World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
Anton 10-Jan-2007 [1561] | Roads should be built of rare earth magnets. |
[unknown: 9] 10-Jan-2007 [1562x3] | It does not work that way. You would have to have a giant coil in the ground, and the car would be the object (creating a magnetic field). In fact this is the way street lights know when to change. There is a coild of copper in the ground. You might notice octagonal cuts in the ground even in Australia where they place these. |
If the road was made of magnets, then when you dropped your pen knife, you could not pick it back up. The ground would quickly be covered in paperclips and screws. | |
(sorry, I just realized you were writing tongue in cheek). I'm working on a technical paper, and was in "literal mode") | |
Anton 10-Jan-2007 [1565x2] | Sensors could sense the car's magnetic field, then switch on the opposite polarity in the ground magnet, so magnets are only powered when there is a car nearby. |
(only half tongue in cheek.) | |
[unknown: 9] 10-Jan-2007 [1567x3] | That is possible, but so expensive it would be better to have minimin wage works carry you to work and to the market. |
They can fan you too. | |
If you are hot... | |
Anton 10-Jan-2007 [1570x2] | That's so last millenium, though. |
You've got to have floating magnets involved somehow ! | |
[unknown: 9] 10-Jan-2007 [1572x2] | True, but cheapper than magnets...and more fun really. |
The Germans are working on it....I hear it is getting cheaper, but still not cost effective even for a monorail. | |
Anton 10-Jan-2007 [1574] | I wonder about those stories sometimes. |
[unknown: 9] 10-Jan-2007 [1575] | Also, you still have to have a giant power source, and it would not be availble everywhere, so you still need to bring power with you. |
Anton 10-Jan-2007 [1576x2] | Microwave dishes on the top of skyscrapers beam power down to where it's needed on the roads below. |
So that works for the city.... | |
[unknown: 9] 10-Jan-2007 [1578] | Actually that does not work, for a lot (insert misc. dead humans and animals in line of site here) reasons. |
Anton 10-Jan-2007 [1579x2] | Maybe a beam which converges to a focal point under the ground, passing weakly through objects above. |
Never mind the power - surely rare earth magnets can be kept in opposite polarity ? In the ground, in the car. So the car floats above the ground. A fan powered by push-bike pedals moves the car through the air like a hovercraft. | |
Gabriele 11-Jan-2007 [1581] | nah, let's just use antigravity. :P http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/03/060325232140.htm |
Anton 11-Jan-2007 [1582] | Aha! Looks very interesting :) |
Geomol 11-Jan-2007 [1583] | I'm in two minds regarding gravity. All my logic and understanding tells me, that Einstein was right, when he said, that gravity is curvation of space-time. Then gravity is not a field like electro-magnetism (light) and the other natural forces (strong and weak kernel forces), and there's not a particle (which are actually waves) called a graviton, like we have fotons, gluons, Z0 and W+-, whose are responsible for transfering the forces. But I really really hope, I'm wrong, so that antigravity can be reality one day. The spacecraft Gravity Probe B was finished collecting data almost two years ago, and results should have been published last year, but they wasn't! There's something wrong with the data. They might come to some very interesting results: http://einstein.stanford.edu/ CERN are upgrading their accelerator, and they should start some new experiments this year, where they hope to find the Higgs boson and maybe the graviton. I'll be very surprised, if they find the graviton. I don't know enough about the Higgs boson to have an opinion on that. But it's exciting times! :-) |
Pekr 11-Jan-2007 [1584x2] | give me this one - http://www.dynamism.com/oqo02/main.shtml |
those things start to look good ... but imo pricey yet ... | |
Henrik 12-Jan-2007 [1586] | http://www.6502asm.com/<--- 6502 compiler and emulator in javascript. |
Jerry 12-Jan-2007 [1587] | The OS that Apple iPhone uses is MacOS X. Does that mean our REBOL programs can run on iPhone? |
BrianW 12-Jan-2007 [1588x2] | I'm a little fuzzy on that too, Jerry. They say it's OS X, which should mean that we can hack at it all we want, or at least transfer applications/scripts to it. But I'm hearing that Apple is opposed to 3rd party development for the iPhone. I wonder if they plan on locking it down somehow. |
But I see that idea was touched on in OSX group while I was gone. | |
Sunanda 12-Jan-2007 [1590] | The iPhone is locked down, and not even open source. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/12/apple_lockdown_iphone/ |
Jerry 13-Jan-2007 [1591] | Finally, D 1.0 is released. http://www.digimars.com/d/index.html |
Henrik 13-Jan-2007 [1592] | http://www.anandtech.com/displays/showdoc.aspx?i=2904&p=3<--- amazing OLED displays |
Graham 14-Jan-2007 [1593] | Open Firmware was made free under the BSD/MIT license in Nov 2006. http://lwn.net/Articles/209301/ Would that help a Rebol OS ? |
Pekr 17-Jan-2007 [1594x2] | HP claims nano-chip breakthrough - http://tech.monstersandcritics.com/news/article_1247407.php/Hewlett_Packard_claims_nano-chip_breakthrough |
OpenMoko - an alternative to iPhone with free-to-extend OS? - http://www.libervis.com/article/forget_iphone_hail_openmoko_the_true_revolution | |
[unknown: 9] 17-Jan-2007 [1596] | He characterized HP's results as 'amazing' and said it had the potential to extend indefinitely the reach of Moore's Law which posits that the power of microchips will double every 18 months. uh...............no.... |
Tomc 17-Jan-2007 [1597] | just the number of transisters ... |
Oldes 23-Jan-2007 [1598] | Yahoo Messenger for Vista! - http://messenger.yahoo.com/windowsvista.php |
Brock 23-Jan-2007 [1599] | looks like they used Cyphre or Gabriele's background generator ;-) |
Henrik 23-Jan-2007 [1600] | is that a good or a bad thing? |
Rebolek 23-Jan-2007 [1601] | I want B/W GUI so more CPU cycles can be used for something useful :) |
Oldes 23-Jan-2007 [1602] | Henrik: I think, it was a joke |
Henrik 23-Jan-2007 [1603] | oldes, I know. :-) |
[unknown: 9] 24-Jan-2007 [1604] | http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/18086/ |
Tomc 24-Jan-2007 [1605] | if true that would make my day |
Maxim 25-Jan-2007 [1606x4] | hum... someone in the comments explains and rebuffs the patent and describes that the idea actually cannot really deliver more than 1% of the theoretical numbers claimed by the patent... which would bring it at about the same levels as current top of the line batteries. |
so the 10x power for .5 the price... well actually makes it double the price if the 1% is exact | |
another person also explains how the batterie's reaction to thermal changes might be rather high (50% power fluctuation between cold and hot temps) | |
but all agree to being glad if proven wrong. | |
Oldes 28-Jan-2007 [1610] | US answer to global warming: smoke and giant space mirrors http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,1999968,00.html |
older newer | first last |