World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
BrianH 14-Jun-2006 [1110x2] | I don't think that Windows Automotive has solitaire, and I'm willing to bet that uITRON doesn't either. |
QNX isn't as much of a player in the Japanese automotive market, AFAIK. | |
Henrik 14-Jun-2006 [1112] | http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/<--- very interesting camera: take a picture, then choose the focus you want in the image. |
JaimeVargas 14-Jun-2006 [1113x2] | ubercool, I want one! |
Steve Dekorte (Io's creator on his visit to Ruby's User Group) I dropped by the San Francisco Ruby User Group meeting the other day. There were about 100 people there and all the presentations that I caught were basically non-technical overviews of dotcom sites that people were making with Ruby on Rails. Also, there were a ton of folks looking to employ Ruby programmers. In contrast, the last Python meeting I went to at Stanford was about 20 people and all the talks were fairly technical. Dynamic languages really seem to be taking off. Perhaps they just need to provide solutions (as Rails does for quick web programming) instead of merely technology for people to see the direct benefits and make the leap. Another interesting bit, I heard that Ruby's Mongrel webserver uses globally locked threads. I'm curious to know don't they use proper continuations and asynchronous sockets as Io does (with coroutines and async sockets)? | |
Graham 15-Jun-2006 [1115] | the most interesting thing I heard about Io at that meeting was that I could run it on my cell phone! |
yeksoon 15-Jun-2006 [1116] | Gates to work 'part-time' in MS by 2008. Ozzie step up to be Chief Software Architect. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060616/tc_nm/microsoft_dc_8 |
[unknown: 9] 15-Jun-2006 [1117] | Great, a guy that basically was "granted" Lotus Notes (he did not invent it for you young guys) is now in charge of MS....amazing...fitting.. |
Robert 16-Jun-2006 [1118] | You want the billion $ idea for digi-cams? Add a SLIM and BEAUTIFY button that will alter the taken pictures in real-time. |
[unknown: 9] 16-Jun-2006 [1119] | : ) |
james_nak 16-Jun-2006 [1120] | Sometimes known as a "lens cover" |
BrianW 16-Jun-2006 [1121] | digital beer goggles. I like it. |
Allen 16-Jun-2006 [1122] | Well he did manage to take groove from a good idea into a bloated behomoth. I think that's how he got MS attention ;-) |
[unknown: 9] 17-Jun-2006 [1123] | Yup... |
Henrik 18-Jun-2006 [1124] | http://irows.com/<--- way better done than google spreadsheets I think |
Henrik 19-Jun-2006 [1125] | http://www.wetpaint.com/<-- has Reichart debunked this one yet? :-) |
Terry 19-Jun-2006 [1126x2] | First off, I haven't used a spreadsheet in 10 years, and second.. wetpaint.com generates a boring web 1.0 page (here's the wetpaint anime page http://anime.wetpaint.com/ C'mon people.. think out of the box. |
Latest framewerks development uses ajax to send a change to the DB.. if that change requires authentication, the server <i>pushes</i> an authentication widget to the page (no refresh), the user fills it out, and carries on. very smooth. | |
[unknown: 9] 19-Jun-2006 [1128x2] | http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060619/ap_on_sc/norway_arctic_seed_vault |
A form of tech... | |
Graham 19-Jun-2006 [1130] | Perhaps they should be archiving old computer languages and source code? |
Pekr 20-Jun-2006 [1131x8] | Opera 9 released - http://www.opera.com |
Will give a try to their widgets .... | |
Tried widget touchTheSky - very nice ... transparent window, borderless ... kind of cool looking mini-apps View should excel at .... | |
instead of View desktop, we could look how do the organise their widgets in opera ... | |
.... and create plug-in version for all browsers supported :-) | |
trying goal 06 widget - it is rather slow ... imo VID could outperform it .... just who is gonna do nice graphics elements for us? :-( | |
71 KB of js, css, xml, html code to get weather plug-in .... imo could be done in fraction of size of rebol code ... | |
sorry, weather plug-in = weather widget ... | |
Chris 20-Jun-2006 [1139x3] | Are they compatible with Tiger widgets? |
I may be missing the trend here, but 'widgets' do look and feel a bit gimmicky. For one, they break the window metaphor -- I guess that is why Apple set them apart from the regular Tiger desktop. Are there any widgets that have transformed the online habits of anyone here? (non-rhetorical) | |
http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/ui/demo.mspx-- Preview of Office '07 UI. Interesting changes... | |
Terry 20-Jun-2006 [1142] | 'Thirst for knowledge' may be opium craving -- http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-06/uosc-fk062006.php I think I'm a junkie. |
Henrik 20-Jun-2006 [1143x2] | Widgets are good if they are done right. I like the dictionary widget for example in Tiger. If I'm watching a movie and someone says a word I don't know, I press F12, type the word, get an explanation, press F12 again without every pausing the movie or manipulating windows. |
The MacOSX Tiger implementation lacks a few things. It can be very slow since all widgets need to be prepared with webcontent before they can be used. There's no proper threading. | |
Izkata 20-Jun-2006 [1145] | New MS Word is missing the File, View, and Insert menus.... that'd take forever to get used to... |
Ashley 20-Jun-2006 [1146] | Are there any widgets that have transformed the online habits of anyone here? 1) Customizable real-time stock price monitor ... significantly faster and more versatile than traditional website equivalents. 2) Broadband usage monitor - aggregates several metrics into a simple display. Widgets that are well-designed focus on solving a specific [informational] need. The advantages they have over traditional websites with the same content are: a) Immediacy b) Conciseness c) Customizable |
Chris 21-Jun-2006 [1147x3] | Could those examples be better addressed with an appropriately designed Reblet? (I guess I make the reblet/widget distinction as 'reblet' = 1. behaving as a traditional application within the OS, in that it appears in the taskbar/dock and can be alt/cmd-tabbed to and 2. contained within an OS window, opaque though perhaps containing custom styling) |
Again, not a rhetorical question -- I see both as filling a similar space, I think Carl described it as 'disposable applications', easy to author, easy to use. Widgets look good, but break the windows metaphor, substituting gimmicky aesthetics for consistent user experience. I'm not sure there is value in the effort to emulate them over 1. making it easier to communicate with the services that drive them (better XML handlers, more flexible HTTP protocol, I18N, whatever), 2. making reblets more accessible (within the OS, not the browser), 3. providing an effortless base for making reblets look and feel good (still a chore, despite the capability of the view engine). | |
On point 3, I know that is a goal of RebGUI, but the project underlines that it is not trivial to set up a UI of OS/typical Ajax quality out of the box. | |
JaimeVargas 21-Jun-2006 [1150] | Ah. But the windows metaphor may get on your way, wasting pixels, could you imagine an airplane control with windows interface? I think widget are good as Ashley pointed out. The approach apple took seem appropiate too. |
Pekr 21-Jun-2006 [1151x4] | I think that Viewtop was not bad idea - but when you look at public section, you see rather static/dead/non-live section .... it is like with rebol site Reichart was working on .... it needs to show evidence of life ... |
it is not in widgets itself, but in categorisation per author, per theme, newest, most popular, etc etc. We have kind of categorisation experience with our librarian team ... | |
Chris - rebgui looks old, dull to me. Look at ad-aware look for e.g. There are two things - typical application, as db-stuff, etc., you want them to be system friendly. But I don't want my cool widget/reblet to look like W9X app ... | |
my long time experience - since the times of amiga, is, that if it catches your eye, you have already won typical user's attention. Sadly, but the rest is often "a technical detail". We miss some gfx guys here, as Chris is surely pressed for the time. View engine is created for non-typical designs, yet we were not successfull in utilising it ... | |
Chris 21-Jun-2006 [1155] | That's what I'm addressing -- it takes over much effort to make a good looking reblet UI, compared with say, making a Ajax-based app with HTML + CSS (not to say it's easier to provide app logic). |
Pekr 21-Jun-2006 [1156x3] | you are kidding, no? how can be Ajax and css easier to produce? in CSS you have to do it nearly manually (you said so to me some time ago :-) |
hmm, maybe I missunderstand .... what might be easier is to provide final look, as css is independent to gui elements ... | |
but it should not be the problem to do the same using rebol ... you remember Gateway's RT catalogue? Looked very nice for such kind of app ... | |
Chris 21-Jun-2006 [1159] | Creating CSS manually is not necessarily a barrier. I love the control it provides. |
older newer | first last |