r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[AGG] to discus new Rebol/View with AGG

Gregg
12-Jul-2005
[384]
I believe that's a known issue Anton.
DideC
12-Jul-2005
[385]
Yes, known issue.
Anton
12-Jul-2005
[386x3]
ok, so I assume Cyphre is on to it already.
Shadwolf, you will find it much easier to work from this style:
do http://www.lexicon.net/antonr/rebol/gui/demo-direction-pointer.r
Cyphre
13-Jul-2005
[389]
Anton, yes, this is known issue. This will be fixed in the next version.
DideC
13-Jul-2005
[390]
Anton:

>> do http://www.lexicon.net/antonr/rebol/gui/demo-direction-pointer.r
** Script Error: direction-pointer-style has no value
** Where: do-facets
** Near: direction-pointer-style
Cyphre
13-Jul-2005
[391x2]
Shadwolf: I analyzed your SVG example with nested MATRIX command 
and found little bug in matrix calculation. Thanks for pointing this 
out! I know the solution so it will be fixed in the next Rebol View 
build.
Note: The bug is related only to MATRIX command. TRANSFORM/TRANSLATE/ROTATE/SCALE 
works ok.
Anton
13-Jul-2005
[393]
Dide, I think it failed to load direction-pointer.r file. Just try 
again until it works ! :)
DideC
13-Jul-2005
[394]
Hum, your script search for the file in our Rebsite index.r file, 
so I must see it in the Desktop, isn't it ?

If yes, I see a %direction-box.r, but no %direction-pointer.r icon.
Anton
13-Jul-2005
[395x2]
No. It is not indexed. Actually, quite a lot of my scripts are not 
indexed :-(
(but I am working on that).
DideC
13-Jul-2005
[397]
Sorry but tried 20 times and still the error
Anton
13-Jul-2005
[398x2]
foreach url [
http://www.lexicon.net/antonr/rebol/gui/demo-direction-pointer.r
http://www.lexicon.net/antonr/rebol/gui/direction-pointer.r
][print [url mold info? url]]
http://www.lexicon.net/antonr/rebol/gui/demo-direction-pointer.r
make object! [
    size: 1333
    date: 13-Jul-2005/2:01:33
    type: 'file
]

http://www.lexicon.net/antonr/rebol/gui/direction-pointer.rmake 
object! [
    size: 2033
    date: 13-Jul-2005/2:01:25
    type: 'file
]
DideC
13-Jul-2005
[400]
It works at home :)
I wonder why it didn't at work!
shadwolf
14-Jul-2005
[401]
Cyphre Great !!!! I'm happy to have found a difficult bug regarding 
MATRIX in AGG/DRAW :) I hope this will be solved as soon as possible. 
I all cases tahnk you to have take the time to scout my problems 
:)
Anton
14-Jul-2005
[402]
mmm weird :)
shadwolf
14-Jul-2005
[403x5]
instead of using matrix i can translate it into scale rotate and 
translate value so ...
????
SVG matrix (a b c d e f) -> AGG scale [a d] rotate [b c] translate 
[e f] can I do this ???
matrix is 3X3
like that :
[a c e]
[b d f]
[0 0 1]

where couple AD = scaling BC= rotating EF = translating
DideC
15-Jul-2005
[408]
Can't 'transform be used for doing all that ?
Anton
18-Jul-2005
[409]
Dide, perhaps at work you have not updated your reboltech index.r 
file for a while, and it still points to my old rebsite.
Try this at work:
	load-thru/update http://www.reboltech.com/index.r
DideC
19-Jul-2005
[410]
It was probably that ;-)
shadwolf
20-Jul-2005
[411x2]
Don't know if transform REBOL/AGG command can do this 

I not enoght skilled in AGG to answer ... I will try to use transform 
instead of matrix
it's yet a kind of miracle for me totally noob in AGG and in SVG 
to have arrived to the actual point of the svg renderer. Lot of code 
and ideas have helped me a lot Ashley is trully a idea fountain. 
Those idea only claim to be worked again and again to arrive to a 
very very good and usefull tool
DideC
21-Jul-2005
[413]
Transform does rotation, scale and translation in one command :
TRANSFORM       angle [decimal!]
                center [pair!]
                scale-x [decimal!]
                scale-y [decimal!]
                translation [pair!]
Cyphre
21-Jul-2005
[414x3]
shadwolf: you cannot use partial matrix blocks on SCALE/ROTATE/TRANSLATE 
commands.
The problem of converting back already defined transformtion matrix 
is that you don't actually know what opearations(rotate,scale,translate 
etc.)  has been applied on the matrix values. ie transformation matrix 
is ireversible.
So I think there is no method how to 'extract' translation, rotation 
and scale from matrix content(correct me if I'm wrong)
JaimeVargas
21-Jul-2005
[417]
I agree with you, there needs to be some sort of record on how the 
operations occured. I think there is big number of combinations (rotation, 
translation and scale). That could produce the same matrix, so decomposition 
is not easy if the only think know is the Matrix itself.
Robert
21-Jul-2005
[418]
It all depends on the order of the single tranformations. So you 
need to keep track of the applied tranformation matrices and the 
order of tech transformation, than it's possible to derive the inverse 
tranformation.
JaimeVargas
21-Jul-2005
[419]
Agreed.
Cyphre
21-Jul-2005
[420]
yes, that's why the new DRAW dialect has PUSH [ ] command. It 'stores' 
the current transformation matrix into internal matrix stack. You 
can apply other transformations in the PUSH block or even reset the 
current matrix but after 'leaving' the PUSH command block you have 
active back the 'stored' matrix. Very handy for nested transformations.
DideC
21-Jul-2005
[421]
So there is no more POP command ?
shadwolf
22-Jul-2005
[422x4]
I thought matrix was only a way to merge scale rotate and translate 
values...
Cyphre have you an idea when the bug with matrix will be solved ?
same 4 gradients :) ?
Didec work like a layer difinition and manager

Using push the matrix or other trnasformation information are apply 
only on the push  block content. outside the push block the matrix 
informations are not affected
Robert
22-Jul-2005
[426]
If I use TEXT I can specify the offset. Is there a way to specify 
the size as well and that the rest is clipped?
Gabriele
22-Jul-2005
[427]
not afaik, but i think you could use the clip command.
Robert
22-Jul-2005
[428]
Hm... but I don't know how big a text will render. And I can't referr 
to the text to clip it.
Anton
22-Jul-2005
[429x5]
I have a feeling that draw TEXT is still using old draw code, and 
not merged so well with AGG yet.
I noticed that draw text offset doesn't scale:
view layout [box navy effect [draw [scale 0.1 0.1 text "hello" 40x40]]]
I also noticed line-width doesn't scale:
view layout [b: box 200x200 effect [draw [scale 1 1 pen 192.0.0 line-width 
32 line 10x10 190x190]] scroller 200x20 [b/effect/draw/scale: b/effect/draw/3: 
face/data show b]]
No luck using TRANSFORM instead of SCALE either: