution or even propose a prototype of the solution I believe Carl will be glad for your help. |
MaxV: regarding the example question above: the answer is easy: in this example the font is rendered using the 'Engine1' (see the msg above) then the output is cvonverted to bitmap(image) and the image is rendered as texture using perspective transformation. So in the end the 'Engine2' is not used in the example in any way. | |
MaxV 10-Mar-2011 [4068x2] | I noticed a difference between Linux and Windows: Widndows: ? system/view/vid/vid-styles/text/font == "arial" Linux: ? system/view/vid/vid-styles/text/font == "helvetica" Is it normal? |
However Mandriva, Suse/Novell, Fedora/RedHat, Ubuntu use the followings: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/truetype/feefont /usr/share/fonts/truetype/freefont I think it could be fixed. | |
Cyphre 10-Mar-2011 [4070] | font differences: ofcourse Arial doesn't exist on Linux...unless you install MS fonts. See my note about 'matching table'...such stuff is definitely needed. |
MaxV 10-Mar-2011 [4071x3] | Or an alert message "/usr/share/fonts/... not found!" |
Even helvetica doesn't exist! | |
Copyright Adobe 1994-1997 | |
Cyphre 10-Mar-2011 [4074] | MaxV: It's all about writin a proposal 'how to solve the font issues on Linux' then it can be discussed in some more serious way and in the end it can be implemented in future releases of R2. So there is nothing that blocks you to do the research and propose a solution. |
MaxV 10-Mar-2011 [4075] | OK |
Cyphre 10-Mar-2011 [4076] | But as I see from your wondering about different font names etc. I feel you are realizing this won't be an easy task ;) Anyway, if you want to be helpful, just go for it! |
Andreas 10-Mar-2011 [4077] | http://behdad.org/text/may provide some interesting background reading |
older newer | first last |