World: r3wp
[AJAX] Web Development Using AJAX
older | first |
Chris 16-May-2006 [159] | For all Yahoo!'s talk about web UI patterns and best practise, I still required User Agent Spoofing (through Camitools) to get it working... |
Alek_K 16-May-2006 [160] | http://thedailywtf.com/forums/70666/ShowPost.aspx:-) |
Will 25-May-2007 [161] | http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2007/05/21/file-upload-with-apollo-and-javascript/ |
Graham 27-Dec-2008 [162] | Exhibit seems a very interesting light weight JS framework. |
Robert 28-Jan-2009 [163] | Does anyone has a good overview about current Ajax frameworks and pros/cons about these? |
Oldes 28-Jan-2009 [164x2] | From what I tried (not much) I prefere jQuery |
And using this site you can compare, how much the frameworks use the global variables (the less is better I think) http://mankz.com/code/GlobalCheck.htm | |
Pekr 28-Jan-2009 [166] | Robert - Microsoft.cz guys visited me last month, and we talked about some 2 - 3 years future, about SharePoint portal. They told me one thing towards AJAX - MS is going to adopt jquery, without any changes. But of course, I would not consider it being set-in-stone. So maybe a jquery? |
Robert 28-Jan-2009 [167] | Ok, will take a look at it. |
Reichart 28-Jan-2009 [168] | Why would they adopt jQuery as opposed to push Silverlight? |
Maarten 28-Jan-2009 [169] | I think they'll use jQuery to instantiate Silverlight controls. |
Reichart 28-Jan-2009 [170] | Maybe. |
Maarten 28-Jan-2009 [171] | So as to push Silverlight, e.g. http://malsup.com/jquery/ag/ |
BrianH 29-Jan-2009 [172x2] | Not everyone can or will install Silverlight, and not every site can insist that their customers do so. MS developer tools division tries to support whatever their developers want to do on MS development platforms like ASP.NET. AJAX needs JS frameworks. |
So they adopted JQuery *and* push Silverlight where they can, even if that means supporting the Moonlight project like they did for the inauguration stream. I think that Silverlight has more potential than Flash, but I am not Flash's target market :) | |
Reichart 29-Jan-2009 [174] | Flash UI libraries are getting pretty good, check this http://www.splashup.com/ |
Oldes 29-Jan-2009 [175] | I don't think that Silverlight has more potential than Flash. From what I've seen, Flash is still much more better. And you have IDEs to make graphics for Flash which almost every designer is using now. I've dowloaded one MS tool to try to make Silverlight graphic app (to test if it would be possible to make a Silverlight version of the game we are making in Flash) and I must say, that I have a problems to use it. I cannot imagine how not programmers can use it. |
[unknown: 5] 29-Jan-2009 [176] | I'm with Oldes. I still think that Flash is far better than Silverlight. |
Reichart 29-Jan-2009 [177] | I don't know which is better, or which will win, but both systems are not the best or desired final design in my opionion. We need a completely open/free base that is a webased standard all devices can and do support by default. |
Maarten 30-Jan-2009 [178] | But early attempts strand so far. Anybody remmeber SMIL? More recently, SVG? Or..? |
Reichart 30-Jan-2009 [179x2] | SVG though I think of as ONLY 2D vector stuff. No? |
Why don't we just take PS, and simply move what NeXT did over to the web 15 years ago? Worked well there. | |
BrianH 30-Jan-2009 [181] | I think that Flash is *currently* better than Silverlight, but Silverlight has more *potential* because of the system model and such. It would be relatively easy to change the tools around Silverlight and add new capabilities to it, but it would be hard to change the entire semanitc model and system structure of Flash without breaking all Flash code in existence. That is what I mean about more potential. |
Henrik 30-Jan-2009 [182] | I was amazed at how well video runs in Silverlight on my Mac. But I'd still like to see a separation of video from Flash to get a simpler and truly optimized video player. |
BrianH 30-Jan-2009 [183x3] | I'd like to see HTML5 video, and not use Flash or Silverlight for video at all. |
The ability for either Flash or Silverlight to improve in an open/free way, in the areas where they are currently strong - multimedia and video - is very limited because of all of the patents on multimedia codecs. In other ways, Silverlight has more potentiial right now for open/free development because MS actually provides developer support to the Mono/Moonlight project. | |
Of course most people wouldn't let Flash or Silverlight run in their browser at all if it wasn't for video sites like YouTube. | |
Henrik 30-Jan-2009 [186] | with HTML5, would the browser itself provide the video player? |
Maarten 30-Jan-2009 [187x3] | iecanvas.... canvas.... build a UI in the new JS engines on that.... let anyone in the game. Dump the schizophrenic CSS + DIV + JS. http://ibolmo.com/projects/moocanvas/ |
Check the demos on that one. 3D cube is nice. And this works cross browser... | |
Now write a VID to that.... | |
Oldes 30-Jan-2009 [190x2] | With Silverlight is a problem,that maybe it may be used for simple GUIs, but not for animations. Here are SWF and XAML versions to compare http://theconverted.ca/demo.html |
But maybe the XAMLs above are so pure because Silvelight has big problems with compatibily between its versions. | |
Pekr 31-Jan-2009 [192] | what is iecanvas? plain html? |
Henrik 31-Jan-2009 [193:last] | great... another way to eat tons of CPU with "simple" demos. :-) |
older | first |