r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Rebol/Flash dialect] content related to Rebol/Flash dialect

amacleod
16-Nov-2007
[300x2]
Parts of R3 will be open giving the abilty to port
RT will have the main "kernal" closed and its this part that RT will 
develop other parts are left to the community to build
Steeve
16-Nov-2007
[302]
like QNX, same model
amacleod
16-Nov-2007
[303]
very similar
DanielSz
16-Nov-2007
[304]
Parts. That's the whole point. That means I won't be able to port 
it on other platforms, because I need the source of the whole thing. 
(I'll be happy to be proven wrong).
amacleod
16-Nov-2007
[305x2]
in fact Carl supposedly spoke with  the CEO of QNX shorly before 
they made that anousment
As far as I understand it R3 will allow you to port to any platform 
or OS. I'm sure there is an exlanation of how this is to be done.
DanielSz
16-Nov-2007
[307x2]
It's like on linux, compiling kernel modules vs. compiling the kernel 
itself.
To make a distribution, you need to be able to do both.
Steeve
16-Nov-2007
[309x2]
yeah , they steal his idea ;-)
I think that if your really motivated, RT let you port Rebol on alien 
platforms
DanielSz
16-Nov-2007
[311]
The main problem of Rebol is the business model. I've seen RT struggle 
with this since the first versions, I don't have a solution, I don't 
know how you make money with open source, but some people do.
Steeve
16-Nov-2007
[312x2]
with frameworks conception, you can
but we need an IDE for that purpose
amacleod
16-Nov-2007
[314]
I think RT realize they are not going to make money on hte software 
but on services revolving around the product
Steeve
16-Nov-2007
[315]
or not
DanielSz
16-Nov-2007
[316]
Either you can compile from source, or you can't. You don't have 
to merit it by showing how eager you are, or to mark points in other 
ways.
Steeve
16-Nov-2007
[317x2]
it's not the only point, i'm wondering why have no killer apps
Atlme is that one ? not sure
amacleod
16-Nov-2007
[319]
A brief description of R# components and how the "hybrid-open-source 
model" will work: http://www.rebol.com/docs3/architecture.html
DanielSz
16-Nov-2007
[320x2]
To me, the killer aspect of Rebol is the language design. It's just 
very, very expressive.
Altme? You must be kidding.
Steeve
16-Nov-2007
[322x3]
yeah, a little
but what else ?
i see nothing
DanielSz
16-Nov-2007
[325]
Another aspect I like about Rebol is the community.
Steeve
16-Nov-2007
[326]
yeah, we are cool guys
DanielSz
16-Nov-2007
[327x2]
The fact it's small and courageous. You side with the losers.
:)
Steeve
16-Nov-2007
[329]
by the way, it's not the good place for such comments
DanielSz
16-Nov-2007
[330]
In what sense?
amacleod
16-Nov-2007
[331]
Runtime Core - Closed: This is the OS independent kernel that provides 
standard REBOL capabilities across all systems and devices. It is 
this component that makes REBOL operate identically on Windows, OSX, 
Linux, BSD, Sony, Nokia, Nintendo, and other systems.
-from the above document.
Steeve
16-Nov-2007
[332]
in sense that we should move from Rebol/flash dialect thread
DanielSz
16-Nov-2007
[333]
to Vent?
amacleod
16-Nov-2007
[334]
Host Environment - Open: The environment defines an operating system 
abstraction layer (OSAL) that can be ported to a wide range of systems, 
including desktop systems, set-top boxes, mobile devices, and cell 
phones. This approach gives developers a way to run and improve REBOL 
on their specific target platforms.
-from same document
Will
17-Nov-2007
[335]
Oldes, would it be possible to have a version running with /core 
?
Oldes
17-Nov-2007
[336]
with some modifications yes... I'm not using it with Core
PeterWood
17-Nov-2007
[337]
Will: I'm guessing that you meant a version running with /core under 
OS X.
Will
17-Nov-2007
[338x2]
PeterWood: Right, as posted in OSX group /view doesn't work in 10.5/intel
Oldes: me I ask? 8)
PeterWood
17-Nov-2007
[340]
Will: When I tried to load the latest version of RWSF under Mac OS 
X it failed as it calls a Windows DLL.
Will
17-Nov-2007
[341]
Thanks for the info Peter! and read-thru is only in /view right?
PeterWood
18-Nov-2007
[342x2]
read-thru is certainly not in core 2.6.2.
The windows dll called by RWSF is Zlib
Oldes
18-Nov-2007
[344x4]
there should not be zlib anymore.. it was used for decompress anyway.
read-thru can be in core without problems
what I'm not sure is how struct! is supported in core
There should be also some change in image loader, but this could 
be done in core way anyway... this part of code is pretty old... 
2002 or something like that
Will
18-Nov-2007
[348]
COOOL !! Got swf8-convolution1.swf building on /core (OSX) ! How 
great this is 8) thanks Oldes!
ReViewer
18-Nov-2007
[349]
Keep on your project Oldes! That's a very good one. As Pekr mentioned, 
made with Rebol, run with Adobe. That means Rebol may not even need 
a plugin eventually. And for the ones who think alternative solutions 
are not for them, ask yourself what you're doing here! You're at 
the wrong place! Go to MacDo and Pizza Hut, install Vista and don't 
forget to buy an iPhone!