World: r3wp

Can some of you lurkers help me test out my spam filtering?
I just need you to send me an email to [gchiu-:-compkarori-:-com].

I want to see how many get non delivered, or misclassified as spam.
Just post here if you send me an email.

Thanks,

Sent...

ta.

Sent...

thanks.

sent

ta.

Mail returned ----- 554 <[gchiu-:-compkarori-:-com]>... Service unavailable

sent

Got Ammons, and my mailserver only delayed it for 30 mins.

(I actually sent two from different accounts...)

I got the gmail one.

Hmm.  554 .. I don't issue 554's.  I should have kept some logs to 
see why this was rejected.

Got DideC.. who used Rebol to send it.  We should really have a message-id 
generator as part of the send command.

Got tomc's email ...wonder how that got thru !

Haven't so far seen Ammon's alternate mail.  And Sunanda's suffered 
a write failure .. in my save-email routine :(

But no misclassification of spam so far.

Why shouldn't have TomC's made it through?

My alternate hasn't bounced yet so maybe it is still in queue somewhere...

I was bouncing spam

well, it wasn't even addressed to me ( in the to field ) ...

that part is easy graham

I tend to filter based on the header ... but I guess my filters so 
far didn't object to it :)

the addres stuff you see at the top of an email has about as much 
to do with delivery as the picture on a postcard

I must have allowed it thru as it was a RCPT TO:<[gchiu-:-compkarori-:-com]>

I noticed this morning it rejected a legitimate email from my own 
hotmail account as the address given by the EHLO gave a none reverse 
DNS ... but checking it again, it was okay.  So, some type of dns 
timeout error I guess

minor teething problems

Sent one.

Task-Master Service documentation and Modules API : http://www.softinnov.org/rebol/task-master.html

This doc is in draft state, so if you have any questions or need 
more info, please ask me here.

Looks pretty cool Doc, I'll check it out.

Thanks Paul. The remaining docs for services and protocols should 
follow in the next days, so I'll be able to release UniServe 1.0 
soon.

Is Uniserve integrating your NTLM auth scheme with the Proxy component?

Yes, in a service called "Proxy-NTLM", but not yet released.

great.  I that would be very useful.

I thought about making a standalone exe with Proxy-NTLM as replacement 
to this python product : http://www.geocities.com/rozmanov/ntlm/

This might be useful to a lot of non-techie users. (Just a single 
exe file with a minimal form for login/pass).

yeah definately useful.

Ever find any more information on Kerberos to use as a module?

Sorry Paul, didn't had any time to investiguate that more deeply. 
I'm late in almost all my projects (Uniserve and Cheyenne should 
have been out for 3 month now).

LOL - yeah I understand how that goes.

;-)

My last mail to Graham was Undeliverable. This could be because of 
the content I put in it :)

Reporting-MTA: dns; sv7.prth.eftel.com
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: E836A143ADA
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; <anton's email address>
Arrival-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:00:45 +0800 (WST)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; [gchiu-:-compkarori-:-com]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0

Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host pop.compkarori.com[203.79.110.37] 
said: 552
    write failure (in reply to end of DATA command)

Doc, just reading your task-master doc linked above. Grammar corrections:
provides you an integrate framework
  ->  "provides you with an integrated framework"

This service provides you :
  -> "This service provides :"

theses
 -> "these"
needs the following files been installed
 -> "needs the following files installed"
its spawns
 -> "it spawns"
job in background
 -> "job in the background"
transfer to it your data
 -> "transfers your data to it"
additionnal
 -> "additional"
service which dispatch
 -> "service which dispatches"
If there's no free processes
 -> "If there are no free processes"
it become available
 -> "it becomes available"
properties, event and method
 -> "properties, events and methods"
optionnally
 -> " optionally"
Maximum number of background process
 -> "Maximum number of background processes"
controled
 -> "controlled"
performances
 -> "performance"

I checked most of those first error strings above and they are unique 
in the document.

Thanks Anton, I'm fixing these errors at once.

Ok, done.