World: r3wp
[Windows/COM Support]
older newer | first last |
Anton 13-Dec-2005 [156] | Thanks for your offer, but Yeksoon has kindly set up a temporary website for us, and will set up a more permanent one after some server upgrading. |
Brett 14-Dec-2005 [157x4] | Just on those issues I mentioned maybe someone here knows: Issue 1 - CreateObject won't start Photoshop but does work with Microsoft products like Access, Excel, Word... >> obj_application: createObject "Photoshop.Application" -------------------------------------------------- ERROR: -------------------------------------------------- Member: Photoshop.Application Function: CreateObject Error In: CreateObjectEx Error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application. Code: 800700c1 Source: Application CODE: -2147024703 -------------------------------------------------- If I start PS by hand or use Call from REBOL then there is no problem. It is starting the process which is the issue. |
Issue 2 - Photoshop method PrintOut only works the first time, subsequent calls are silently ignored. I had a loop so my workaround was to Quit photoshop programmatically, then restart it with Call - bit of a sledgehammer but I generated my cards :) | |
Not a big issue for me now, but would be good to solve these for next time. | |
P.s both of these I tried at console and I think I did try a wait at the time. | |
Anton 14-Dec-2005 [161] | Yes, CreateObject assumes the application is already running. In the case of MS office apps, they are probably already running in the background somehow, or the interface supports those apps. |
Brett 14-Dec-2005 [162x2] | Ok thanks for that. Is there something I can use to start the application apart from REBOL's Call command? |
On issue 2, I've done some more testing this time with VB script and same result - just one print. However, trying a different printer - multiple prints work using VB script and REBOL/comlib. So it may be the printer driver that is causing me problems. | |
Anton 14-Dec-2005 [164] | I don't know, I haven't discovered this yet. I will of course put it into a demo when / if I do discover a way to start the app. |
Graham 12-Jan-2006 [165] | Any updates on the comlib ? |
Anton 12-Jan-2006 [166x2] | I forked and did a lot of cleaning and rebolifying, but I think Benjamin must be real busy or on holiday, because I've been waiting for his email for a while. Also, the more I worked on it, the more I wanted to check the basis of code. Maybe there is better library than disphelper to base on ? I don't know because I didn't check yet. Anyway, I will most l likely continue with my fork as is. |
Not going to do anything on that for a few days, I think. | |
Graham 12-Jan-2006 [168] | Was there a solution to Brett's problem ? |
Anton 12-Jan-2006 [169] | no news there. |
Gregg 12-Jan-2006 [170] | Not COM related, but I had similar problems with programmtic control of Acrobat. |
Thør 4-Apr-2006 [171] | . |
[unknown: 5] 4-Apr-2006 [172] | Yes Brett - CreateProcess |
Anton 27-Jun-2006 [173] | First release of COMLib-anton (Benjamin Maggi's COMLib, reengineered) http://home.wilddsl.net.au/anton/rebol/os/windows/COMLib/ |
Graham 27-Jun-2006 [174] | What changes ? |
Anton 28-Jun-2006 [175] | To see some changes, click on Browse Files, then docs/convert-ben-to-anton.txt |
Graham 28-Jun-2006 [176x2] | Anton, how stable is your fork? |
is it more stable than Benjamin's ? Although I can't say I've had any problems with his. | |
Anton 28-Jun-2006 [178x3] | I am confident in it. That is why I have published. I worked really hard for the last couple of weeks. I feel the new API is not likely to change very much from here. |
I have removed the use of callbacks, so there is no chance for indeterminate behaviour due to the asynchronous operation of callbacks. Exceptions are now thrown as rebol errors, so you can use standard rebol error checking. | |
I have scrutinized the API and cleaned it up, removing seemingly arbitrary divergences from DispHelper function names. | |
Graham 28-Jun-2006 [181] | Ok. I'll have to test it in the weekend. |
Anton 28-Jun-2006 [182] | Also, I am here to support it fully. |
Henrik 28-Jun-2006 [183] | COMlib requires a /Pro license, right? |
Anton 28-Jun-2006 [184] | Yes, to access external library. |
Henrik 28-Jun-2006 [185x2] | ok |
(maybe it would be worth mentioning to avoid too much excitement?) :-) | |
Pekr 28-Jun-2006 [187] | why? will not RT release library interface as any other normal language, for free? ;-) |
Henrik 28-Jun-2006 [188x2] | I was suspecting it could be working over TCP/IP like Geomol's OpenGL library |
but that would be a big security hole :-) | |
Anton 28-Jun-2006 [190] | I will be checking out RebCall at some time to see if it can be used. http://mortimer.devcave.net/projects/rebcall |
Henrik 28-Jun-2006 [191] | interesting one |
Pekr 28-Jun-2006 [192] | who is mortimer.systems? :-) |
DideC 28-Jun-2006 [193] | On his site, there is RebFcgi that can be interesting too. But only for Windows ! Any skilled Linux/C coder to addapt it for a Linux Apache Module ??? |
Pekr 28-Jun-2006 [194] | just ask DocKimbel to release his xy years old version. He did not do that, because RT asked him not to do so. IMO fastcgi is not feature which would ruin RT sales. Except secure mode there is very little value in the rest of Command - outdated ... |
Henrik 28-Jun-2006 [195x2] | for continous value in Command, you'd need something bigger. a different business strategy comes to mind. |
I think it's a little silly having to ask developers not to develop something even if it's fairly possible to do. | |
Pekr 28-Jun-2006 [197x3] | I think and I hope, that R3 design will be correct this time! No more integrated third party stuff, which does NOT belong to the kernel! The situation with fast-cgi was hilarious. It was never fixed under Windows, ot my knowledge ... |
I prefer plug-in system, so that if someone develops something interesting, I can buy it! RT or third party ... | |
Just dunno, if security (https) can be done that way, support for certificates etc., it is belongs to kernel ... | |
Anton 29-Jun-2006 [200] | I just found a nice way to simplify the usage, so the demos are going to get a little bit shorter. |
Anton 30-Jun-2006 [201x2] | I've added about ten newly converted demos to the site. Please send me any scripts you would like converted. I've done quite a few now so it will be easy. Then you can see the differences for yourself more easily, too. Graham, I'm thinking of your Skype script. |
Renamed this group from "COM Supporting" -> "Windows/COM Support" | |
Graham 30-Jun-2006 [203] | Did you want me to have a go at updating the SkyPe script ? |
Anton 30-Jun-2006 [204x2] | I just thought of it as one of the scripts that have already been created. Send me any scripts you wish converted. |
Now is a good time because it's fresh in my mind. | |
older newer | first last |