r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Tech News] Interesting technology

btiffin
13-Feb-2008
[2810]
FSF calls for boycott of Trend Micro;  http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/boycottTrendMicro.html
 over a lawsuit involving a competitors use of ClamAV in an infringing 
way.   Umm, scanning for viruses before they get into local networks 
is a patented process it seems.
[unknown: 5]
14-Feb-2008
[2811]
I don't see the problem with TrendMicro in that situation.  Seems 
they have every legal right to do what they are doing.
Mchean
14-Feb-2008
[2812]
Zimbra: http://www.zimbra.com/Again, someone eating IOS's cake.
Henrik
14-Feb-2008
[2813]
Looks like someone is pouring money in SCO.
Henrik
16-Feb-2008
[2814]
http://www.humanized.com/enso/words/<--- This seems like a good 
starting point for a full REBOL desktop. Remove Windows and base 
the input system directly on that. Nice and quick.
Reichart
17-Feb-2008
[2815x2]
Yes, Enso is cool.  Aza's father was one of the designers of the 
Mac.  I talked to him a few months ago about REBOL in fact.  I have 
been running Enso for a while now.  I should use it more, since it 
really is powerful.
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp


FF is at 37.2%..........yeah baby...and so man said IE would have 
a death grip...
Graham
17-Feb-2008
[2817x2]
It was arrogance
on MS's part
Pekr
17-Feb-2008
[2819x4]
IE is on death grip. In some EU countries FF is reaching over 45%.
IE is imo much less successfull. It is just point of view you look 
at it - When you start at nearly 100% market, and you are mostly 
arrogant monopolist, then we should thank to Mozilla foundation, 
because what they gained is imo significant achievement - very significant, 
imo.
The second factor is - IE's percentage is so high just becaues of 
one factor - it is preinstalled and that userbase does not really 
care - mostly corporations, etc. There was once time, when companies 
heavily used IE for intranets and used special features. IMO nowadays 
the situation is better - you can build good intranet solution using 
other browsers too.
Situation with mobile devices is even more interesting. We will see 
:-)
GiuseppeC
17-Feb-2008
[2823]
IE7 halts every couple of hours for me. Firefox is a better choice. 
Even on my costomers PC I prefer installing FireFox
Pekr
17-Feb-2008
[2824]
there is no IE .... there is just "that blue 'e' internet icon" :-)
Pekr
18-Feb-2008
[2825]
I was surprised, how far can you go with BASIC language :-) http://www.realbasic.com/products/realbasic/tour/
- complete IDE, debugger, the list of widgets is also cool ...
SteveT
18-Feb-2008
[2826]
Hi Petr, that takes me back a bit!  Does look pretty cool
btiffin
18-Feb-2008
[2827]
I couldn't find a link that wasn't plastered with on-line newspaper 
ads, but

New findings by the mission to Titan, reported on Wednesday by the 
European Space Agency (ESA), say Saturn's orange moon has hundreds 
of times more liquid hydrocarbons than all the known oil and natural 
gas reserves on Earth.


Google Saturn Moon Oil for more deets.   YeeHaw!  I think the space 
race is on.  And all we have to do is run a 1,200,000,000 km pipeline 
and we can all drive Hummers and have diesel powered air conditioners. 
 It's gonna be sweet.
Gregg
18-Feb-2008
[2828]
Petr, you've never heard of VB? :-) QuickBASIC, under DOS, had an 
IDE back in 1985. PowerBASIC (used to be TurboBASIC from Borland) 
is still around and has inline asm and a killer compiler. GFA BASIC 
had matrix math built in, and TrueBASIC had some very cool libraries, 
like 3D graphing, as part of the system. After VB there have been 
a lot of "BASIC-like" lanugaguges, but some of them aren't really 
BASIC.
Geomol
18-Feb-2008
[2829]
Saturn Moon Oil! :-D I can't help thinking, that it's all designed. 
;-) Someone put the carrot there for us, so we're now encouraged 
to take the next step up from our civilization cradle. (I hope, this 
comment is ok in this group, else: don't worry, be happy!)
Graham
18-Feb-2008
[2830]
There are hydrogen gas clouds out there that are larger than our 
Solar System.
btiffin
18-Feb-2008
[2831]
Well then, I wonder if Sol feels small?  Will the Sun get spam from 
Pfizer offering up a little blue planet pill  so it can compete with 
Wolf 359 for dates with Proxima Centauri?    :)
btiffin
19-Feb-2008
[2832]
So Blu-Ray won.   Toshiba just dropped it's HD-DVD business.   That 
means I should be able to pick up a player real cheap.  :)  Woohoo!
Graham
20-Feb-2008
[2833]
Why?  What can you do with it?
Henrik
20-Feb-2008
[2834]
lots of cheap HD movies
Edgar
20-Feb-2008
[2835]
Very  good and cheap for upconverting regular DVDs.
Pekr
7-Mar-2008
[2836]
Google creates protability API for its apps - http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Application-Development/Google-Creates-Portability-API-for-Its-Apps/
RobertS
9-Mar-2008
[2837]
I see that UNICON ( the language ) if yet to move to UNICODE in spite 
of its strong string handling and back-tracking features (co-routines, 
co-expressions)

There are remarkable similarities to REBOL ( ignoring its use of 
keywords such as &pos )
A recent variant is converge from Lawrence Tratt

Of course there is a big ISP named UNICON and someone has a DSL named 
UNICON

There is supposed to be a MAC version of ICON called PRO ICON ... 
I couldn't find it

My latest urban myth: that the name REBOL evolved from IDOL, the 
ICON pre-processor ( SNOBOL, ICON, IDOL, REBOL )
btiffin
9-Mar-2008
[2838]
All good coders should know of Dr. Ralph and of "farberisms"  ;)
BrianH
10-Mar-2008
[2839]
I was a big fan of Icon back before there was REBOL, but that goal-directed 
evaluation made Icon harder to debug than any other language in practical 
use, including assembler. That experience made it a lot easier to 
write PARSE code though :)
Louis
10-Mar-2008
[2840]
I came to REBOL from Icon also. Icon lacked communications abilities, 
and was not being developed.  It was great for working with strings, 
however.
Kaj
11-Mar-2008
[2841]
Interesting
Geomol
19-Mar-2008
[2842]
http://gizmodo.com/368651/new-video-of-bigdog-quadruped-robot-is-so-stunning-its-spooky
Reichart
19-Mar-2008
[2843]
Looks like two Chinese dancers in black pants facing each other, 
running around with a big car-like box over their heads....which 
is cool!
Robert
21-Mar-2008
[2844]
Reichart, you like strange things, don't you? ;-)
Reichart
21-Mar-2008
[2845]
: )
JohanAR
21-Mar-2008
[2846]
In a Swedish blog someone wrote a comment that the robot looked like 
two drunk guys carrying a sofa :P Then about half the people were 
worried that Iran/Iraq would copy it and put guns on it, and the 
other half were worried that USA would but guns on it. Either way 
it would probably only bring death, misery and oppression :)
Henrik
21-Mar-2008
[2847]
it looks like they need to work on the engine. if you are at war 
in the desert, and you hear the noise of a chainsaw in the distance, 
time to bring out the guns.
Reichart
23-Mar-2008
[2848]
Silent gun mounted versions are only a few years away.  Welcome to 
the start of the "new warrior"
Geomol
23-Mar-2008
[2849x2]
I want an army of battle droids as first seen in STAR WARS Episode 
I. ;-)
Roger roger!
At least they could bore the enemy to death with the continuous "Roger 
roger", so noone would go to war anymore. :-)
Reichart
23-Mar-2008
[2851]
Robots will be outlawed soon (yes, I said soon)... I give it less 
than 10 years.  I write it here for the record....
You will need permits to own or build them, etc...
RobertS
23-Mar-2008
[2852]
In Italy you can buy a still for distill home-brew but only if you 
leave on the label which says that it is illegal to distill spirits 
with that still ( according to en.wikipedia on moonshine)
Graham
23-Mar-2008
[2853]
what's the definition of a robot?
JohanAR
24-Mar-2008
[2854]
I think he refers to autonomous machines, rather than just any machine 
that resembles a human or an animal :) http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/robot
Pekr
27-Mar-2008
[2855]
Motorola loosers - http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/26/motorola-insider-tells-all-about-the-fall-of-a-technology-icon/
btiffin
1-Apr-2008
[2856]
Gee; and posted before April 1.   Vista not gaining; surprise surprise. 
 Can we finally start to shrink a monopoly?

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/operating_systems/windows_a_monopoly_shakes.html
Henrik
1-Apr-2008
[2857]
it would be so wonderful if they would just start from scratch with 
a new OS. just from scratch. screw compatibility. it will be a pain 
for a few years, but it will do them and us good in the end. I know 
they can do that.
btiffin
1-Apr-2008
[2858]
Or ...  start using an OS that doesn't cost an arm and a leg and 
where the primary concern is better software (or maybe, simple "Hey 
look what I wrote ... I'm smart"), not lock in.  :)

I still hold MS directly responsible for the early demise of OS/2. 
  Well, that and Homer Simpson's Compuglobalhypermeganet
Geomol
1-Apr-2008
[2859]
I'm not so sure, MS with its current configuration can make a good 
OS from scratch. Too many cooks.