World: r3wp
[Web] Everything web development related
| older newer | first last |
| Reichart 28-Dec-2009 [1695] | Isn't the WHOLE thing simply insane? After all these years, there is not a tool that allows both programmers and artists to work on the SAME data? All strange... |
| Pekr 28-Dec-2009 [1696] | Xara pretends to be such a tool, but otoh I did not found, how to easily adjust using code ..... http://www.xara.com/eu/products/webdesigner/features/ |
| Geomol 28-Dec-2009 [1697] | Many of the problems arise, because designers/developers/programmers try to make html do, what it wasn't supposed to do in the first place. When making a movie, one might start out by drawing a storyboard. Later in the process, a camera is used to shoot some film, and in the end a story is told, that may or may not be close to the original storyboard. But it works, because the final output (images within a frame) is the same kind of thoughts that goes into creating the storyboard (images within a frame). Designers think in the line of the final output, but html isn't wysiwyg, and the html technology might not be well suited for the ideas, the designer has. So problems arise. ... Or something. ;-) |
| Robert 28-Dec-2009 [1698x2] | I use Balsamico for my mock-ups. I like the tool a lot. And it can convert mock-ups to code via emitters. |
Not tested yet but that's the right idea. | |
| Mchean 28-Dec-2009 [1700] | Balsamiq Mockups Robert ? |
| Robert 29-Dec-2009 [1701] | Yes, it's an ARI tool. Very nice and simple to use. |
| Will 29-Jan-2010 [1702x2] | a better web is coming, just got this from google: Dear Google Apps admin, In order to continue to improve our products and deliver more sophisticated features and performance, we are harnessing some of the latest improvements in web browser technology. ÊThis includes faster JavaScript processing and new standards like HTML5. ÊAs a result, over the course of 2010, we will be phasing out support for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 as well as other older browsers that are not supported by their own manufacturers. We plan to begin phasing out support of these older browsers on the Google Docs suite and the Google Sites editor on March 1, 2010. ÊAfter that point, certain functionality within these applications may have higher latency and may not work correctly in these older browsers. Later in 2010, we will start to phase out support for these browsers for Google Mail and Google Calendar. Google Apps will continue to support Internet Explorer 7.0 and above, Firefox 3.0 and above, Google Chrome 4.0 and above, and Safari 3.0 and above. Starting next week, users on these older browsers will see a message in Google Docs and the Google Sites editor explaining this change and asking them to upgrade their browser. ÊWe will also alert you again closer to March 1 to remind you of this change. In 2009, the Google Apps team delivered more than 100 improvements to enhance your product experience. ÊWe are aiming to beat that in 2010 and continue to deliver the best and most innovative collaboration products for businesses. Thank you for your continued support! Sincerely, The Google Apps team |
no more IE6 headaces 8-) | |
| Ashley 30-Jan-2010 [1704] | Interesting that Google will probably have more success in getting people to upgrade IE than MS! ;) |
| Graham 30-Jan-2010 [1705] | Hmm.... it's not google search though .. |
| Sunanda 13-Feb-2010 [1706] | People having trouble because facebook not the first google result for [facebook login] http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2010/02/12/google_de_facto_internet_gateway/ |
| Paul 21-Feb-2010 [1707x2] | I'm creating a forum and using R3 CGI to output a page. How do we send the Doctype to page? |
Or rather how do we generate the DTD on output of the CGI | |
| Sunanda 21-Feb-2010 [1709] | Simple PRINT the doctype before the HTML, eg print <!doctype html> print <html lang="en"> print <head> etc |
| Paul 21-Feb-2010 [1710] | Yeah, I tried that. Maybe I did something wrong. I'm going to try that again. |
| Sunanda 21-Feb-2010 [1711] | If you look at the source of www.rebol.com you can see it done as simply as possible. |
| Paul 21-Feb-2010 [1712x4] | Alright I had done this before but it must be something broke with the div centering. |
finally I got it to work!!! | |
IE8 required the DTD spec in order make the div center. | |
looks good on Chrome also. | |
| Sunanda 21-Feb-2010 [1716] | Yeah, IE has different ideas on when to go to quirks mode. |
| Paul 21-Feb-2010 [1717x2] | Yeah I couuldn't figure out why I couldn't get the main container div to center on IE8. Kept messing with it and then read where you had to declare the DTD for it to center. |
I was going crazy because Chrome was centering it just fine. | |
| Ashley 2-Apr-2010 [1719] | Code snippet to "inline" an image:
string: trim/lines form read/binary file
remove back tail string
ajoin [{<img src="data:image/} next suffix? file ";base64," skip
string 5 {">}]
Adds about 30-50% to image size but reduces server fetches (important
for wireless access).
|
| Maxim 2-Apr-2010 [1720] | COOL! I didn't know we could do this. |
| Gabriele 3-Apr-2010 [1721] | use ENBASE instead of trim/lines form etc. |
| Ashley 3-Apr-2010 [1722] | Ah, even simpler then:
ajoin [{<img src="data:image/} next suffix? file ";base64," enbase
read/binary file {">}]
Thanx.
|
| Will 3-Apr-2010 [1723x2] | remember to take care of client caching issues 8-) |
and obviously you can have all the image data in a javascript file as well (for which you probably already have a longer cache expire set up) | |
| Chris 3-Apr-2010 [1725] | I think the only downside of a data: url is it's not supported in IE, iirc. |
| Paul 1-May-2010 [1726] | Anyone else use Concrete5 CMS? Pretty good stuff. |
| Graham 11-May-2010 [1727x2] | Is there anyway to delete wiki spam off rebol.net? If you just revert the page, the spam is still accessible to search engines and still gets indexed so the spammer still gets what they want. |
ie. it remains in the revision history | |
| Andreas 11-May-2010 [1729x2] | the history pages are not supposed to be indexed |
and they have `<meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow" />` in their head to that effect, so simply reverting the change should be fine | |
| Graham 11-May-2010 [1731] | Except they are being read by my crawler .. |
| Andreas 11-May-2010 [1732] | the history pages being _read_ is fine, their content being _indexed_ is not :) |
| Graham 11-May-2010 [1733x4] | Perhaps it's just indexing the user names which are also drug names! http://129.33.196.33/search/?index=Default&query=albendazole&queryTimeout=3000&ref=http%3A%2F%2F129.33.196.33%3A80%2Fsearch%2F%3Fquery%3Dalbendazole%26queryTimeout%3D3000%26index%3DDefault |
Should I exclude these http://www.rebol.net/w/index.php*?? | |
excluding http://www.rebol.net/w/* | |
Finished now at 27k pages ... | |
| Maxim 11-May-2010 [1737] | you should also index other sites, like www.codeconscious.com/rebol which has the best complementary view information out there, . it has helped me on sooo many occasions. |
| Graham 11-May-2010 [1738x2] | Guess I could do ... but this is just to see if the engine is good enough. |
I've started to crawl Brett's site .. hope he doesn't mind! | |
| Maxim 11-May-2010 [1740] | that was an example, but there are others... reboltutorial, Nick's learn programing site, Olde's flash site, rebol.org, rebol weekly news links, etc etc... I think that having a unique source for all of that rich rebol content is very usefull for everyone. |
| Graham 11-May-2010 [1741x4] | Well as I said someone has to decide if the quality of the search engine is good enough or not. |
And if so, we need a permanent host for it | |
Anyone want to do some comparison searchs between google, and this? | |
Probably has to be Carl as he is the one with the issues! | |
| older newer | first last |