World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
Ashley 24-Mar-2006 [422] | runrev: I think this is based on / was hypercard? |
Henrik 24-Mar-2006 [423] | http://www.smarthouse.com.au/Computing/Platforms?Article=/Computing/Platforms/R7G5G6U4 <--- things seem to be really bad in Microsoft Land. Or rewrites are healthy? |
Terry 24-Mar-2006 [424] | IE 7 is one of the buggiest pieces of garbage I've ever come across.. here's one problem I had.. (a quoted solution.) This is just so Microsoft" it should almost be expected. I had recently installed IE7 in an unsupported way using the instructions found here. The nice thing about this, is that it lets you run IE7 side by side with IE6. As a developer, there's no way to just let IE7 install itself over IE6, so I thought this would be a good solution. Fired up IE7 for the first time and it took about 2 minutes for me to realize there is just no possible reason why anybody would find this useful at all. Not for end users... not for developers... it just doesn't work right. The new toolbars are not that special either, IMO. So, that was it. At least for Beta 2. Fast-forward one week and I'm doing some serious testing of one of my new apps. Of course, I'm testing on the fly in Firefox but testing in both browsers after finishing all pieces of major functionality. Enter my URL into IE, press enter... and bang... up comes Firefox with the page I loaded!?!?! Uh... what? Google to the rescue. A search for "IE Launches Firefox" returned only 2 results... but luckily, one of them had the solution. It seems that a registry key installed when IE7 is run causes this situation. Just brilliant. From the IE Blog... locate this registry key and remove it: HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{c90250f3-4d7d-4991-9b69-a5c5bc1c2ae6} As stated... it fixed my problem. Thanks Microsoft... |
DideC 24-Mar-2006 [425] | The windows registry is probably the most "crappy" (native english speaker, please replace this word by the word that is in my head and I can't find) invention of all the computer history. If you have a problem and it's not hardware, then it's 99% chance it's a registry problem. The 1% rest is for files and DLL problem. My boring all day experience. |
Gregg 24-Mar-2006 [426] | Crappy is just fine Dide. :-) There are stronger choices, which might apply to the registry, but "crappy" gets the point across without being offensive (IMO). |
DideC 27-Mar-2006 [427x2] | Put one that is offensive, please ;-)) |
Bill already own the high score in "Bird names" (direct french translation for a non offensive manner to represents offensive words ;-) given by all the world computer guys who tried to make Windows X Y working. I think he is rising over Adolph H. in this area (no, ok, bad joke here). | |
Pekr 30-Mar-2006 [429] | hmm, hmm - http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1944044,00.asp - Ruby on rails takes on Java ... interesting how Carl is right - ppl don't buy technologies, they buy solutions ... and Rails is solution, which makes Ruby a king ... although it all is surrounded by nice hype ..... |
Terry 31-Mar-2006 [430x3] | What solution does Ruby provide? |
(RoR) | |
(hmm, that could be missed.. I meant to say What solution does RoR provide?) | |
yeksoon 31-Mar-2006 [433] | RoR like most other framework, sells the ease to get things done. What I think makes them standout, is the way they SHOW it. 1. Ruby itself is always a 'simpler' approach to Java. That is one EASE 2. They SHOW you on their webcast...and they said it themselves. 'SHOW, Don't Tell' http://rubyonrails.org/screencasts 3. And they also SHOW it by using tools other programmers use, eg TextMate, drawing a targetted group potential user. The success of RoR puts a lot of big companies to shame. (given the resources they have) |
Terry 31-Mar-2006 [434x6] | I've toyed with RoR, and frankly, it doesn't impress. For one thing, the syntax is archaic... like this.. def self.up add_column "posts", "author_name", :string Post.find(:all).each {|posts|posts.update_attribute :author_name, "Anonymous"} end def self.down.... |
yuk | |
Framewerks semantic data model makes this look pale. | |
(or schema for the intellectual types) | |
Being symbolic, a query can be as little as 3 bytes. | |
Whoever heard of a 3 byte database query? | |
Sunanda 31-Mar-2006 [440] | I have. |
Ashley 31-Mar-2006 [441] | Real men play with bits not bytes , er? |
eFishAnt 31-Mar-2006 [442x2] | Digital is only saturated Analog, so a bit can be split to various levels, but then logic become fuzzy. |
Our wetware uses sub-bit queries. | |
Davide 1-Apr-2006 [444] | After Ruby on rails, Sql on rails. How to make killer web apps: http://sqlonrails.org/screencast |
Terry 1-Apr-2006 [445x2] | That says it all, Davide |
Ok, how about 16581375 different declaration or queries using only 3 bytes? | |
Thør 2-Apr-2006 [447] | initial sync... |
Henrik 5-Apr-2006 [448x2] | http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/<--- Apple Boot Camp, lets you partition and dual-boot OSX and XP easily on Intel Macs |
the timing is kind of funny, since hackers have been working their asses off to win the big prize on getting XP to run on macs. now Apple offers an official solution, which they said they wouldn't do | |
[unknown: 10] 5-Apr-2006 [450x6] | Its funny indeed.. I just wonrder if they did had it on the shelf already... |
in 2 weeks time a cooperation of micorsoft together with Apple can build very nice applications that bring money ;-) | |
who would think of this.. actualy its a nice idea...-> http://ilps.science.uva.nl/MoodViews/ | |
http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2006/03/hiring-lake-wobegon-strategy.html | |
http://www.dumpalink.com/media/1144224508/WOW_With_Touch_Screen_Technology | |
it s about the movie not the silly website around it.. | |
JaimeVargas 11-Apr-2006 [456] | A Year in the Life of a BSD Guru Josh Berkus of PostgreSQL http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/unix/bsd/archives/008710.asp |
Anton 11-Apr-2006 [457] | Jaime, I presume you post such an article to bring to attention the interesting release process they have, with "Feature Freeze" etc. |
JaimeVargas 11-Apr-2006 [458] | Yes, and that he considers the Open Source movement the success story in biz, while the old model is dying the lawyers from the past are trying to derail it. |
Henrik 13-Apr-2006 [459x2] | http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-6060741.html<--- Google to launch calendar application |
http://calendar.google.com<--- actually it's open now | |
Brock 13-Apr-2006 [461] | re: Google Calendar: Chris Sherman, executive editor of Search Engine Watch.com. "The interface is classic Google--clean, crisp and relatively uncluttered.... The one down side to the program is you have to be online when you use it" |
Geomol 13-Apr-2006 [462] | All those Google applications. Wouldn't it be a lot better user experience, if REBOL clients were made, instead of having the applications inside a browser? Might be a good plan: 1) Get people away from MS products. It's not the best solution having everything inside a browser, but it lets them know again, that they have a choice. 2) Now people have choices, they can choose the best solution, which is REBOL reblets. |
Graham 13-Apr-2006 [463] | Let's see some nice hovers etc from Rebol apps. |
Geomol 13-Apr-2006 [464] | We just need someone to make the applications in REBOL. Any investors around? |
Graham 13-Apr-2006 [465] | and rich text. |
Henrik 13-Apr-2006 [466] | and list views |
Pekr 13-Apr-2006 [467] | VIA finally delivers on resource savy, yet powerfull CPUs - http://arosshow.blogspot.com/2006/04/this-is-interview-with-aros-developer.html |
Henrik 13-Apr-2006 [468] | wrong link? |
Pekr 13-Apr-2006 [469] | http://www.viaarena.com/default.aspx?PageID=5&ArticleID=462&P=1 |
Oldes 14-Apr-2006 [470] | http://www.infoverse.org/octomatics/octomatics.htm |
[unknown: 10] 14-Apr-2006 [471] | OTTAWA — California-based linguist Paul Payack expects the English language to gain its one-millionth word this autumn. The language has come a long way indeed, as the English would say, in 400 years. In 1582, the English grammarian Richard Mulcaster could say that the language was "of small reach, stretching no further than this island of ours, nay not there over all. http://www.languagemonitor.com/ |
older newer | first last |