World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
Terry 6-Mar-2006 [322x2] | robotic mule http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGrMMlNjBB8&feature=Views&page=1&t=t&f=b |
This is good.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49IDp76kjPw&feature=Views&page=1&t=t&f=b | |
Geomol 6-Mar-2006 [324] | :-D That robotic mule is really funny! Amazing and interesting, what's possible these days. |
Anton 6-Mar-2006 [325] | Yeah, kind of spooky without a head, though :) |
[unknown: 10] 6-Mar-2006 [326x2] | http://www.pyweek.org/ |
woeps.. | |
Pekr 6-Mar-2006 [328x2] | Gaining root access to a Mac is 'easy pickings', according to an individual who won an OS X hacking challenge last month by gaining root control of a machine using an unpublished security vulnerability. On February 22, a Sweden-based Mac enthusiast set his Mac Mini as a server and invited hackers to break through the computer's security and gain root control, which would allow the attacker to take charge of the computer and delete files and folders or install applications. Within hours of going live, the 'rm-my-mac' competition was over. The challenger posted this message on his Web site: "This sucks. Six hours later this poor little Mac was owned and this page got defaced". |
I wonder if unix is more secure or just it is less exposed to hackers :-) | |
JaimeVargas 6-Mar-2006 [330x2] | Same competition was done for obsd and has not been claimed ever. |
The problem imho is not necesarily the OS but how all the apps and networking layer on the OS are configured. by default. OBSD is paranoic for this so very little is open or install, but as you install things like apache, you maybe opening holes for system exploits. | |
Pekr 6-Mar-2006 [332] | nice ... isn't openbsd or netbsd regarded being one of the most secure systems? |
Mchean 6-Mar-2006 [333] | Pekr: do u have a URL for that article? |
Pekr 6-Mar-2006 [334] | http://www.osnews.com/- go there - there is also discussion and the link to the original article ... |
JaimeVargas 6-Mar-2006 [335] | openbsd is regarded as the most secured opensource OS. I am shure than the NSA has something better. Two of my friends work for them. |
[unknown: 10] 6-Mar-2006 [336] | Yes Obsd has a very nice qualification scheme..and Im very happy with it ;-) |
Ashley 6-Mar-2006 [337] | isn't openbsd or netbsd regarded being one of the most secure systems? ... I thought MVS (IBM Mainframe OS) has that honour? |
Sunanda 6-Mar-2006 [338] | MVS is called Z/OS these days. Hard to hack -- but then not many people wouid have the skills to even get started: the concepts are so different to what you'd expect from a PC or UNIX background. But not impossible |
Ashley 6-Mar-2006 [339] | That Mac article (from MS-owned ZDnet) has been widely discredited. From a follow up article on OSnews: The ZDnet article, and almost all of the coverage of it, failed to mention a very critical point: anyone who wished it was given a local account on the machine (which could be accessed via ssh). Original ZDnet article: http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/security/soa/Mac_OS_X_hacked_in_less_than_30_minutes/0,2000061744,39241748,00.htm Follow up challenge: http://test.doit.wisc.edu/ |
Anton 7-Mar-2006 [340] | Well there you go. |
[unknown: 10] 8-Mar-2006 [341x2] | . |
The story is now finsished http://test.doit.wisc.edu/with a positive result...the Mac was not hacked ;-) | |
Henrik 8-Mar-2006 [343] | I think the testing period was too short |
[unknown: 10] 8-Mar-2006 [344x2] | That was a new hack attempt btw... |
Today I was just confronted with a 1 minute hack on VMS ;-) ..but that was a local account issue too :-) Still is fnu sometimes.. | |
Ashley 8-Mar-2006 [346] | Web 2.0 Baloney by John C. Dvorak: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1931858,00.asp |
Terry 8-Mar-2006 [347] | Dvorak is a web 1.0 dinosaur. |
JaimeVargas 8-Mar-2006 [348] | Devorak is a dinosaur. |
Volker 9-Mar-2006 [349] | They said they where worried about the bandwidth. seems that is the only thing which can stop a mac. :) |
[unknown: 10] 9-Mar-2006 [350] | It's Official! Windows XP Boots on Macbook!!!! http://www.mathcaddy.com/windowsxpbootsonamac%21%21%21%211/ |
[unknown: 9] 9-Mar-2006 [351] | that is pretty cool. |
Pekr 9-Mar-2006 [352x2] | I thought that you want the opposite - to run OS-X on general x86 hw, no? :-) |
what is so special on Mac x86 machine to run WinXP on it? It just does not make sense ... | |
Henrik 9-Mar-2006 [354] | they don't have a BIOS |
Pekr 9-Mar-2006 [355] | there are already really good notebooks out there, being it Dell or IBM or Acer, whatever ... |
JaimeVargas 9-Mar-2006 [356] | Pekr. Just check out the site. ;_) |
Henrik 9-Mar-2006 [357] | I don't see it either. Dual booting is a clumsy solution. It would be a lot more fun to just let them run inside OSX like OS9 apps run under OSX currently. |
Pekr 9-Mar-2006 [358] | I will maybe read the article - It is one day old news I found on OSnews.com, but It did not attract me ... I will read it to see ... |
Henrik 9-Mar-2006 [359] | pekr, it's fake. it's just a joke image |
[unknown: 10] 16-Mar-2006 [360x4] | http://www.sixapart.com/...everyperson a blog ;-) |
And another one hitting the race.. -> http://officelive.microsoft.com/ | |
BUT here it is !!! XP boots on MAC (No joke this time!! ;-) http://youtube.com/watch?v=nzH6OFpXgzI | |
They claim anyway... ;-) | |
Allen 16-Mar-2006 [364] | Museum of Modern Betas - http://momb.socio-kybernetics.net/ |
[unknown: 9] 16-Mar-2006 [365x2] | Coo. |
cool. | |
[unknown: 10] 17-Mar-2006 [367x2] | Its NOT fake... here is the proof.... http://onmac.net/They earned 14000 Dollars with it! |
and another goole release hits the road... http://base.google.com/ | |
Ryan 19-Mar-2006 [369] | Google/base is yet another uniquely simple offering from google that completely changes everything. |
Terry 19-Mar-2006 [370] | All your base are belong to Google |
[unknown: 10] 22-Mar-2006 [371] | and another google...http://finance.google.com/finance |
older newer | first last |