World: r3wp
[SDK]
older newer | first last |
Pekr 4-Dec-2005 [262x2] | Ashley - as Graham said - use Base/Face ... include your mezzanines. Most of the time they will be compatible |
But ask yourself, how often do you need to remove some specific code from your app? How mcuh will you save? Rebol is not resources savy anyway, at least not in the runtime, for most embedded apps to work with ... | |
Ashley 4-Dec-2005 [264] | Most of the GUI work I do does not use VID or networking, so enface without any of the view-* or prot-* scripts is what I want. I do not want to use a loader front-end based on rebview that includes all this code. The cost in executable size may be small (less than 100Kb), but it's the start-up time and memory cost that I like to get as lean as possible. This will become more of an issue if and when REBOL is ported to small memory footprint devices. |
Gabriele 5-Dec-2005 [265] | Petr: one thing is official SDK releases, which need to be stable and secure (Rebcode is not secure yet); another thing is beta/alpha releases for developers brave enough to play with features like Rebcode. I guess the latter can be done as often as View betas. we should probably talk to Carl about this. |
Pekr 5-Dec-2005 [266x2] | OK, if that is doable, then yes, Gabriele. I just fear (judging according to my past experience), that SDK will lag. And it feels pretty arcane to "throw away" rebcode now in its current state ... just my feeling. |
I can understand security issues, if those are not solved yet, but .... | |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [268x2] | Its the sdk, so security maybe is not such an issue? Runs only your own code, not rebsites. But Gabrieles suggestion would be best: when releasing alphas, build /base /face etc too. |
would be at least more secure then switching to c instead. | |
Pekr 5-Dec-2005 [270] | Volker - that is not enough - you need Encap also .... |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [271] | Forgot to mention that ;) If Carl sets up such a build-tool, it should be able to build the encaps too. |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [272] | Well.. a new sdk has been finally released! And that includes Command. Thank you RT!!!! |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [273x2] | underway! |
How is it now about sourcecode? Its included, the link is public.. | |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [275] | Look at the license. |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [276] | That was in the last beta too and Gregg said no. And i am not sure about "with any REBOL Technologies products". Gregg said no, but IMHO if anyone can download, makes that sense? |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [277] | ; You are free to use, modify, and distribute this software with any ; REBOL Technologies products as long as the above header, copyright, ; and this comment remain intact. This software is provided "as is" ; and without warranties of any kind. In no event shall the owners or ; contributors be liable for any damages of any kind, even if advised ; of the possibility of such damage. See license for more information. license ?? can't find it. |
Pekr 5-Dec-2005 [278] | print system/license ;? |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [279x3] | In that case ...no additional restrictions on the rebol source code included with the sdk. |
If you have an up-to-date SDK license, you can download the new distribution from: www.rebol.net/builds/sdk If you do not have an SDK or command license, we encourage you to buy one and help support REBOL development. | |
But this suggests that you can only download it if you have an update sdk license. | |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [282x2] | Hmm, agreed. |
Would like more clear statements in the headers. With Greggs no i go with old-style-patching, and less than i would do otherwise. | |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [284] | Anyway, it's very good news to finally get a new sdk - and for command - before Xmas. |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [285] | That of course :) |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [286x2] | Ashley can now release a new version of RebGUI as well :) |
Arggg... still using the old beta icon :( | |
Pekr 5-Dec-2005 [288] | I just wonder, if Command got some fixes. Some openssl vulnerabities appeared in last few years, yet Command showed components of 2002 year. mySQL, from 4.x, requires new authentication method .... I don't trust SDK here ;-) |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [289] | ie. the rainbox icon for "R" |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [290] | IIRC ssh is rts own implementation, or do i get that wrong? |
Pekr 5-Dec-2005 [291] | I don't remember hearing clear statement here. Anyway - for Rebol 3.0, I give rebol the only chance - demodularisation! |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [292] | de?! |
Pekr 5-Dec-2005 [293x2] | I will try if fast-cgi is fixed for Windows, and if not, then that is the exact reason why I want components ... |
de - well, kind of czech-english here :-) demodularisation - decomposing into modules, or something like that | |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [295x2] | I would look for uniserv anyway, if i can run demons and need speed. |
demodularisation - how do you czechs speak? Me german would think de -> opposite of. (Of course its a bit nitpicking for fun ;) | |
Pekr 5-Dec-2005 [297x2] | :-) |
time to sleep, 0:41 here and I don't believe rebol has already fixed timezone problem, so actually who knows what is the correct time :-) | |
Henrik 5-Dec-2005 [299] | SDK 2.6.2 released |
Geomol 5-Dec-2005 [300] | It seems, some of the DRAW bugs are solved in the View coming with the new SDK, but rebcode is not included, afaik. |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [301] | and windows now stay infront as supposed to. |
Geomol 5-Dec-2005 [302] | The icons in Canvas looks strange with this new rebview.exe. I wonder why!? |
Henrik 5-Dec-2005 [303] | hmm... the rebview.exe is 33 kB bigger. that's quite a lot? |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [304] | Perhaps they left the debugging code in by mistake?? |
Henrik 5-Dec-2005 [305x2] | huh? Did View have Convolve functions for image processing? There is a very fast convolve demo in the desktop now |
under demos | |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [307] | Its new. noted in rambo. |
Henrik 5-Dec-2005 [308] | geomol, something new to add to Canvas :-) |
Graham 5-Dec-2005 [309] | And just for Pekr .. a button to disable auto-connect on start up! |
Henrik 5-Dec-2005 [310] | seems the rebol/services guestbook demo is broken now... shouldn't we move to a different group, btw? |
Volker 5-Dec-2005 [311] | WHy? isnt the sdk-christmas-tree here? :) |
older newer | first last |