r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[SDK]

nve
1-Jan-2011
[1729]
So, user has to pay 750 $ to generate app for Linux, MacOSX, Windows 
?!
Is this affordable for personnal developpers ?
BrianH
1-Jan-2011
[1730]
I don't know if there are cross-platform discounts.
GrahamC
1-Jan-2011
[1731x2]
There used to be ...
and the one for bsd is free :)
Claude
2-Jan-2011
[1733]
and 2.7.8 ????
GrahamC
2-Jan-2011
[1734]
there's always a lag between the 2 release and the SDK.  And these 
days there's a charge for updates for the SDK.
BrianH
2-Jan-2011
[1735x2]
The SDK came out at the same time as the regular release, before 
the blog. Windows only for the moment.
Apparently we might be getting even more cool stuff for the SDK than 
have already been posted, so you might want to wait on the SDK for 
a bit.
amacleod
5-Jan-2011
[1737x6]
I discovered what is causing my program to hang in windows 7....something 
to do with a "Call/output" command i'm using:
ver: copy ""call/output "ver" ver
ver: copy ""
call/output "ver" ver

works in xp and vista
Strangly it would run the first time on install (sdk version) but 
never there after, and it would not run from script.
call/output does not seem to work at all on win 7 ... is this a known 
prob?
Just wondering if there is a way to have an sdk app run in admin 
mode (without the user doing it)? For syncing purposes I had offered 
to auto correct time nad it worked for XP but windows 7 needs the 
app to run in admin mode ... I know it goes against the whole idea 
of security but just in case I'm missing something....
BrianH
5-Jan-2011
[1743]
Not that I know of. Figuring out how to trigger the UAC prompt is 
on the list of things to do for the new installer though.
amacleod
5-Jan-2011
[1744]
Yes that would work.... (Promt)
Dockimbel
2-Mar-2011
[1745]
I'm lost with SDK builds for Linux. What is the difference between 
4.2 (Libc6) and 4.3 (Fedora)? Is 4.3 really Fedora-only specific?
Kaj
2-Mar-2011
[1746x3]
It's just the build platform, but it may determine on what other 
systems it does and doesn't work
4.2 Should be an older Ubuntu. In theory, that should produce good 
compatibility, but View is unreliable on Fedora and other newer systems, 
hence the Fedora build
I think my own graphical Syllable Server currently needs the Fedora 
build to have reliable graphics
Dockimbel
2-Mar-2011
[1749]
Do you think that it also has something to do with kernel version 
(2.4 vs 2.6)?
Kaj
2-Mar-2011
[1750]
2.4 Is ancient now; that shouldn't play a role anymore
Dockimbel
2-Mar-2011
[1751]
Ok, thanks. I think I'll stick with 4.2 for now.
Kaj
2-Mar-2011
[1752x2]
Usually, versions of the GLibC C library and X11 graphics are much 
more critical than the kernel
Be sure to test the graphics parts, then
Dockimbel
2-Mar-2011
[1754]
It's for Cheyenne, shouldn't matter.
Kaj
2-Mar-2011
[1755x2]
Oh, right, the popup is Windows only
The older Ubuntu build is indeed best for Core compatibility
GrahamC
2-Mar-2011
[1757x2]
It's a tray icon ... I don't think there is a popup now in windows 
.. at least I hope not.
that caused issues for cheyenne running under core
Andreas
2-Mar-2011
[1759]
The R3 downloads page recently got more precise about the differences 
between the various Linux versions:

4.2 - libc6 2.3
4.3 - libc6 2.5
4.4 - libc6 2.11
Dockimbel
3-Mar-2011
[1760x2]
Graham: no more View popups.
Andreas, thanks.
BenBran
5-May-2011
[1762]
Here is a code snippet 
works in the console, 
fails after compile:
version 2.7.6
--------------------------
REBOL [ ]

   errorMailHeader: make system/standard/email [subject: "test error"]
   errorText: "this is an error"
   emailAddress: "[ben-:-someplace-:-com]"
   emailAddress: to-email emailAddress

   send/header emailAddress errorText errorMailHeader
--------------------------
after compile says:
** Script Error: send has no value
** Near: send/header [ben-:-someplace-:-com]" errorText errorMailHeader

any thoughts???
Ladislav
5-May-2011
[1763x3]
The SEND function is defined in the %prot-send.r file, so I guess, 
that you did not include that file when building the program
(you should probably include the %prot.r file to have all the protocols 
you might need)
Did you read the SDK documentation how to do it?
BenBran
5-May-2011
[1766x2]
don't know where the SDK docs are.  I ususally just use the viewtop 
to do most everything
found prot-send.r
Ladislav
5-May-2011
[1768]
You get the docs with the SDK
BenBran
5-May-2011
[1769]
know the path?
Ladislav
5-May-2011
[1770]
I doubt it is so large you don't find it
BrianH
5-May-2011
[1771]
The SDK docs are online here too: http://www.rebol.com/docs/sdkug.html
Ladislav
5-May-2011
[1772x2]
Yes, that is an alternative way
http://www.rebol.com/docs/sdk/sdkintro.html

The standard REBOL SDK includes these files. 
 ...
BenBran
5-May-2011
[1774]
how funny - wasn't looking high enough in the tree.  I've been using 
that tree structure for so long that it became transparent over the 
past couple of years.
onetom
6-May-2011
[1775x2]
there is no rebol/command version for mac?
https://secure28.inmotionhosting.com/~rebolc5/cgi-bin/order.cgi?cmd=buy&prod=command
caelum
18-May-2011
[1777x2]
Can anyone help me with this. I am using Ubuntu. I would like to 
use SSL & TLS.


I thought Rebol could use SSL & TLS. I have SDK for Linux & Windows 
(with licenses). But when I try the following on rebcmdview or rebcmd:

>> port: open/direct tls://myhost.example.com:5555

followed by

>> set-modes port [secure: true]

I get the this:

>> port: open/direct tls://myhost.example.com:5555
>> set-modes port [secure: true]
** Script Error: Feature not available in this REBOL
** Where: halt-view
** Near: set-modes port [secure: true]

Any help would be appleciated?
I am using rebcmdview 2.7.6.4.2