World: r3wp
[SDK]
older newer | first last |
Cyphre 18-Dec-2006 [958] | Mepis Linux. Well, Freetype2 is doing all the hard work for us here ;) |
Graham 18-Dec-2006 [959x2] | Are the Debian builds much newer than the other Linux builds? |
The Debian View has the freetype library, but the libc6 build does not. | |
Cyphre 18-Dec-2006 [961] | Yes, it looks so. AFAIK I'm using the Debian version here. |
Graham 18-Dec-2006 [962] | So, I should send feeback to Carl and ask him to put freetype2 support in all Linux builds and the sdk. |
Cyphre 18-Dec-2006 [963x2] | It looks only Debian,Ubuntu and OBSD beta versions should have this feature. |
Yes, I think that's the best way to let Carl know. | |
Graham 18-Dec-2006 [965x2] | Ok. |
there are separate downloads for Debian, Libc6, and Ubuntu .. yet the same Linux enface supports all of them? | |
Cyphre 18-Dec-2006 [967] | Sorry, don't know if some enface supports this. But I would say no. The FT2 support was only build in the separate beta releases. |
Graham 18-Dec-2006 [968x2] | I mean, the one enface for linux is able to build something that runs on Debian and Fedora. |
Yet, there are separate downloads for these for View. | |
Gabriele 18-Dec-2006 [970x2] | Graham, the needs for different builds on different distros only comes when you start requiring libs such as freetype, and find out that each distro is different. |
it may be possible that one of the builds will work on all distros provided some lib symlinking. | |
Henrik 19-Dec-2006 [972] | it seems encap does not like directories with spaces in the name |
Graham 19-Dec-2006 [973] | Carl just responded to my feedback asking which distros I want to use .. so that is a good sign? |
Henrik 19-Dec-2006 [974] | not necessarily... |
Graham 19-Dec-2006 [975] | implying that specific distros need specific support? |
Henrik 19-Dec-2006 [976x3] | probably specific series of distros. some distros use different ways of handling configuration, installation and some distros are changing the library versions constantly. |
anyone tried replacing the program icon in an encapped app? I just get a compression error when trying to open the app after the icon has been replaced. | |
I used reshacker as recommended in the docs. | |
Ashley 19-Dec-2006 [979] | Does this help: http://www.dobeash.com/RebGUI/cookbook.html#section-2 |
Henrik 19-Dec-2006 [980x2] | when trying to do it manually, I get the compression error. if I try it with scripting, I just get "invalid command" in the reshacker log. is it illegal to provide full path to the executable? |
hmm... should try a different icon. | |
Ashley 19-Dec-2006 [982] | Paths are fine, just need to be fully qualified local (not REBOL). Key is to ensure that after replacing icons they are in the same order and have the same dimensions and depths as before. You can use reshacker to do a before and after check. The example I use in the link above has everything in the same directory. Get that working first before worrying about paths. |
Henrik 19-Dec-2006 [983x4] | the icon I used had only one 16x16 icon. that's probably why it didn't work |
it works now for the manual one. now to get the scripting part to work. | |
found the error. thanks :-) | |
not so much luck with changing the file version though... | |
Ashley 20-Dec-2006 [987] | Key there is to keep it as a 4-part tuple. |
Henrik 20-Dec-2006 [988] | found out... seems to work now |
Gabriele 22-Dec-2006 [989] | basically the size of the .ico file (in bytes) *must* match exactly the built in one. which means that you need same color depth, size etc. |
Henrik 22-Dec-2006 [990] | you do have to fiddle quite a bit, but it works. I wish the SDK docs mentioned a bit more about this. it would reduce the amount of fiddling :-) |
Maxim 22-Dec-2006 [991] | I wish The encaps would use real resources for the code, so that we would not have to fiddle in the first place. and we would also be able to use PATH env variables to launch encapped scripts |
Henrik 22-Dec-2006 [992] | yes, if it worked internally, maybe it could be possible to produce windows builds on a linux/OSX machine? |
Pekr 31-Jan-2007 [993x3] | I need some advice. I try to encap very small and easy script. One of the first lines is list: read https://user:[pass-:-url-here] ... while it works from rebcmd in sdk/tools directory, it does not work when encapped in encmd, statin "invalid port specs". Why? |
I included mezz and prot functions ... | |
hmm, it works from encmdface.exe, but not from encmd.exe - that is strange, as there is no single View related function. Is encmd.exe missing https protocol? | |
Geomol 31-Jan-2007 [996] | Pekr, there was some problem with HTTPS in the SDK. I don't know, if it has been fixed in your version. http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?sort=1&limit=1&cmd=Search&id=&pattern=HTTPS |
Pekr 31-Jan-2007 [997] | 2.6.2 here ... encmdface saved me ... encmd does not know https? It should ... it simply states - invalid port spec .... |
Gabriele 31-Jan-2007 [998] | prot-http.r does not define https but only http. you need to net-install https too (just copy&paste the line that installs http in prot-http.r and replace protocol name and port id) |
Pekr 31-Jan-2007 [999] | hmm, but why it works with encmdface and not encmd? |
Gabriele 31-Jan-2007 [1000] | probably encmdface already has some stuff built in. (i.e. try without including protocols) |
Henrik 1-Mar-2007 [1001] | ** Script Error: Not enough memory ** Near: script: decapsulate I wonder why you get this particular error, if the program is already running and you are launching another instance of it. |
Maxim 1-Mar-2007 [1002] | probably, related to the local dir stuff... a major source of pain for me. |
Gabriele 1-Mar-2007 [1003] | 99% of the time that means "i cannot decompress the rebol code inside the .exe" |
Graham 1-Mar-2007 [1004] | caused by ? |
Gabriele 1-Mar-2007 [1005] | well, invalid data (eg. if you alter the exe), or not being able to extract the data, or anything else that makes decompress fail. |
Allen 1-Mar-2007 [1006] | I've seen this if the icons are changed but the replacements are not the same specs. |
Ashley 2-Mar-2007 [1007] | For those who missed it the first time: http://www.dobeash.com/RebGUI/cookbook.html#section-2.3 |
older newer | first last |