World: r3wp
[Web] Everything web development related
older newer | first last |
Pekr 13-Jan-2007 [1295x2] | should I create sitemap in my google account for the particular domain? |
example - try site:http://www.jablunkovsko.czbowling .... in google - only one link will show, whereas I would like the result to include (go to menu) "sport a relaxace"/bowling .... | |
Henrik 13-Jan-2007 [1297] | pekr, link to site is dead |
Gabriele 13-Jan-2007 [1298] | petr, why not just including a simple html links somewhere in the page? you can even hide it with js, so that a user does not see the links, but a spider will. |
Pekr 13-Jan-2007 [1299] | yes, that should work ... although I can imagine hiding the links ... I will try to look at sitemap protocol - seems to be a standard ... |
Sunanda 13-Jan-2007 [1300] | Javascript only links will stop pretty much every spider.....So you won't appear in many search engines at all. You will also be breaking a lot of people's assistive technologies (like screen readers for visually disabled people). Best to have a site that is fully navigable via plain HTML links. Then add the clever stuff on top of that. Google's advice: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769 http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/ *** A high score here usually means you have a person-friendly and spider friendly website: http://www.cynthiasays.com/ |
Chris 13-Jan-2007 [1301] | Also, look up 'Progressive Enhancement' or 'Hijax', both describe techniques consistent with Sunanda's advice. |
Pekr 13-Jan-2007 [1302] | thanks for advices - initially my friend maight use Gabriele's advice of storing hidden links into index.html somewhere, so that search engine can index the site properly. |
Sunanda 13-Jan-2007 [1303] | But bear in mind the *specific* advice on the Google page: <<Avoid hidden text or hidden links.>> |
PeterWood 13-Jan-2007 [1304x3] | Is building and submitting a purpose built crawler page an outdated technique? |
It must be easy enough to generate one in Rebol | |
..but it seems to be dissaproved of by Google | |
Sunanda 14-Jan-2007 [1307] | Search engines like to index things a user can see. Thye get suspicious of anything that appears to be built just for the.....No surprising given how much they have been gamed by SERPS spammers. Having a human-readable site map has the same effect as a crawler page *and* taks you a long way towards having a site that is navigable by people under any conditions. *** The google-approved method of doing a crawler page is to use what they call a sitemap: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/topic.py?topic=8476 Someone could easily modify Carl's site-checker to emit a google sitemap: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?script=site-check.r |
Oldes 16-Jan-2007 [1308] | How to reset variables sent from a form using POST method without redirecting into new page? I mean how to prevent, that using reload will resend the values again. I usualy just set location to other page after processing, but now I have case when I need to display informations without change of the location. I think I've seen somewhere that it's possible using http response, but cannot find it:( |
Chris 16-Jan-2007 [1309] | I'm not sure of a single http header designed for this purpose. There are cache controls, but how long to set them for? Or etags/if-none-match, but would that prevent the browser's resend warning? Or a token value in your form that expires after one submission, though also would not prevent the resend warning. Or sessions? |
Oldes 16-Jan-2007 [1310] | never mind, I will do it in the way I do it usually, that means redirect to other page after processing of the upload |
Volker 16-Jan-2007 [1311] | if there is nothing, you could id the page and block further replies with the same id. |
Chris 16-Jan-2007 [1312] | Volker, that is etags... |
Volker 16-Jan-2007 [1313] | i guess i am clueless and beter stop spamming. what is etags?^^ |
Henrik 16-Jan-2007 [1314] | compare the post values to the last sent post values? |
Chris 16-Jan-2007 [1315] | Etags should work like this: client requests a resource, server returns resource and etag header. Client again requests resource, but this time sends if-none-match header with etag value and server can then decide whether to process the request or send 304 not changed. I haven't explored this much so don't know how well it's supported -- I'm not sure how appropriate the solution is, but would involve the least server activity. |
Volker 16-Jan-2007 [1316] | ah |
Oldes 16-Jan-2007 [1317] | the problem is, that if you are posting large file, it's not too good, as all file is first uploaded again and than you can decide, if you want it to store for example. I though I sow something, but maybe it was just a fata morgana, I thing, that the best is the redirect. My problem is, that I'm trying to connect on database, which was not designed by me, so there is no crypted id for the data I upload, just incremental integer, which I don't want to use, as I would give chance to everybody go thru the data just inserting other numbers. I have to take a risk, modify the original database adding ne column with crypted id and redirect to the uploaded data using this id. And hope, that I will find and modifie all places, where is this database used:( |
Pekr 16-Jan-2007 [1318x2] | reload resends post data? I thought that to resend post data you have to press submit button :-) |
nevertheless now I understand why I sometimes get double posts with some chat boards :-) | |
Sunanda 16-Jan-2007 [1320] | It depends on which browser you are using -- they have different behaviours in this area. |
CharlesS 24-Jan-2007 [1321x4] | Hmm, im using http-tools , I login to a page which sends a cookie which I then have to send back everytime, however the cookie seems to expire after one post :/ |
anyone user http-tools off of rebol.org ? | |
REBOL's POST , GET etc really need re-working -- for an IT aware language posting to websites id ridicoulously hard | |
is* | |
Joe 24-Jan-2007 [1325] | charles, welcome to reality ! In theory rebol supports many protocols but in practice the support is incomplete and it has been incomplete for a long time. check rebol.org, there are several patches for cookies support |
Graham 24-Jan-2007 [1326x2] | I wrote http-tools, but haven't used it for years. |
you normally need to send the cookie each time ... that's what browsers do | |
CharlesS 24-Jan-2007 [1328] | yes, I am sending it each time, but for some reason it seems to only like the first request, after that it expires , or something else is going wrong ... Id really like to see a client with transparent support for cookies |
Tomc 24-Jan-2007 [1329] | are you getting a redirect from the second page ... that is followed without the cookie |
Graham 24-Jan-2007 [1330x2] | oldes did something on transparent support .. |
so did I .. but that was long ago. | |
Oldes 25-Jan-2007 [1332] | Yes, I did, and if you scroll a little bit up, you can find the link easilly - it's in big yellow block of text:) And I agree, that it would be good to have cookies support directly in Rebol, as my cookies-daemon is relly hard hack I cannot be sure that it would not rewrite some future http protocol updates |
Pekr 13-Feb-2007 [1333x5] | Has anyone tried to solve at least some basic anti-spam form protection? I mean - those numbers/letters you have to rewrite to your form field, in order to be processed? Will it work with rebface at least, if my Linux server has no X-Win installed? |
I want to do some small post-card system for my friend. He can't program much and adapted small php solution, but that solution is so basic, that it even does not randomize postcard number in presented link ... so you can cange your url and get access to someone's else message. That is imo unacceptable. | |
What I really like is www.view-card.com system. It is able to embedd images directly into email's body (not an attachement), but I found out, that most freemails has html email displaying turned off by default .... | |
had anyone done an email address validation according to rfc 2822? Well, I mean email adress part? Our to-email "whatever-stupidity-you-write-here423423423-rebol-considers-being-an-meail@{{}}}]//" is kind of funny :-) | |
I thought datatypes should be usefull, and there is exactly precise description of what is, and what is not email, so how Rebol can simplify it so much? | |
Sunanda 13-Feb-2007 [1338] | Not quite an email address validator, but the REBOL.org uses an email address spotter [contributed by Andrew Martin] to find and obsfucate email addresses in ML messages, etc. You could use the same basic parse patterns to identify / validate email addresses. I haven't checked RFC 822 in detail, so it is likely that Andrew's code is more liberal than the actual spec, but it could be a starter. Would you like a copy of the function? |
Pekr 13-Feb-2007 [1339x2] | yes, of course ... you can send it to my mail address, or point me to some link ... |
thanks a lot :-) | |
Graham 13-Feb-2007 [1341x4] | I wrote an email validator .. which works by doing an smtp challenge. |
http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?script=email-check.r | |
it's probably a reason why my spam has increased on gmail :( | |
Note to Sunada ... licence (english) and license (american) spellings appear on the same page :) | |
older newer | first last |