World: r3wp
[SDK]
older newer | first last |
François 8-Jun-2005 [93] | PhilB, I asked the question a year and a half ago and the answer was positive. I bought SDK a month and a half ago and I hope they will keep their word... |
Graham 21-Jun-2005 [94] | Carl said in the weekend that parts of the SDK were being uploaded ... but I can't see them on rebol.net. Anyone know to where they were uploaded? |
BrianH 21-Jun-2005 [95] | An updated REBOL/Base for some platforms was uploaded to where they put the View alphas/betas. |
Graham 21-Jun-2005 [96] | but no SDK ... |
BrianH 21-Jun-2005 [97] | /Pro and /Command too. Base and Pro are part of the SDK. |
Graham 21-Jun-2005 [98] | I think /Base is for general distribution. |
BrianH 21-Jun-2005 [99] | I wish. Betas of it have been freely distributed, but there is not yet any place that you can download a release version of Pro, Base or Face seperate from the SDK. It was suggested to Carl that Base be ported to more platforms (particularly WinCE) and he seemed to think it was a good idea. |
Graham 21-Jun-2005 [100] | I'm pretty sure it was announced for general distribution ... although that may differ from implementation |
BrianH 21-Jun-2005 [101x2] | I'm sure we'll see when the SDK is released, and I hope that Base is released seperately, and for every platform that has Core since it is basically a subset of that. It would help immensely on WinCE, and there must be other platforms that have memory requirements almost as low, such as embedded Linux. |
I'd love to see REBOL on a single-floppy Linux. | |
[unknown: 5] 22-Jun-2005 [103] | Desperate for SDK builds |
Henrik 22-Jun-2005 [104] | rephrase that: "Won't buy SDK until it works with 1.3" :-) |
[unknown: 5] 22-Jun-2005 [105] | Well hopefull since were still in the "ones" - those that own SDK licenses will be able to run some new builds. |
Henrik 22-Jun-2005 [106] | I still don't own one and I'm not sure if upgrading will be free? |
[unknown: 5] 22-Jun-2005 [107x3] | I use it for my builds of apps for admin routines at work |
I doubt going to SDK will be free | |
It does give you much more capability such as the /library component | |
Henrik 22-Jun-2005 [110] | I know it costs money, but if I buy it now, will upgrades so that it works with 1.3 be free? I will be needing it for /Encap |
Graham 22-Jun-2005 [111] | Ask Cindy. |
Ammon 24-Jun-2005 [112] | The SDK license is a pretty kewl one last time I looked at it. You get the version that is currently available and free upgrades for 12 months... |
BrianH 24-Jun-2005 [113] | Agreed, although the free upgrades aren't quite as useful when they don't upgrade for more than 12 months. Hopefully the renewal fees aren't too bad. |
Graham 24-Jun-2005 [114] | Has there ever been a single official update? |
BrianH 24-Jun-2005 [115] | (Bad REBOL joke) You know, many companies only charge for upgrades that change the major version number. |
Graham 24-Jun-2005 [116] | So, no charge until we get to 2.x.x ? |
BrianH 24-Jun-2005 [117] | Hence the joke, and why it is bad :) |
Volker 24-Jun-2005 [118] | But these change major version-numbers more often? around once a year i guess? ;) although i would be quite happy to get 1.3 with my old sdk. |
[unknown: 5] 28-Jun-2005 [119] | Anyone know the timeline for a rollout of the SDK builds. Also, need to know if its going to cost anything. I am approaching a point in my programming where I could add some features from the /library components but probably wont if it is going to take time or be expensive. My project is not for money - freebie so any information is appreciated. |
Gregg 28-Jun-2005 [120] | Only RT knows. |
Graham 1-Jul-2005 [121] | Anyone seen this error before which has been reported to me * Script Error: External process failed: %1 is not a valid Win32 applic ation. ** Near: launch "webserver" view center-face loginlo ** Press enter to quit... where "webserver" is just the argument for the 'launch command. |
Cindy 14-Jul-2005 [122] | I can't tell you when the update SDKs will be released, only that the current SDK key will work with the new ones, no additional charge. |
ChristianE 14-Jul-2005 [123] | This is great news, Cindy. Thanks for assuring that. |
Brett 14-Jul-2005 [124] | Thanks! |
Henrik 15-Jul-2005 [125] | thanks |
Joe 23-Jul-2005 [126] | I recall that someone was working on accessing the windows video api using rebol library access. Anybody knows ? thxs |
Graham 23-Jul-2005 [127] | Cyphre |
Joe 23-Jul-2005 [128] | thanks |
Terry 26-Jul-2005 [129] | SDK SDK SDK SDK (everybody) SDK SDK SDK SDK.... (to the tune of Queen's "We Will Rock You") |
Robert 27-Jul-2005 [130] | Still waiting for the new 1.3 version too. |
Charles 5-Aug-2005 [131] | . |
Pekr 5-Aug-2005 [132] | :-) |
[unknown: 10] 8-Aug-2005 [133] | I wish..I wish..I wish..(clack clack clack)....like Alice in Wonderland... |
Geomol 9-Aug-2005 [134x2] | I have a problem, if I in a DOS-prompt under windows try to run a REBOL program built with REBOL/SDK into a .exe file, and the program is not in current directory, but has to be found along the PATH. I get the error Program error: invalid encapsulated data I've tried under Windows2000 and WinXP. Can others confirm this error? (Just make a simple REBOL-script with e.g. a print and try it.) |
The problem (bug) can also be verified with altme.exe. Just setup path in the DOS-prompt to where, altme is located, and type: altme | |
Gabriele 9-Aug-2005 [136] | I think REBOL needs a full path to itself. |
Geomol 10-Aug-2005 [137] | It works, if you place yourself in the same directory as the .exe file and don't give full path. It also works, if you place yourself anywhere and give full or relative path. As I see it, the error is only, if you're not in the same directory as the .exe file, and the system finds it along the PATH environment variable. Maybe I should report it in RAMBO!? |
Gabriele 10-Aug-2005 [138] | you can report it, but i'm not completely sure it can be fixed. |
Henrik 10-Aug-2005 [139x2] | From the builds page: "A Beta test version of the SDK with the 1.3.1 fixes and changes is now available for current SDK developers. Contact REBOL via feedback or email Cindy if you would like to try it." |
and it says its for win32 | |
Graham 11-Aug-2005 [141] | Geez, why not just post it !! |
Ladislav 11-Aug-2005 [142] | (because of the source it contains?) |
older newer | first last |