World: r3wp
[Web] Everything web development related
older newer | first last |
onetom 13-May-2011 [1863] | finally i dont have to start with turning off the bookmarks bar on a fresh install. most ppl dont use it anyway... and probably FF maker have *measuered* this. and giving more space for the content worth more than bookmarking |
Maxim 14-May-2011 [1864] | don't get me wrong, I like that FF is conscious about screen real estate.... its just that opening a window with no buttons, is a bit drastic. I hate pulldown menus because they are extremely slow. |
AdrianS 16-May-2011 [1865] | so why not use keyboard shortcuts? |
Maxim 18-May-2011 [1866] | bah, I've learnt so many keyboard shortcuts in my life (with a past in vfx and innumerable 3d & fx softwares ;-) that my memory for such things is pretty full. |
AdrianS 21-May-2011 [1867] | yeah, I know what you mean, but a browser is such a constantly used tool that a few shortcuts are worth memorizing, IMO |
onetom 25-May-2011 [1868] | http://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/ this seems to be some serious shit... the guy who is writing the angular.js framework can run 300 unit tests in 400ms on the 10K lines code base. |
Robert 2-Jun-2011 [1869] | I have a question regarding fonts on web-sites: Take a look at this one here: http://www.binaryage.com/ It uses a font called PLAY which I like a lot. This font wasn't installed on my system, but the web-site displayed it. It's even not one of the standard web fonts I know. Why does this work? |
Cyphre 2-Jun-2011 [1870] | I did just quick look at the site and it seems it uses this service http://fontdeck.com |
Robert 2-Jun-2011 [1871] | Seems to work via Google as well: http://www.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Play&subset=latin#code |
Cyphre 2-Jun-2011 [1872x2] | yes, the google api is probably using the fontdeck site internaly. |
Also such fonts will work properly only in newer browsers..the binariage site looks terribly in IE8 for example. | |
Robert 2-Jun-2011 [1874] | IE9 looks the same as Safari, no problems. |
Cyphre 2-Jun-2011 [1875] | I just noted that so you know. It depends how much you care about the backward compatibility etc. |
Robert 2-Jun-2011 [1876] | Yep... thx. It should work for most people of course. |
Kaj 2-Jun-2011 [1877] | The Googel Webfonts home page drives my Firefox 3.5 into a crash loop |
onetom 3-Jun-2011 [1878x4] | im wondering what is the best way of providing permalinks for mechanical parts, like pipe fittings. i'd like to provide a catalog of them for a couple of companies. each company has their own part number system which unambigously identifies a product. i would expose a description page about these as: /company/part-number |
it would however look cryptic and wouldn't empasize what is that page about, so we were thinking about attaching a slug to it, to help human usage and search engines too. | |
Q1: im not very sure about how much more effective from a SEO point of view to have a slug in the URL as opposed to keywords in meta tags and the same description as in the title of the page for example. | |
Q2: would it be okay to add the slug as an extra path level, like stackoverflow.com does? | |
Kaj 3-Jun-2011 [1882] | Search engines don't use meta keywords anymore |
onetom 3-Jun-2011 [1883] | Q3: do u know any article describing best practices regarding permalinks/slugs? |
Kaj 3-Jun-2011 [1884x2] | A structured description in a title tag would be OK, but it seems that URLs help extra |
I use a unique identifier such as a date, followed by a textual description in the rest of the URL | |
onetom 3-Jun-2011 [1886] | it's not a news site, so there might be issues with the unqueness of the slug and other things like, i might need to display the nominal size of the part which is a fraction in many cases, lile 1-1/4" which wouldnt read nice at all if i have to replace the slash. the dbl quote might be okay to omit though |
Kaj 3-Jun-2011 [1887x2] | Yes, readability is a problem, so URLs are often more optimised for search engines than for human readers |
1/4" would be 0.25-inch | |
PeterWood 3-Jun-2011 [1889] | No, it;s two hoon in this part of the world. |
Oldes 3-Jun-2011 [1890] | http://typekit.com/ |
onetom 3-Jun-2011 [1891] | do u specify the slug manually or let some automatism hint u with a possibility 1st? |
Kaj 3-Jun-2011 [1892x2] | I just have an extra field short-name |
But you have to train your users on it | |
Tim 9-Oct-2011 [1894x4] | Well, I've been using rebol for 11 years, but never have used altme for support. But I have a |
OOPS! I have a problem send email with authentication required. using the following | |
set-net [[tim-:-mydomain-:-com] mail.mydomain.com mail.mydomain.com none none none [tim-:-mydomain-:-com] '*******'] where 'mydomain' replaces my domain and asterisk obfuscate the password, if I send a message I get the following : connecting to: mail.mydomain.com ** User Error: Server error: tcp 503 AUTH command used when not advertised ** Near: smtp-port: open [scheme: 'esmtp] either only | |
Have I used set-net properly? :) the ML appears to have died. I find this very cumbersome for sharing code. Any other place for support? | |
Henrik 9-Oct-2011 [1898] | Tim, click the pencil, then you can easily share multiple lines of code. |
Kaj 9-Oct-2011 [1899] | http://rebolforum.com |
Tim 9-Oct-2011 [1900x4] | got it Kaj and been there. Will use. |
And thanks Henrik. I see the pencil. Any ideas anyone? | |
Following is error trace. | |
>> send [tim-:-akwebsoft-:-com] "testing rebol" Net-log: ["Opening" "tcp" "for" "esmtp"] connecting to: mail.akwebsoft.com Net-log: [none "220"] Net-log: {220-host266.hostmonster.com ESMTP Exim 4.76 #1 Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:45:39 -0600 } Net-log: {220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, } Net-log: "220 and/or bulk e-mail." Net-log: [["HELO" system/network/host] "250"] Net-log: {250 host266.hostmonster.com Hello bart [64.4.232.191]} Net-log: ["AUTH CRAM-MD5" "334"] Net-log: ["WARNING! Using plain authentication."] Net-log: [{AUTH PLAIN dGltQGFrd2Vic29mdC5jb20AdGltQGFrd2Vic29mdC5jb20AdEhqMTk0OSc=} "235" ] ** User Error: Server error: tcp 503 AUTH command used when not advertised ** Near: smtp-port: open [scheme: 'esmtp] either only | |
GrahamC 9-Oct-2011 [1904x4] | The rebol client should send "EHLO" and not "HELO" |
As a result, the servere does not advertise any authentication methods | |
Maybe you're using an old esmtp protocol .. as mine sends EHLO | |
>> set-net [[tim-:-akwebsoft-:-com] mail.akwebsoft.com mail.akwebsoft.com none none none [tim-:-akwebsoft-:-com] "****" ] >> send [tim-:-akwebsoft-:-com] "testing" Net-log: ["Opening" "tcp" "for" "esmtp"] connecting to: mail.akwebsoft.com Net-log: [none "220"] Net-log: {220-host266.hostmonster.com ESMTP Exim 4.76 #1 Sun, 09 Oct 2011 12:00:11 -0600 } Net-log: {220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, } Net-log: "220 and/or bulk e-mail." Net-log: [["EHLO" system/network/host] "250"] Net-log: {250-host266.hostmonster.com Hello Graham-PC [203.97.98.9]} Net-log: "250-SIZE 52428800" Net-log: "250-PIPELINING" Net-log: "250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN" Net-log: "250-STARTTLS" Net-log: "250 HELP" Net-log: ["Supported auth methods:" [plain login]] Net-log: ["WARNING! Using AUTH LOGIN."] Net-log: [ "AUTH LOGIN" "334" ] Net-log: "334 VXNlcm5hbWU6" Net-log: ["dGltQGFrd2Vic29mdC5jb20=" "334"] Net-log: "334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6" Net-log: ["KioqKg==" "235"] ** User Error: Server error: tcp 535 Incorrect authentication data ** Near: smtp-port: open [scheme: 'esmtp] either only | |
Tim 9-Oct-2011 [1908] | Not sure what to do about the 'old protocol'. Is there a way to change it? I'm using 2.6.2.4.2 |
GrahamC 9-Oct-2011 [1909x2] | 2.7.8.3.1 |
Get the latest esmtp protocol | |
Tim 9-Oct-2011 [1911] | Where? Huh, I thought it was compiled in.. |
GrahamC 9-Oct-2011 [1912] | So? You can run it again to replace the encapped version |
older newer | first last |