World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
Jerry 26-Oct-2006 [1310] | Adobe Apollo http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo |
[unknown: 9] 27-Oct-2006 [1311] | Java was not open source? I did not know that. |
BrianW 27-Oct-2006 [1312] | They had their own funky license. Don't know what it is, because I never really pay attention to Java. But they've been bragging about some sort of "developer community" for about ... 1 year? |
BrianH 27-Oct-2006 [1313] | They've been bragging for much longer than that, but their license was more like shared source, but more restrictive. |
Anton 28-Oct-2006 [1314] | Yes, I think it was that any improvements you made to the core were owned by Sun. Something like that. |
Terry 28-Oct-2006 [1315] | Some things are clearer with hindsight of several years. It is necessary to evolve HTML incrementally. The attempt to get the world to switch to XML, including quotes around attribute values and slashes in empty tags and namespaces all at once didn’t work. The large HTML-generating public did not move, largely because the browsers didn’t complain. Some large communities did shift and are enjoying the fruits of well-formed systems, but not all. It is important to maintain HTML incrementally, as well as continuing a transition to well-formed world, and developing more power in that world. The plan is to charter a completely new HTML group. Unlike the previous one, this one will be chartered to do incremental improvements to HTML, as also in parallel xHTML. It will have a different chair and staff contact. It will work on HTML and xHTML together. We have strong support for this group, from many people we have talked to, including browser makers. Tim Berners - Lee |
Volker 29-Oct-2006 [1316] | This is basically LSL and PHP code that can be used to communicate between an object in SecondLife and your web server. http://rpgstats.com/wiki/index.php?title=ExampleRPC2PHP |
Terry 30-Oct-2006 [1317] | that is so verbose |
Pekr 30-Oct-2006 [1318x2] | what's new in FF 2.0, standards/technology wise - http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Firefox_2_for_developers |
I just briefly looked into JavaScript 1.7 and client side sessions ... | |
yeksoon 1-Nov-2006 [1320] | Google acquired JotSpot http://www.jot.com/ hmm.. with Calendar, Spreadsheet, etc...they may turn it into a Project Management thing. |
Pekr 1-Nov-2006 [1321x2] | The flawed word of web standards? http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061029-8101.html |
maybe Reichart should think about QTask interface for R3 :-) | |
Allen 2-Nov-2006 [1323] | As W3C have discovered, a "standard" is what the majority of people are using, not necessarily what a committee says it is. :-) |
yeksoon 3-Nov-2006 [1324] | my standard and your standard. |
Maxim 3-Nov-2006 [1325] | I always like the term "A NEW STANDARD" :-) |
Anton 5-Nov-2006 [1326] | http://home.comcast.net/~justin_brady/walkietalkie/ |
[unknown: 9] 5-Nov-2006 [1327x2] | Cute, has anyone made a peerless thing like Skype? It would assume that each client would need to relay to at least one additional client. |
We use TeamSpeak still, it works about 85% of the time, and with about 85% of people. For example Europe gets messed up sometimes. | |
Anton 5-Nov-2006 [1329] | I'm still interested in non-proprietary stuff. I'd like to try out walkietalkie sometime. Linux source is available. Could probably make something like that in rebol, with a support DLL. But not today.... |
Ladislav 8-Nov-2006 [1330x2] | See the newest development in hash functions: http://cryptography.hyperlink.cz/SNMAC/SNMAC_EN.pdf |
(the first hash proposal offering a safety proof) | |
Pekr 9-Nov-2006 [1332] | What we were supposed to get back in 2003? http://youtube.com/watch?v=b9ifQvQCO7Y - what a multiimedia capabilities :-) |
Pekr 12-Nov-2006 [1333x2] | Is sun going to be the technology leader instead of IBM? - http://www.sun.com/emrkt/blackbox/index.jsp |
I welcome what both companies do with supporting their open designs .... after all those years Sun is even opening JAVA .... | |
CharlesS 12-Nov-2006 [1335] | wow, thats a big step |
yeksoon 12-Nov-2006 [1336] | Is sun going to be the technology leader instead of IBM? - what does IBM meant to you nowadays? To me, they are just a Professional Services Organization.. , granted, they have R&D etc. But, they have been slowly getting rid of various assets over the years. |
Louis 13-Nov-2006 [1337] | 'The "Penelope" project's intention is to join the Eudora® user experience with the Mozilla platform. We intend to produce a version of Eudora that is open source and based on mozilla and Thunderbird. It's *not* our intention to compete with Thunderbird; rather, we want to complement it.' http://wiki.mozilla.org/Penelope#Current_Status |
Pekr 13-Nov-2006 [1338x4] | Yeksoon - are you kidding, right? Dunno precise SUN portfolio, but except their CPU/Server technology plus corresponding sw, JAVA, what are they doing technology wise? |
IBM, in that regard, even if they sold their PC business, has much more broader aproach ... | |
... not to mention their sw division ... | |
FireBird 2.0 goes gold - http://www.firebirdsql.org/ | |
Graham 13-Nov-2006 [1342x2] | Wish RT would support Firebird natively ... :) |
Can't use it on Linux ..., and I see it now has support for incremental online backup too. | |
Pekr 13-Nov-2006 [1344] | good experience with FB? Do you use ODBC driver? |
Graham 13-Nov-2006 [1345] | Yes ... so stuck on windows |
Pekr 13-Nov-2006 [1346] | why no Linux? I also read it can be used in non-server = local file version? |
Graham 13-Nov-2006 [1347] | Firebird is on Linux, Solaris etc. But how to connect? No Rebol driver. |
Pekr 13-Nov-2006 [1348] | there isn't odbc driver for linux? |
Graham 13-Nov-2006 [1349x2] | Not that I know of .. but odbc is not supported on Linux anyway. |
http://www.reboltalk.com/forum/index.php/topic,304.0.html See Carl's answer. | |
Pekr 13-Nov-2006 [1351] | eh, did not know it ... I thought that Command SDK does support it cross platformly ... |
Graham 13-Nov-2006 [1352] | Not that I know of. |
Pekr 13-Nov-2006 [1353] | is there description of FB protocol anywhere? I mean - to do eventually tcp driver? |
Graham 13-Nov-2006 [1354] | FB is natively tcp .. but there is no description that I know of. |
Pekr 13-Nov-2006 [1355] | uhm, that is a pity - how then other langs do their support? |
Graham 13-Nov-2006 [1356] | I guess they must have read the firebird C sources and figured it out. |
Pekr 13-Nov-2006 [1357] | why have you decided to use FB for your EMR system? Wouldn't you be better serverd by mySQL e.g.? |
Graham 13-Nov-2006 [1358x2] | Good question! |
Licensing for one. | |
older newer | first last |