r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Tech News] Interesting technology

Henrik
19-Sep-2007
[2629]
jerry, just from the screenshots, it does not look particularly impressive.
Jerry
19-Sep-2007
[2630]
Henrik, you're right. And not just that, the performance is not good, 
because of Java. The download size is 150MB, and the installation 
size is 300+ MB. Why does IBM make everything dull and huge? We should 
make an Rebol Office, I mean it. After REBOL/View system has been 
improved in R3, this is not impossible.
PatrickP61
19-Sep-2007
[2631]
This seems interesting...  Lina Software released the source code 
for LINA under the GPL v2. LINA enables Linux binaries to run with 
native look and feel on Windows, Mac, and Linux, without recompiling. 
 http://openlina.org/news.html
Pekr
22-Sep-2007
[2632]
Interesting comparison of Open Office Writer and Microsoft Word 2007 
- http://www.linux.com/feature/118986


I thought Writer couldn't be compared to Word, but now I try to download 
Open Office to judge myself ....
Henrik
22-Sep-2007
[2633]
http://unicap-imaging.org/unicap_eeepc.htm<--- this looks like a 
nice and interesting machine.
PatrickP61
24-Sep-2007
[2634]
For those of you who want StarOffice 8 but dont want to pay the $70 
-- Its now in Google Pack  www.itwire.com/content/view/13981/53/
Henrik
24-Sep-2007
[2635]
http://blog.palm.com/palm/2007/09/a-message-to-pa.html<-- seems 
the Palm Foleo has been cancelled.
Graham
24-Sep-2007
[2636]
turning cars into network nodes http://www.vehicularlab.org/
[unknown: 10]
27-Sep-2007
[2637]
after windowsajax here is X-desktop -> http://www.x-desktop.org/
Terry
28-Sep-2007
[2638]
WebRunner -

WebRunner is a simple XULRunner based browser that hosts web applications 
without the normal web browser user interface. WebRunner is based 
on a concept called Site Specific Browsers (SSB). An SSB is an application 
with an embedded browser designed to work exclusively with a single 
web application.
http://wiki.mozilla.org/WebRunner
Pekr
5-Oct-2007
[2639x2]
OLPC - http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/04/technology/circuits/04pogue.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Nice article. REBOL would fit in, teaching children VID :-)
Gabriele
5-Oct-2007
[2641]
it's not open source
Louis
6-Oct-2007
[2642]
Free computer books:

http://www.onlinecomputerbooks.com/free-xml-books.php
btiffin
9-Oct-2007
[2643]
Concentrate...use the force.  http://technology.canoe.ca/Innovations/2007/04/30/4142020-ap.html
 Light sabre stays lit if you focus your mind.
Sunanda
10-Oct-2007
[2644]
A bare metal Linux box that boots up key apps [email, browser] in 
seconds:
http://www.splashtop.com/index.php
Just what the average home user needs :-)
Henrik
10-Oct-2007
[2645]
finally
Pekr
18-Oct-2007
[2646]
new site of Qtask - http://www.qtask.com/index.php- congratulation!
Terry
18-Oct-2007
[2647x2]
And it only costs user.r members $75 / month.
... each
Maarten
18-Oct-2007
[2649]
Thta's a bargain at the current euro-$ exchange rate ;-)
Pekr
18-Oct-2007
[2650]
:-)
amacleod
18-Oct-2007
[2651]
Pekr, Where is rebol in this product? Is it in form of CGI, RSP ?
Pekr
18-Oct-2007
[2652x2]
whole backend is said being coded in rebol ...
http://www.qtask.com/industry/faq.php
amacleod
18-Oct-2007
[2654]
So the interface is all html and java script (traditional tools, 
AJAX too) and rebol is used on the server.
james_nak
18-Oct-2007
[2655]
That's an impressive list of  services as well.
btiffin
18-Oct-2007
[2656]
Terry;  I'm not sure of future plans, but no.  user.r was gifted 
the space and invites to members will remain at zero cost (until 
I'm told otherwise - again I'm not in on their business planning. 
The offer from Qtask was a gift).  So it's more like membership with 
user.r on Qtask is like getting a $75 a month bonus.   As a matter 
of fact, I want to move the current user.r Chat PITL project to Qtask 
sometime this weekend.  You can't beat Qtask for project management. 
  And being the friendly fence sitter...you can't really beat kommonwealth 
for the 'fun social side' that user.r should also portrait.  Both 
sites are suffering neglect right now, but that will change.
amacleod
18-Oct-2007
[2657x2]
hyuyuguy fffffffffffffffffffffffffffddddddddddseQ\\\\\\
\
Tomc
19-Oct-2007
[2659]
I know exactly what you mean
amacleod
19-Oct-2007
[2660]
kids again...
Rebolek
22-Oct-2007
[2661x2]
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071021-core-of-windows-7-taking-shape-meet-the-minwin-kernel.html
windows with (relatively) small footprint? wtf?
Pekr
22-Oct-2007
[2663]
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/sun-scrapping-mobile-java-moving-devices-to-standard-java-313589.php
Robert
23-Oct-2007
[2664]
I still made it to keep my hands away from Java and I will hope I 
can continue to do so...
Pekr
23-Oct-2007
[2665]
MS steps into functional programming area - introducing F# - http://www.betanews.com/article/Experimental_Functional_Language_Emerges_from_Microsoft_Research/1193170328
Henrik
24-Oct-2007
[2666]
Finally IMAP in GMail
Graham
24-Oct-2007
[2667]
where?
Sunanda
24-Oct-2007
[2668]
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?ctx=gmail&hl=en&answer=75725
Graham
24-Oct-2007
[2669x2]
secure imap
needs Rebol/Command
Henrik
24-Oct-2007
[2671]
looks like I'm not using SSL in mail.app. sure you need secure imap?
Ingo
24-Oct-2007
[2672]
You need to activate IMAP before use, in Setting, "Forwarding adn 
POP/IMAP". At the moment it seems not to be available for all accounts, 
not for mine for example ;-(
Sunanda
24-Oct-2007
[2673]
I don't have it either.
Looks like they are rolling it out slowly.
Henrik
24-Oct-2007
[2674]
one needs to select US English as language. that helped for me.
Ingo
24-Oct-2007
[2675]
Well, I have switched away and back to US English with no change 
...
Graham
24-Oct-2007
[2676]
the instructions I looked at say to use the ssl imap ports
Terry
24-Oct-2007
[2677]
 Take a peek under your Settings in Gmail, and click into your 'Forwarding 
 and POP IMAP' tab to see if you are one of the lucky ones who got 
 IMAP first.
Tomc
24-Oct-2007
[2678]
nope