r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[SDK]

Graham
5-Dec-2005
[312x2]
Guestbook works for me.
Of course, I had a guest book in my rebsite years ago :)
Henrik
5-Dec-2005
[314]
it seems to be a bug in the scroller. if you move it before the guestbook 
is loaded, it craps out
Graham
5-Dec-2005
[315x2]
Ahh... see it too now.
not asynchronous
Geomol
6-Dec-2005
[317x2]
I found out, why the icons in Canvas look different with the new 
rebview.exe coming with the new SDK. Before the SCALE command in 
DRAW didn't influence LINE-WIDTH, it does now.
I also see differences in the pixel-precision, when using DRAW. It 
seems, Cyphre's changes to DRAW are included in this release.
Gabriele
6-Dec-2005
[319]
yes, line-width scales now.
Pekr
6-Dec-2005
[320x6]
Henrik - IIRC Cyphre did convolve as an Rebcode test - but as rebcode 
is not inside, I expect currently convolve is in-built ...
it is imo way faster than even rebcode ... pity rebcode is not c 
level speed :-)
and as for strange colors, Geomol, I thought I have modified my monitor 
settings, but I do remember bubbles in demo were of slightly different 
colors
was there any tweaking to color schemes or such?
it seems more dark or so ..
hmm, the same, sorry, different quality LCDs here ...
Rebolek
6-Dec-2005
[326]
If you look at source, you can see that 'convolve effect has been 
really added. Nice. I can't wait for change-log for 1.3.2
Henrik
6-Dec-2005
[327]
pekr, I saw the rebcode test, and yes, the version in 1.3.2 is extremely 
fast compared to that one...
Pekr
6-Dec-2005
[328]
well, it is C against rebcode ...
Henrik
6-Dec-2005
[329]
makes you think a bit. :-) still, I did a gauss blur convolve in 
plain rebol code vs. rebcode and the rebol version would have taken 
a full minute to process the image, so rebcode is much better than 
nothing :-)
Cyphre
9-Dec-2005
[330x3]
Guys, please be patient ;) I'll post DRAW change summary in AGG group 
very soon.
BTW the new convolve function is written directly in C. Carl liked 
the rebcode convolution demo so he decided we should add this effect 
at native level.
From my quick tests the C version of convolve is about 15-25 times 
fater than the rebcode version. But this doesn't mean that rebcode 
is always 20time slower. It depends on the application imo.
Pekr
9-Dec-2005
[333x2]
yes, I noticed it, as I played with original rebcode versin a bit 
.... I thought for a little while - cool, they speed up rebcode, 
maybe kind of compiler inside? :-) and then I realised I am running 
official release, without rebcode inside :-)
I hope Carl liked also faster blitting, so hopefully this will be 
included one day too :-)
Cyphre
9-Dec-2005
[335]
I think the biggest bottleneck in Rebcode convolve version is extracting 
32-bit integer(pixel) into R G B A parts. We probably need some opcode 
for that. I think this could speed up the 'per-pixel' operations.
Pekr
9-Dec-2005
[336x2]
or we need plannar gfx like on amiga? :-) just kidding ...
hmm, such opcode would not be traditional asm opcode, otoh rebcode 
it rebol dialect, so - why not if found usefull, right?
Cyphre
9-Dec-2005
[338]
I think blitting is already in the todo list so stay tuned ;)
Pekr
9-Dec-2005
[339x2]
is blitting using just new/faster routines, or has in anything in 
common internally with how fast you can enter event loop (time wise), 
to call 'show?
hmm, probably wrong question ... it is not probably timer related, 
so must be faster redraw routines ...
Henrik
9-Dec-2005
[341x2]
Cyphre, I wouldn't mind having a few more opcodes that are really 
optimized for pixel writing as opposed to general purpose opcodes 
that are "sort of fast" :-)
(pixel reading too)
Cyphre
11-Dec-2005
[343]
Henrik, please put your rebcode pixel access opcodes ideas/enhancements 
into Rambo as a wish. This could make bigger attention to Carl ;)
Henrik
12-Dec-2005
[344]
hmm... I don't know much about it. I think I will discuss how it 
should be done first in the rebcode group.
Louis
12-Dec-2005
[345x2]
How can I check to see that a printer on a usb port is turned on?
I'm using Windows XP.
Cyphre
12-Dec-2005
[347]
You need to use Windows API calls for that imo.
Louis
12-Dec-2005
[348]
Thanks, Cyphre.  I was afraid that would be the case.
Terry
13-Dec-2005
[349]
Check that the little green light is on?
Louis
13-Dec-2005
[350]
I am writing software for people who know very little about computers. 
 :>)  Funny sometimes.
Volker
13-Dec-2005
[351]
if confirm "Do you see a little green light on the printer" [..] 
;)
Louis
13-Dec-2005
[352x2]
lol, you guys are right!  If the user can't even make sure the printer 
is on he or she is too dumb to use a computer.
Another question: what is required to use view-request.r with enface? 
I keep getting an error message:

** Script Error: sky has no value
** Where: context
** Near: color: sky size: 2x2
** Press enter to quit...


I just want a calander to pop up to request a date.  Is another source 
module required besides view-request.r?
Volker
13-Dec-2005
[354x2]
I would include at least %view.r, which then includes other files.
Seems there is some naming-convention. %view.r includes all 5view-*.r, 
%prot.r all %prot-*.r etc.
Louis
13-Dec-2005
[356x2]
Volker, that helps some.  But now I get:

Unknown word or style: request-date
I think I have included all the files needed. The problem must be 
in the way I am using request-date. Oh well, I figure it out after 
lunch.
[unknown: 9]
13-Dec-2005
[358]
I am writing software for people who know very little about computers. 
 :>)  Funny sometimes.
  
You mean 99% of the world?
sqlab
15-Dec-2005
[359]
Are there any documentation for calling the rebol.dll, which functions 
are exported  etc?

Has anyone tried to build a Win service with it or to use it with 
Apache?
BrianH
15-Dec-2005
[360]
sqlab, your answers (in order, and to the best of my knowledge):
- No.

- REBOL_Initialize, REBOL_Status, REBOL_WndProc. There isn't any 
current documentation as to the argument and return types of these 
functions. Some example code would be nice.

- Not to my knowledge, although the question of how to use this dll 
has been asked often. The Plugin group here was formed to request 
that the community create code that uses rebol.dll, and occasionally 
that request is repeated by the person that created the group, but 
progress stalled when people had difficulty calling the dll because 
of lack of documentation.
Volker
16-Dec-2005
[361]
IIRC James posted the headers.