r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Tech News] Interesting technology

Pekr
30-Jun-2008
[2954]
After few years of waiting, MorphOS is released - http://www.morphos-team.net/news.html

Quick read of OSNews comments reveals though, that it costs 150USD, 
which will bury it imo ...
Graham
30-Jun-2008
[2955x2]
111 before the cut off date ..
will this run only on A1 ?
PeterWood
4-Jul-2008
[2957]
Rebol 3 running under Flash? http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=52
Pekr
4-Jul-2008
[2958]
Interesting from deployment POV, but it would kind of mean that we 
gave up. As for Core, I can imagine it, but as for View? I don't 
know ...
Chris
4-Jul-2008
[2959x2]
Not really, it would be just another platform...
Another way to implement and deploy our dialects...
Pekr
9-Jul-2008
[2961]
Google opens its protocols - http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id;687925953
Graham
9-Jul-2008
[2962]
are we not surprised that Google does not use XML for it's protocols??
Sunanda
9-Jul-2008
[2963]
I'm not.....Google is shuffling terabytes of data with very short 
response times.

XML may be a good archive/interchange format -- a better .CSV format 
-- but it just does not scale for operational systems of the size 
Google has.
Maarten
13-Jul-2008
[2964]
We are not surprised. Although if they'd wrapped eveyrthing in a 
<google></google> , would that have made a difference ;-)
Henrik
25-Jul-2008
[2965]
DragonFly BSD is now at version 2.0 with the Hammer filesystem now 
implemented.
btiffin
2-Aug-2008
[2966]
Try CUIL.  http://cuil.comSearch REBOL.  Nice page, could almost 
be a nice rebol.com frontpage.  CUIL is a google spinoff.
Gabriele
4-Aug-2008
[2967]
this seems more interesting than cuil, but probably very limited: 
http://www.trueknowledge.com/technology/screenshots/
Pekr
13-Aug-2008
[2968]
OpenGL 3.0 specs released - http://www.khronos.org/news/press/releases/khronos_releases_opengl_30_specifications_to_support_latest_generations_of/
Geomol
14-Aug-2008
[2969]
Exciting! :-)
Pekr
14-Aug-2008
[2970]
Some ppl just call it evolution, not revolution. Some others do appraise 
DirectX, as it works with sound, input devices, etc.
Henrik
14-Aug-2008
[2971]
Did anyone see the Cinema 2.0 stuff from ATI? That's pretty amazing. 
It's basically voxel graphics with raytracing. It looks almost as 
good as prerendered graphics, but it's fully realtime.
Pekr
20-Aug-2008
[2972]
Article posted to ML by Carley Simon. I can see many of Carl's visions 
there. Might be good overal target for R3.


 - http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/future_of_the_desktop.php
 - discusses Web3.0
Oldes
20-Aug-2008
[2973]
ECMAScript disharmony = http://ncannasse.free.fr/?p=82

http://whydoeseverythingsuck.com/2008/08/ru-roh-adobe-screwed-by-ecmascript.html
BrianH
20-Aug-2008
[2974]
If you look at the postings by the actual people involved in the 
discussion, you will realize that there is no disharmony now, and 
Adobe is not screwed - they were involved in this decision and agreed 
to it.
Kaj
21-Aug-2008
[2975]
Ah, flame/ad bait journalism
Oldes
21-Aug-2008
[2976x2]
Agreed to decision, that MS is not following their proposed standard:) 
I don't mind much.. I'm quite like Nicolas, I can use Rebol to create 
the Adobe's VM bytecode:)
I just can see another room of hell in possible incompatibilities 
between IE and other browsers in near future.
Henrik
22-Aug-2008
[2978]
I'm so tempted to just ignore IE as a developer. My latest site fails 
only in IE. If they don't want to play ball in standardization, then 
screw them. I'm just wondering if it would be so bad if all developers 
just ignored IE.
Chris
22-Aug-2008
[2979]
Progressive Enhancement.  Web Sites don't need to fail...
Rebolek
22-Aug-2008
[2980]
It's much easier to ignore IE when you don't have to support it.
Chris
23-Aug-2008
[2981]
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/gbs/
Kaj
23-Aug-2008
[2982]
Good stuff, thanks
Kaj
28-Aug-2008
[2983x2]
Doesn't seem to have been posted yet, and it's an important article:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10002150-92.html
shadwolf
30-Aug-2008
[2985]
my lcd screen for my computer is dead only after 1 year of use. Syntoma 
when i turn it on the power led indication flash during 5 to 10 minutes 
before the screen lights and became stable. this pumping effect seems 
to be current in the new generation of LCD screen and seems to be 
related to the defective of chimicals condensator next to the alimentation 
block .... having to spend 130 euros  in a new screen only becaue 
two condensators of 0.60 euro are deficient that really piss me off
Graham
30-Aug-2008
[2986x2]
most brand name LCD screens come with 3 year warranties.
Even then, we have consumer protection here ... so even if it dies 
after the warranty period, it can be argued that to die after 1 years 
use indicates that it was not for fit for the purpose for which it 
was sold.
shadwolf
30-Aug-2008
[2988x3]
unfortunatly that a no brand "you are just fucked up" lcd screen 
...
well dead for dead i can affort a trip to my favorite electronics 
shop and by some condensator and remplace them
if it works I will earn 130  euros  ^^
Graham
30-Aug-2008
[2991x2]
Auction sites often have cheap LCD screens
Dell dumps their excess stock on auction sites here.
shadwolf
30-Aug-2008
[2993]
I will replace the  condensators and if it works  good for me if 
it doesn't well it doesn't ...
Graham
30-Aug-2008
[2994]
condensors
shadwolf
30-Aug-2008
[2995x2]
condom soars ?
muaaaaawhaaaaaaaahahahaha
Graham
30-Aug-2008
[2997]
how many babies do you have?
shadwolf
30-Aug-2008
[2998x3]
none ...
that's a pity those condensors .... the whole screen is new and working 
well apart the pump efect on starting
once the condensors are charged if I turn on/off the screen it worst 
without problem
Anton
31-Aug-2008
[3001]
shadwolf, is "Syntoma" the brand of the LCD monitor ?

Having to wait 5 - 10 minutes before seeing a picture would be a 
waste of time.
Are you sure you cannot get your supplier to replace it ?

If you can fix it, that is good, but you have not earned any money. 
You will have lost both money and time.
Kaj
31-Aug-2008
[3002x2]
That's what happens with no-name stuff
I used to have a computer store and I quickly noticed that many products 
just look like the products they're supposed to be, but really aren't