World: r3wp

Doesn't work with Firefox though

http://blog.thejit.org/javascript-information-visualization-toolkit-jit/

My friend who is building some basic websites was asked by his client 
for the search facility. So far he used Google and its: site:your-domain.com 
feature, but the client would like the output to be customised. So 
here goes the questions:


- does google licence allow customising such output? E.g. wrapping 
it in another color, etc., so that it would look like the rest of 
the client site?

- is it easily technically possible, to parse the result? I mean 
- I can imagine parsing the output, even page paginator, then generating 
custom output. But maybe there is some other solution for that? Maybe 
some google api?

I think you are looking for the API.

For customisation, Yahoo have better Apis.

There was a Google search API (using SOAP), but they withdrew it. 
This page  may lead to alternatives:
http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/clientlibs.html

Their replacement appears to be an Ajax widget.  I'm not sure how 
well that would integrate...

I think I will try CGI and parse ... hopefully I will not break some 
license, albeit I fear that I will be :-)

http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/-- Google host Javascript libraries.

I'm searching for a good free log-file analyzer (whatever that means 
;-)). Any hints? I know:

- Analog
- Webializer

But both are not that good IMO.

Oh, and it should run on the web-server.

this one is pretty complete, not free but you can get a new trial 
key every 30 days http://summary.net/

Rober, 

what kind of logs are u looking at?


if it is for web traffic stuffs, have you look at Google Analytics?

If it is not, just ignore my comments.

Hi Robert  I switched from analog to awstats  about 4 years ago and 
am still with it.

but it also has it's shortfalls.  one of my coworkers was experimenting 
with a timing plugin this spring

Will, thx, never heard about this one.

Yeksoon, yes, web traffic. I heard about Googly Analytics but thought 
you need to add special stuff. Isn't this the case?

Tomc, AWStats is what I currently try to setup.

Google Analytics requires you to add a few lines of Javascript to 
every page that you want GA to track.
That limits the GA stats to user-agents that execute javascript.

Ah, ok, that was why I don't like it that much.

.

I can definitely see:
	none? port/locals/headers/Accept-Ranges
but is it ever true:
	"none" = port/locals/headers/Accept-Ranges
?

Well I shouldn't be so lazy. Let me start collecting empirical data 
...

foreach url [

 http://brokenbeatassault.com/depot/files/BBA_MusicShow_Podcast_001_March_Safire.mp3
	http://dlsvr05.asus.com/pub/ASUS/vga/nVidia/nv16921_Win2KXP.zip
	http://debeveiligingsupdate.nl/audio/bevupd_0003.mp3

 http://audio.wnyc.org/radiolab_podcast/radiolab_podcast501choice.mp3

 http://ftp.iinet.net.au/pub/ubuntu-releases/kubuntu/8.04.1/MD5SUMS

 http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/dan_gilbert_researches_happiness.html
	http://events.ccc.de/congress/2008/wiki/Streaming

 http://sites.romkids.org/virgill/albums/Bestof PC Demoscene/like a childbirth.mp3
	http://rockfactory.us/files/rebol_song.mp3
][
	port: open/binary/direct url
	print [mold port/locals/headers/Content-Length url]
	close port
]

Only two hosts returned #[none]:
	www.ted.com
	events.ccc.de
and the rest returned strings of lengths, eg: "4279194".

I should test more urls to feel more certain. (Or read http specs... 
hmm.. which gives better results ?)

#[none] means that the header was not there. if it's there, then 
it's going to be a string.

Yes, that makes sense. I think HTTP/1.0 servers are likely to not 
bother sending Accept-Ranges (thus it remains #[none]), while HTTP/1.1 
servers are likely to send it (thus set to either "none" or "bytes").

Anyone know what the proper way to parse this style of URL is?  Opera 
spits it out.  


http://sitecheck2.opera.com/?host=www.rebol.net&hdn=SDbXzuPvK4tsiGnHOia5dA==

Steve, could you be a little more specific.  There are a lot ways 
to parse your parse question :)


For example, are you asking what the "?" and the "&" mean in the 
URL?  Or am I taking too literal?

is it the last "==" which is confusing?  or the encoded data?

The == looks like padding on encoded data to me.

Though I'm not sure:

>> to string!  debase/base "SDbXzuPvK4tsiGnHOia5dA==" 64

== "H6????+?l?i?:&?t"

I asked a broad question because I didn't know what answer I need 
... ;-)


Specifically, this comes out of Opera and when I parse it to HTTP, 
I don't know if I should make a Request of:

Host: sitecheck2.opera.com
Path: /
Target: ?host=www.rebol.net&hdn=SDbXzuPvK4tsiGnHOia5dA==


or some other way, like perhaps Path: none ? and Target: /?host=www.rebol.net&hdn=SDbXzuPvK4tsiGnHOia5dA==

...and at a qualitative level, I think this might be used as a referer...Opera 
does this from the Home Page button.  I don't get it from other browsers.

The message about tables in here at 31-Jan-2005 2:42:06 AM wrecks 
the AltME tables when it sends its output the the Web Browser.  I 
have seen this before. (press the Print icon in AltME and look at 
this message group in the browser, table lines are missing)

Youzer...re-installing Opera 9.63 fixed the problem.  Now it works 
perfectly.  My guess is that the sitecheck2.opera.com was revalidated 
by the new install process, so the site allowed a connection.  Dunno, 
just a guess.  A couple days of trying to fix my code went into that 
unsure lesson.

:)

Please post the Table bug bug to Feedback, thanks.

not escaping html tags is quite serious bug.

Anyone have experience using Oliverier Auverlot's Magic! I have tried 
several times to get it up and running but never got there...

Also, Is there any advantage to it over RSP?

you can ask on french BBS (even in english) http://www.digicamsoft.com/cgi-bin/rebelBB.cgi
Several users use Magic

Thanks, I've tried about 4 times over the last few years and keep 
giving up. The config files keep screwing me. tried under XP, 98, 
using WAMP and under Ubuntu...

Did you manage to make rebol cgi works?
I mean, is the webserver able to run .cgi script with rebol?

Rebol/core need to be installed on the server, chmoded and you must 
have put the right sheeband at the beginning of the .cgi script.

A simple .cgi script like this one is a good test :

#!/usr/bin/rebol -cs
rebol []

print "Content-type: text/html^/"
print {
<<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD><TITLE>Rebol CGI test page</TITLE></HEAD>
<BODY>}

print ["Server date time is:" now]

print {</BODY></HTML>}

Then, when this script runs well, put the same sheeband at the beginning 
of the magic.cgi file.

Then I have a file test.rhtml (handler for .rhtml must be configured 
in the webserver) with this content to test magic :

<html><head>Test Magic</head>
<body>
Magic fonctionne t'il ?<P/>
<REBOL>
	print [

  "<b>Oui il fonctionne !</b><BR>Date et heure du serveur : <i>" now 
  </i> <P/>
		"Configuration actuelle :<BR>"
		"m-library-path : " m-library-path <BR>
		"m-session-path : " m-sessions-path <BR>
		"curdir : " curdir <BR>
		"home : " system/options/home <BR>
	]
</REBOL>
</body>
</html>

I'll try those suggestions. It's a bit more methodical than what 
I was doing...
Thanks, Dide.

Did you consider QuarterMaster instead? I used to want to go with 
Magic!, but QM is a much more modern design