r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Tech News] Interesting technology

ICarii
19-Apr-2009
[3819]
the trick is to possibly send location on drop - then verify serverside
[unknown: 5]
19-Apr-2009
[3820x2]
Yeah - that should do it!
Dunno, you still have to show the locations on the client end so 
they know where to drag.
ICarii
19-Apr-2009
[3822x2]
send an image
eg: drag the object onto the purple rabbit - have an image with 20 
or so differentr rabbits
[unknown: 5]
19-Apr-2009
[3824x3]
Possible.
How about this.  You  display a rather large image and the user must 
click the very center of image (hold down button) and drag to a border 
speciied within the image.  The image changes.
For example say the image is just a picture of a large ball or circle. 
 The person clicks the center of the circle and holds down to expand 
to the perimeter of the circle in the image and releases and this 
gets interpretes as radius back to the server.
ICarii
19-Apr-2009
[3827]
still open to image analysis attack
Oldes
19-Apr-2009
[3828]
Captachas are agains people, not bots. Bots are mostly very simple, 
especially the one which just puts links into fields. Why they would 
spend time on image analysis when they just can travel on another 
site with simple forms. fields.
ICarii
19-Apr-2009
[3829]
they broke the gmail captcha and yahoo and hotmail by use of image 
analysis.
Oldes
19-Apr-2009
[3830]
people.. not bots:)
ICarii
19-Apr-2009
[3831]
oh - i thought they were reported to have automated it?
Oldes
19-Apr-2009
[3832]
I don't think there is any bot just browsing around searching for 
another captcha to break in:) I can call it "a script" which someone 
could use to break gmail captcha, but not "a bot". Anyway... I bet 
they used many people to just click and  traslate the images.
ICarii
19-Apr-2009
[3833x2]
http://securitylabs.websense.com/content/Blogs/2919.aspx
very interesting info on teh gmail break
Oldes
19-Apr-2009
[3835]
Yes... also there is a prove that someone pay for recognizing pictures. 
Anyway... if you have a normal site and don't want links in your 
form fields as Paul has.. using simple JS document.write is enough 
to hide the submit button ans stop the bots. At least that's my experience.
Pekr
20-Apr-2009
[3836x2]
Our general media portal reports, that SUN is being bought by Oracle. 
I thought that it was IBM who tried to acquire them? Anyone confirms 
the news?
Hmm, I wonder what happens to Open Office and MySQL then ....
Janko
20-Apr-2009
[3838x2]
Hm.. I imagine they have hard time selling Oracle if MySQL is free.. 
I wouldn't like to be mysql right now :)
I didn't know Oracle even exists in last years, and surelly not that 
they have so much $$ to buy Sun (+ MySQL )... I am not sure if they 
are very present in web-scene
Pekr
20-Apr-2009
[3840]
They might close mySQL, but I think that the licence forbids them 
doing so. They might close further mySQL developments, but in such 
a case, I think that some ppl would fork it anyway ...
BrianH
20-Apr-2009
[3841]
Oracle already owns the company thaat makes the InnoDB engine for 
MySQL, and that didn't kill MySQL.
Robert
20-Apr-2009
[3842x3]
I don't think that SAP will ike this.
Oracle moves away from a one-product company. Strategically a good 
step. And owning a lot of datastorage infrastructure within the companies 
makes them a logical choice for the other layers.
But overall, I don't like this happening... when will Oracle DBs 
internally use ZFS?
Pekr
20-Apr-2009
[3845]
What is wrong with ZFS?
Robert
21-Apr-2009
[3846]
Nothing. I'm using it on OSX. My message referrs to two topics:
1. Oracle buys Sun -> I don't like it
2. Maybe ZFS will now become more a DB thing than a FS thing.
Pekr
21-Apr-2009
[3847]
Google releases plugin for 3D API - http://arstechnica.com/software/news/2009/04/google-releases-3d-graphics-plugin-for-browsers.ars
Janko
21-Apr-2009
[3848]
hm.. very interesting.. now unity3d (and ston3d) got some competition
Geomol
21-Apr-2009
[3849x2]
O3D is an open-source web API for creating rich, interactive 3D applications 
in the browser.


Wow, 3D games in the browser! It just gets better and better! What 
a wonderful world! ;-)
Maybe we'll even be able to use the back button, when someone shoot 
us in the game.
Rebolek
21-Apr-2009
[3851]
LOL
Janko
21-Apr-2009
[3852x2]
:)
plugins that offer hardware accelerated rendering are not that rare 
but there is none except shockwave (and now unity slowly) that have 
any worthwile base of users that have it already installed. This 
one would be great if it gets forward becuase it's the "google's" 
plugin, but for games it also needs sound, good input / fullscreen 
switching and to compete to ston3d and unity physics
Henrik
22-Apr-2009
[3854]
I like O3D alot. It makes me nostalgic, a 3D simulator right out 
of 1995 with the single digit framerates and all. Every day, new 
and amazing ways to slow down your computer.
Janko
22-Apr-2009
[3855]
:)
Henrik
1-May-2009
[3856]
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/see_wolfram_alpha_in_action_-_video_and_screenshots.php
Maxim
1-May-2009
[3857]
3D layers for the web have been around for years... but it seems 
people don't really care en masse.  I wonder if its the technology 
or if its a culture thing.
Chris
4-May-2009
[3858x2]
Not sure if this has been discussed, but has anyone compared Adobe 
Air to REBOL/View or /SDK?
In terms of end result, that is - not necessarily of the languages 
involved.
[unknown: 5]
4-May-2009
[3860]
Chris, we had some discussions recently in the Tretbase thread concerning 
them.
Chris
4-May-2009
[3861]
How far back?  (appears to be beyond my current threshold)
[unknown: 5]
4-May-2009
[3862x2]
Was just a few days ago.
I may have my ALTME settings on a greater buffer than you but the 
conversation in there was quite brisk for a day or two.  What was 
it that you wanted to discuss on the topic?
Chris
4-May-2009
[3864x5]
I've really only come across it - it seems a shame that it is being 
used in ways View has not (but could have).  That said, it seems 
to solve problems that View has not (yet) in rich text, cross-platform 
use of native menus - generally good desktop/web hybrids.
You're stuck, of course, with web/ajax/flash, which I trust is as 
much a pain as traditional web development, yet is well documented.
(web being html/js/dom)
Deployment seems smooth (that is, I've had no issues installing applications 
mac/pc) and the site-specific applications I've tried offers much 
over vanilla browser versions.
Note that these are first impressions - I really don't know how much 
of a drag these apps are, or how much polish went into the particular 
apps I tried.