r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[SDK]

sqlab
8-Mar-2006
[418]
Maybe you should add it to the list of programs allowed to contact 
te internet.
I
Louis
8-Mar-2006
[419]
Can it read a web page ?  I don't know, but it can't send email.
Geomol
15-Mar-2006
[420x7]
I see a strange bug with the REBOL/View included in the latest SDK 
of 5-Dec-2005. The following code produce a linear gradient in earlier 
versions of View (as it should), but it gives me a radial gradient 
in the SDK View:
FillType: make object! [
	grad-mode: 'linear
	startpos: 20x20
]

img: make image! 100x100
draw img	[pen none fill-pen FillType/grad-mode FillType/startpos
		0.0 100.0
		0.0 1.0 1.0
		0.0.0 255.255.255 0.0.0 255.255.255 0.0.0
		polygon 20x20 80x20 80x80 20x80]

view layout [image img]
Funny thing is, that if
FillType/startpos
is changed to
20x20
the gradient will become linear.
Conclusion so far is, that the DRAW command only can handle one object-reference!?
Help!
(This is crusial for me to continue Canvas RPaint development.)
*crucial*
To be more precise: is it a bug?
Gabriele
15-Mar-2006
[427]
if replacing the actual values works, i'd say it's a bug.
Gregg
17-Mar-2006
[428]
Is 'linear the default for gradients? i.e. are the objects being 
de-ref'd correctly at all? I haven't tried this in the new View, 
so I'm not sure how lookups are evaluated. Does it work if you use 
COMPOSE?
Geomol
17-Mar-2006
[429x3]
'radial is default (it seems). I indicate 'linear in the FillType 
object, and it does linear gradient, if that't the only value, I 
use by reference. If I have a second value by reference (FillType/startpos 
in stead of writing 20x20 directly), then gradient change to radial.
Notice! This behaviour, I describe, is ONLY with the REBOL/View included 
in the SDK of 5-Dec-2005!
I would like to use this precise View, because it has many DRAW bugs 
fixed, but make this new one.
Gregg
17-Mar-2006
[432]
Can you use COMPOSE? And does that work around it?
Geomol
17-Mar-2006
[433]
I have to test later, when on my windows PC. Thanks for the suggestion, 
Gregg. :-)
Geomol
18-Mar-2006
[434x2]
Gregg, yes, if I do a compose as in:

compose [pen none fill-pen (FillType/grad-mode) (FillType/startpos) 
...

then it work correctly. So that is a possible work around. It must 
be a bug, and I'll report it to RAMBO.
It's also worth noticing, that the bug is only there, is the 2 variables 
(grad-mode and startpos) are inside an object. If they're defined 
as stand-alone variables, it works too. So it's a problem with combinations 
of objects and DRAW.
Gregg
20-Mar-2006
[436]
I think that has to do with evaluation constraints then. That is, 
DRAW will get words, but not do further evaluation (kind of like 
CONSTRUCT), so it's safe.
Bo
23-Mar-2006
[437x3]
I'm trying to use the 2.6.2 version of enface from the SDK to encap 
a Rebol script I used to encap with rebolve, but I get the following 
error:
Set-Net not provided.
** Script Error: stylize has no value
** Near: stylize [
    wmtxt: text "Test" 255.255.0 font-size 16
    wtext: text " " 640 as-is no-wrap black white
    box: box...
** Press enter to quit...
Any ideas?  It also didn't support 'insert-event-func.
Graham
23-Mar-2006
[440]
you haven't included all the necessary files.
Bo
23-Mar-2006
[441x2]
Aha!
I guess I was expecting they were all included like with rebolve.
Graham
23-Mar-2006
[443]
you have to explicitly include all the necessary source files
Bo
23-Mar-2006
[444]
How does one ascertain which source files contain which functions?
Graham
23-Mar-2006
[445x4]
prot.r includes all the protocols
view.r includes all needed view stuff ( I think )
and there's another for mezz.r
you can edit these to rip out the stuff you don't need.
Bo
23-Mar-2006
[449x2]
Thanks Graham!  I have it up and running now, but it isn't working. 
:-(
I'll have to debug now to handle whatever changed in Rebol to cause 
it to stop working.
[unknown: 5]
24-Mar-2006
[451x3]
Just curious if the sdk package located at http://www.rebol.net/builds/sdk/
requires a newer license.key file?  I already own SDK but this one 
seems to tell me to put my license file in the correct directory 
when I try to run it and I have dropped into every directory I can 
think of.
If it requires a newer one then anyone know how much it cost them 
to simply upgrade their license file?
I am concerned that REBOL would require me to buy another one shortly 
afterwards.
Bo
24-Mar-2006
[454x2]
Paul, my license key still works.  I'd contact RT to see what's up.
You just need to put it in the directory where the executable is 
located (at least that's what I did).
[unknown: 5]
24-Mar-2006
[456]
Ok will do. How old is your license.key - when do you think you initially 
purchased SDK?
Bo
24-Mar-2006
[457]
Jan. 14, 2002.  But I used to work at RT so I may have a different 
license key than what you purchased.
[unknown: 5]
24-Mar-2006
[458x2]
Yeah that is true.  Thanks Bo.  I got an email into Cindy currently.
I guess this would be good to post in RAMBO for the future.
DideC
24-Mar-2006
[460]
My old lisense works with last SDK (license from end of 2004 IIRC)
JaimeVargas
24-Mar-2006
[461]
Same here.
[unknown: 5]
24-Mar-2006
[462]
It was a strange problem I think.  I think I had a pro key and an 
sdk key - that is my only explaination for the problem because Cindy 
sent me a copy of my original SDK download and that key worked on 
the newer one so I think I may have been using the wrong key file.
Louis
28-Mar-2006
[463]
The main problem I have with the SDK is that it makes it harder to 
find bugs. Does anyone have any idea what is causing this error message:

** Script Error: bind expected known-word argument of type: word
** Near: ctx-text: context bind ctx-text system/view
** Press enter to quit...
Graham
28-Mar-2006
[464]
you can optionally output your prerebol source and run that.  then 
no question of encap being involved.
Gabriele
29-Mar-2006
[465]
louis, my guess is that the encap version you are running is older 
than the version that code is expecting. (bind allowing objects is 
a rather new thing)
BrianH
10-Apr-2006
[466x2]
JeffM wrote in Core:

Can REBOL/SDK define functions that will be called from C and passed 
to a C function? For example:


c-logger: make routine! [ "Define the callback function for error 
tracking."

    logger: [string!] "using string! since a function ptr is just a pointer"
    return: [integer!]
] my-lib "C_Logger"

rebol-logger: func [s] [ print s ]

c-logger :rebol-logger
; Try this:

c-logger: make routine! [ "Define the callback function for error 
tracking."
    logger: [callback! [string!]] ; Here is the fix
    return: [integer!]
] my-lib "C_Logger"

rebol-logger: func [s] [ print s ]

c-logger :rebol-logger