World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
Graham 9-Jan-2006 [34] | oh .. needs pc still. |
[unknown: 9] 9-Jan-2006 [35x3] | Yeah, I was under the impression this had been worked out also. |
Well, if anyone learns more, speak up. | |
I talk to a lot of you over Skype right now, I just wish I was not attached to my computer. | |
Anton 9-Jan-2006 [38x5] | Mmm... some negative criticisms of Skype. It may make your computer a supernode, then you will be doing a lot of switching for the network. |
An alternative service is wavigo, which I will check out now. | |
(still didn't see any skype direct from router technology yet.) | |
huh :) http://www.wavigo.com/ | |
Perhaps better than Skype because it claims "No supernodes", but you still need a computer as it uses a proprietary protocol. | |
[unknown: 9] 9-Jan-2006 [43] | Yeah, and Skype wins since so many people have it. good or bad. |
ReViewer 9-Jan-2006 [44] | Maybe "supernoding" improves the final quality also compare to a more simple P2P? |
Anton 9-Jan-2006 [45x7] | That could be the case, and may explain why Skype became so popular so quickly. |
Anyone else noticing that google seems to be getting worse ? | |
(with regard to advertising). Or are the advertisers getting too strong for google ? | |
(Wavigo has a mode for connecting to Skype, by the way, so there could be a "leak" from Skype's powerful position.) | |
Graham, yep your link first takes us to actiontec.com, but if you read carefully it still requires the use of a PC. :-( | |
I suspect unless you read it in big bold type (because it would be big news when it would happen) it is safe to assume that the feature is not there. | |
None of the D-Link stuff seems to support the Skype codec either. | |
Graham 9-Jan-2006 [52] | The thing is Linksys routers run linux.. so it shouldn't be that difficult to build in the skype code. |
[unknown: 9] 9-Jan-2006 [53] | Agreed. Their little linux router is pretty cool. |
Pekr 10-Jan-2006 [54] | What router? The best so far is Mikrotik :-) |
Anton 10-Jan-2006 [55] | You'd reckon someone would already have done that if Skype would allow it, don't you think ? |
Pekr 10-Jan-2006 [56x3] | hmm, I just read about allpeers extension for Firefox, which is supposed to become a killer app! What will it allow? To share amongst defined set of friends, so riaa and mpaa can't find you ... altme anyone? It is a pity plug-in is not production ready, or such solution could be introduced by rebol app :-) |
Powerfull 2D vector animation package was opensourced due to business problems - http://www.synfig.com/overview/ | |
interview with the author is here - http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=13241 . ... maybe Cyphre could use some techniques for draw, but it is GPL :-) | |
Henrik 10-Jan-2006 [59x4] | Apple keynote begins in 27 minutes... http://www.macrumorslive.com/web |
and here we go... | |
new iMac dual core 2 Ghz intel. about 2-3 times faster than the current model | |
new MacBook Pro to replace the powerbook. 4-5 times faster than the current powerbook | |
JaimeVargas 10-Jan-2006 [63] | So Reichart when are you moving to OSX. Speed is no longer an excuse ;-) |
[unknown: 9] 10-Jan-2006 [64] | Funny enough, I will be posting soon two articles: "Why I don't use the Mac" and "Why I don't use Linux" and I was going to open this up to everyone to do battle with me on each point. The idea being that all can learn from this and make the move to the machine they like best. For some people they might read one of the articles and say "those five things don't matter to me, so I'm going to buy a Mac now" For others, it will serve as a thermometer of when it is worth going to Mac or Linux. |
Pekr 10-Jan-2006 [65x4] | And I would post the article too "Why I don't use MagmaOS" :-), but the reasons are obvious :-) I want small rebol os :-) |
new PowerBook is stylish ... | |
just what does Apple think? I hate their quick-time crap ... | |
they should use Nvidia, not ATI :-) | |
Graham 10-Jan-2006 [69] | I find it hard to believe that any new "pc" can be 2-3x faster than another. What metric are they using?? |
Pekr 10-Jan-2006 [70x2] | they always twist the logic. They twisted it even in case of defending their PPC ... |
they gave up on PPC was too fast .... | |
Graham 10-Jan-2006 [72] | just marketing hype |
Pekr 10-Jan-2006 [73] | IBM proved their designs are good - xbox, PS3 Cell ... |
Graham 10-Jan-2006 [74x2] | Maybe their OSX runs 2-3x faster on Intel cpus ? |
In which case it must have been running on seriously underpowered processors before. | |
Pekr 10-Jan-2006 [76x2] | but overall, I am all for new technologies. I have to say I was REALLY scared of Intel's future. AMD just got better, and Itanium was really a fiasco ... |
Now Intel is getting into more cores, home media convergence processors, etc. ... that is good. Companies should care about efficiency. I want my PC to be here instead of my DVD player, with all the codecs, but I don't want to HEAR it ... no single spinning cooler allowed ... that is why I am looking into mini-itx stuff ... | |
Henrik 10-Jan-2006 [78x2] | graham, it's most likely OSX and not just raw benchmarks that they use to measure speed |
and the powerbook was grossly underpowered | |
[unknown: 9] 10-Jan-2006 [80] | Of note, I WANT to NOT be on Windows. I'm getting closer every day. In fact the spell checker in Qtask means I don't use Word so much, but we need to add a scaling input box (I like to see more of what I'm writing). We are going to get the spell dictionary into AltME eventually. |
Henrik 10-Jan-2006 [81x2] | it's important to consider that Apple aren't trying to compete with PC makers. they are competing with their own software department. it's easy for them now to create software that'll only run on highend macs. It's kind of silly for them to sell iMovie, tout its HDTV editing capabilities and only be able to run the application properly on high end macs. |
pekr, Apple have been waiting to shift to Intel for the past 5 years. IBM gave them delivery problems and couldn't deliver mobile CPUs and it's been a fight to keep up on all levels. I suspect Steve saw the initial switch to PPC as a mistake and that gave them a lot of problems. | |
Ashley 10-Jan-2006 [83] | Pekr, "why I am looking into mini-itx stuff". I have been waiting for nano-ITX for the last two years ... and in that time Apple have released Mac mini and announced Mac mini for x86. I've done the sums, even with the wholesale prices I can get on most of the PC components (Via board, laptop HDD, RAM, Case plus time/cost of assembly), and the current Mac mini still comes out cheaper and quieter even with all the Mac software pre-bundled. If Apple can release the new Intel-based Mac mini at the same or better prices, with the same or better specs, then why would anyone wait for Via to get their act together when they can buy a cost-effective off-the-shelf solution today, even if it means ditching OS X for Linux or Windows?! |
older newer | first last |