World: r3wp

so you link to an exe file within the zip file? is it not necessary 
to unpack the zip file?

using any of the programs petr talked about, yes. with just a zip, 
you unzip then click on the link.

(i wish Windows had bundles, like OSX :)

Henrik - most of the free utils of archivers allow you to generate 
so called "autoextracting archive"

It HAS to be one click exe to run. No zip files. ah well, I give 
up :-) going back to work :-)

not sure if you can point it then to run some exe inside though ...

I wonder, anyway, how will you send it to your friends? ;-) Most 
of email servers will refuse it because of internal security policy 
- we don't allow to send .exes directly, not even inside .zip archives 
;-)

downloads from webpages...

try this:

http://motoko.rebol.it/test.exe

that's more like it :-)

will it work on read-only devices, such as CD-ROMs?

yep, extracts to temp dir. but this depends on the tool you use (i 
used winrar)

hmm ok

i mean default windows temp dir (like 99% of the installers do)

what's the latest encmd.exe ? Is that from July 2004 ?

If so, is there going to be a public update soon?  I presume that 
one is a beta release

That's the latest one I use officially. There was/is a 2.6 Core beta 
I think, more recent, but not View. A new official SDK is a highly 
requested item.

I use officially
 hmm... what secrets does that imply ? :)

Sorry, no secrets. Just that it's the one I use. I don't use the 
2.6. Core beta encapper for anything official.

Just reading the prerebol specifications.  You can conditionally 
include files for compilation, but can you declare parts of the source 
to be conditionally "compiled" into the exe ?

This one?

(Oops - There was request on "all" for this group)

Graham, conditional works. there is a #if .

volker, I can't see how #if allows me to remove chunks of code that 
I don't want incorporated into the exe

Because if allows you to insert code IIRC. Now if you insert a little 
code or a lot depending on the if?

As I understand it, #if allows me to conditionally evaluate some 
Rebol code, or to include source files into my code.

Yes, insert .. but not remove

Have to look up the doc..

http://www.rebol.com/docs/sdk/prebol.html

I guess I could include a "comment {" to comment out the whole section, 
but I'd prefer something else!

Hmm.  Are comments stripped out in the encapped binary?

Yes.

So, in that case I could include a conditional comment to remove 
large chunks of source code ...

In the case of #do the result of the expression will be placed in 
the output file. For example:
    version: #do [1.2.3 + 0.0.1]
will create the output:
    version: 1.2.4

? .. is that a non-sequitur

The #if and #either commands will put the results of their blocks 
into the output file. For example:
    version: #if [new-version] [2.3.4] [1.2.3]
will result in:
    version: 2.3.4

I see.

I'll give that a go :)

don't those commands evaluate the expressions .. I just want to include 
the source

Now if you put your code dafely in a lot of [] and evaluate that?

dafely->safely

Getting too complicated ..

Perhaps I need to ask for this feature in prerebol

try something like:

code: [executable code]
#if [condition] compose [(code)]

Graham, I don't understand your question.

#if [condition] [
    ; this part is included only if condition is true
    your code here
]
non conditional code here

Gabriele, I think I just misunderstood the documentation.

Couldn't SDK be redone in different way? I really don't want to miss 
rebcode for SDK. That is not good, given the frequency SDK gets updated 
;-) It lags behind usefull stuff for so long! It would be good, if 
the new release plan would count on SDK updates to come more often, 
or somehow magically Encap could use different kernels - you would 
pass it as a parameter:-)

dunno if technicall solvable, but basically such Encap would be kind 
of launcher, which would "boot" rebol - it would unpack it from executable 
into memory. But dunno if technically solvable :-)