r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[SDK]

Graham
1-Dec-2006
[909]
henrik, there's a separate download for the latest sdk .. which should 
be later than 1248031
Henrik
1-Dec-2006
[910]
I don't see it in that directory...
Graham
1-Dec-2006
[911x3]
No, it's not there.
But as I recall, you don't have the sdk anyway.
http://www.rebol.net/builds/sdk/
Henrik
1-Dec-2006
[914x2]
well, things changed a bit since last time. why do you think I post 
so much in this group all of a sudden? :-)
thanks for the link
Gabriele
2-Dec-2006
[916]
Henrik: usual place: http://www.colellachiara.com/soft/libs/autoupdate.r
Henrik
2-Dec-2006
[917x2]
gabriele, thanks. reading now.
am I right that autoupdate.r requires rebol/command?
Gabriele
2-Dec-2006
[919]
hmm, doesn't /pro have RSA too?
Henrik
2-Dec-2006
[920]
sorry, yes it does.
Graham
4-Dec-2006
[921]
Anyone know what the price of the sdk is if you already have the 
sdk on another platform?
sqlab
4-Dec-2006
[922]
I guess you can get the multi-copy discounted price of $299 each. 
That's what Cindy wrote me once
Graham
4-Dec-2006
[923]
errr.. the online price is $249!
sqlab
4-Dec-2006
[924]
Sorry, that was for the Command/SDK with a normal price of  $448 
according their web site
Graham
4-Dec-2006
[925x2]
I don't think command/sdk offers much on the linux platform as there's 
no odbc
Is there a Mac OSX sdk out yet?
Henrik
4-Dec-2006
[927]
there probably are builds for it, otherwise we wouldn't have AltME 
for OSX
Graham
4-Dec-2006
[928x2]
Good point .. but doesn't look like you can purchase it yet.
So, based on the above, maybe I can get the linux sdk for $49 if 
I already have command/sdk on windows?
Graham
5-Dec-2006
[930x2]
Getting a price out of RT is like ....
What sdk does Solaris x86 use ?
Graham
8-Dec-2006
[932x3]
http://www.rebol.net/builds/sdk/sdk-260204.. is that the right sdk 
for Fedora ?
http://www.rebol.net/builds/sdk/sdk-2602042.tar.gz
Ahh.. the execute flag has to be manually set on all the programs 
after unpacking it.
Graham
17-Dec-2006
[935x4]
After more hair pulling, I find that Debian will display truetype 
fonts in AGG draw, but when encapped it does not!
Rambo'd just now.
Looks like Rebol postscript preview in draw is down the tubes until 
RT fixes this glaring bug.
Anyone have any possible workrounds?
Cyphre
18-Dec-2006
[939]
I don't think the latest Linux SDK has the freetype support. AFAIK 
Carl compiled only some beta releases with  it.
Graham
18-Dec-2006
[940]
Can we get Carl to fix this??
Cyphre
18-Dec-2006
[941]
Try to write Carl on feedback. This could push him to do a new Linux 
SDK build.
Graham
18-Dec-2006
[942x3]
This was the latest build in downloads/sdk
Anyway I rambo'ed it
Does freetype support also imply type 1 font support?
Cyphre
18-Dec-2006
[945]
From the FreeType site:
#

By default, FreeType 2 supports the following font formats.

    * TrueType fonts (and collections)
    * Type 1 fonts
    * CID-keyed Type 1 fonts
    * CFF fonts
    * OpenType fonts (both TrueType and CFF variants)
    * SFNT-based bitmap fonts
    * X11 PCF fonts
    * Windows FNT fonts
    * BDF fonts (including anti-aliased ones)
    * PFR fonts
    * Type 42 fonts (limited support)
Graham
18-Dec-2006
[946]
so, View will be able to use them?
Cyphre
18-Dec-2006
[947x2]
So I guess all this should be possible to load using Rebol on Linux.
(but I haven' t tested all those font formats, just ttf)
Graham
18-Dec-2006
[949x2]
It would be good to test the standard PS type 1 fonts
they normally come with the ghostscript install
Cyphre
18-Dec-2006
[951]
I can test it if you point me to some free font to download.
Graham
18-Dec-2006
[952]
most Linux builds have ghostscript installed with the PD type 1 fonts
Cyphre
18-Dec-2006
[953x3]
let me check...
ah, found /gsfonts dir in my distro...will test some font from it 
in a minute...
yes, the PS type 1 fonts works ok for me here.
Graham
18-Dec-2006
[956x2]
That's neat.
What distro are you using?
Cyphre
18-Dec-2006
[958]
Mepis Linux. Well, Freetype2 is doing all the hard work for us here 
;)