r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Linux] group for linux REBOL users

Anton
13-Nov-2006
[814]
What error message you getting ? Sure you've got the right binary 
?
Izkata
13-Nov-2006
[815x2]
Nevermind... It not running had more to do with me being a complete 
newb at Linux than anything else.

(Being so used to Windows, I didn't realize you had to use "./rebol" 
rather than just "rebol" to start it up)
I got distracted and forgot about it just after posting that, so 
I didn't notice Tomc's post until later on
Kaj
13-Nov-2006
[817x2]
That would be for /Core, wouldn't it? For /View, you can just click 
on it in the graphical user interface like you can with AltME
To start /Core without the ./ path, you would have to add the path 
to the $PATH environment variable. The ./ current directory is usually 
not in there for security reasons
Rebolek
14-Nov-2006
[819]
how can I set VIEW-ROOT ?
Anton
14-Nov-2006
[820]
Um.. is it the REBOL_HOME variable ? try search for that...
Rebolek
14-Nov-2006
[821]
Thanks, I'll try
Ammon
14-Nov-2006
[822x3]
Graham...  ODBC is supported on linux...  Here's on open source Firebird 
ODBC driver. http://www.xtgsystems.com/linux/ofbodbc/about.php
That's just one of the first links that I pulled off of Google, I 
didn't look very hard.
I set up a connection to MySQL from linux using MyODBC drivers back 
in 2002.  I'm sure if you wanted to you could get an ODBC set up 
running that would allow you to use Firebird from Linux.
Pekr
14-Nov-2006
[825]
Ammon - the thing might be, that maybe Linux version of Command does 
not support ODBC at all?
Ammon
14-Nov-2006
[826]
I was using a Linux version of Command to set it up.
Pekr
14-Nov-2006
[827]
Carl's answer - http://www.reboltalk.com/forum/index.php/topic,304.0.html
Ammon
14-Nov-2006
[828]
I know I had REBOL connecting to MySQL via ODBC on Linux...  I was 
playing with WINE heavily at the time though so I might have been 
running a windows version of REBOL on Linux to do it. ;-)
Graham
14-Nov-2006
[829]
since Command on Linux does not support ODBC, I think that must have 
been the case!
Pekr
14-Nov-2006
[830x5]
What is your take on Gnome vs KDE? I know many prefer Gnome, but 
from what I've read about KDE 4, I think I like their concept :-)
KDE seems to be fully vector based desktop in the future. Also there 
will be common app IPC mechanism called D-Bus.
Maybe we should use something like 'liquid to base VID+ IPC upon 
:-)
Hehe, KDE 4 designer (or Trolltech's dev, dunno), just pissed off 
some Cairo fanboys :-) http://zrusin.blogspot.com/
Conclusion from all those tests is that right now Qt is leaps ahead 
of any other vector graphics framework in terms of raw performance. 
Nothing comes even close. Qt's OpenGL engine is so fast it's basically 
unfair to compare anything else to it.
[unknown: 10]
14-Nov-2006
[835]
I liked KDE when it started with version 1.0, then it started to 
look like a PlayMobil/Lego Desktop, now its upto perfect and leaves 
gnome far behind, not only based on GUI but also based on pratical 
use ;-)... But it still eats a damm lot of resources... you need 
to tune , but thats fun ;-)
Kaj
15-Nov-2006
[836x3]
My view is that KDE has always had better internals, but Gnome has 
a better interface
Let's put it this way: if I think about the technology under the 
hood, I don't like using Gnome, but working with KDE's user interface 
makes me cringe all the time
By the way, D-BUS is currently used much more in Gnome than in KDE. 
Case in point: Gnome hardly had anything before, but KDE has to move 
away from its own DCOP IPC
Rebolek
15-Nov-2006
[839]
i'm using xfce and it's much better than KDE or Gnome (at least from 
my POV). Not so bloated, fast and configurable enough.
Henrik
15-Nov-2006
[840x2]
Gnome vs. KDE: I gave up on KDE ages ago. It has pretty good underpinnings, 
but the philosophy of cramming every possible feature into the GUI 
just makes it a nightmare to use. I don't know about KDE4, so I won't 
say much about that.

Gnome has a much better interface, but still a far way to go. It's 
exactly the opposite of KDE. I wish the two would go together and 
create a new desktop, based on KDE's underpinnings and Gnome's GUI.
But for serious work I prefer WindowMaker with GNUstep apps.
Kaj
16-Nov-2006
[842]
Well, you know where the best of both worlds is to be had ;-)
CharlesS
18-Nov-2006
[843x3]
how do i set the network server for emstp on linux ?
oops i see
hmm, how do i set it to use local sendmail ?
Ingo
18-Nov-2006
[846]
Well, you don't ... rebol does not support sending email using sendmail, 
but

if you have a version with command-shell support ( call ) you can 
probably create the command line to call sendmail yourself ... I 
don't know how to do this, though.
Anton
19-Nov-2006
[847]
CALL was freed for use in unlicensed Rebol/View some time ago.
Kaj
19-Nov-2006
[848x2]
I think interfacing with sendmail via the command line would be through 
the standard "mail" command, if sendmail is properly configured as 
standard MTA
The alternative would be to make sendmail listen on the local loopback 
network address, so you could use the REBOL send function
Graham
7-Dec-2006
[850x4]
Linux newbie here.
Downloaded vmplayer, and a Fedora 6 core image.  Run the Fedora, 
and then downloaded Rebol core for Linux libc
when I try to run Rebol, nothing happens.  The permissions say it 
is an executable though.
Is this the wrong version for Fedora ?
Alan
7-Dec-2006
[854x3]
Graham, I use Mandriva and dled the debian version and it works
or on a side note,try this new distro    http://www.ulteo.com/main/download.php
it was made by the guy who started the Mandrake distro and then got 
fired when Mandriva took over
Graham
7-Dec-2006
[857x3]
Alan, I'm running this under Windows so need to find a Vmware appliance 
..
Ok, found a Mandriva appliance .. downloading it.
900Mb later .. no go.  The Mandriva Vmware appliance just keeps cycling 
on me. :)
Kaj
7-Dec-2006
[860x3]
Do
ldd rebol
to see what libraries it needs, then see if you have them installed
Graham
7-Dec-2006
[863]
Thanks.  It says libstdc++.so.5 not found ... everything else is 
found.