World: r3wp

Works now for me too. It was down for a half-hour here. Weird.

Sometimes when I think a website is down, it turns out to be some 
problem at my (or my ISP's) end. This is a good way to check:
   http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/

Or, http://downforrt.com/

I saw people saying that FB is down on twitter too. 


My guess it needed to reboot to switch into now I own the whole internet 
mode (did you hear about new features presented on f8)?

It was down for me in Hawaii FTR.

Nice analysis of the recent attack on apache.org:
   https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_org_04_09_2010

Great info. Thanks for posting that Sunanda.

I got the email from Atlassian too about their attack

I had been testing confluence and Jira

Opera 10.5.2 for MAC released - http://www.opera.com/press/releases/2010/04/27/

When ever I read something like this it is like I just got news a 
friend was murdered while working around their house.

There is a virus called Security Tool.  It is really evil, http://www.2-spyware.com/remove-security-tool.html


But what gets me is, with something like this, that is so popular, 
why have we not hunted down the assholes that wrote it, and made 
a public example of them?

Never heard of this one - EKEN M001 "Tablet", 100 USD price level 
... article is in Czech,  but contains photos and video ....

http://www.zive.cz/clanky/eken-m001-maly-tablet-pc-s-androidem-za-dva-tisice/sc-3-a-152037/default.aspx

Reichart - aren't those prohibited business practicess? It is misleading 
customers.

Reichart...I agree. I do not understand with the millions, maybe 
billions lost in time, resources etc why there is not some  agency 
set up to get this type of scam....they are hiding in plain site.

Kind of interesting - zoomable web sites

http://ahead.com/#view/lilaspaces/main/welcome?scene=HOME

HP buys Palm ... http://www.osnews.com/story/23221/HP_Buys_Palm


My take - a pity Palm was not bought by HTC. For me HP is big failure. 
Company without a vision, who killed Compaq by the merge.

Pekr, it is an actual federal crime, and could be considered an act 
of war!  I'm not clear why they don't go after this.

I am not sure I can understand. Is it a sarcasm? :-)

..hunted down... / ...act of war...

looks like the media-(I.tell you the thruth!)-meme just reached maui 
;-))

Just to make sure we are all clear here... I'm using no humour.


I believe Pekr to have asked me about the link I posted to the virus 
called "Security Tool".

By asking me if it is a "prohibited business practice" he is implying 
it is a business in the first place.
I see no evidence this is a real product, or a business.


In any case, let's pretend that it is a real product, now let's pretend 
(and this does not require much of a stretch) that it gets onto your 
doctor's computer, who is trying to look up an emergency peice of 
data.


This softtware actually PREVENTS other software from running on your 
computer.


If we prove malice, which is not hard to do here, then ALL issues 
are open.  It is not going to happen, but I would fight for this 
to be a felony, and put them in prison:

- Obstruciton of justive
- Distrubing the piece
- You can tack on to anything "With teh intent to do harm"

etc.

who don't remember the situation where do you wish having direct 
access to a virus hacker's face 
in the moment you are cleaning up your computer. 

but what I mean with my post was not humor also, it was about relation. 
for a very short moment your 

words (hunted/war) remind me a to another person using this 'size 
of reality building symbols' very 

strongly with a current result many people don't like. it is also 
significant to see how words

going into a kind of inflation and devaluating quickly by it's unrelational 
usage supported by the media. 
therefore the reference to the media who is responible for this.

on the other hand and just to make it complete,


the media industry gave so much love for free, I can't say how much 
I appreciating this.

they teached us don't spare to much on using love, there are important 
items for us which deserve it, really! 
like to love a cheese? no problem, now we can...
like to love a new flat TV? no problem, we can now also...

like to love a fatty, stinky, unhealthy burger? well this was difficult 
but now...guess!


and the real benefit we have with this fantastic memetic innovation 
is a nice usefull inflation.
(yes, as mentioned this works on words too).

we are now in the convenienced position to use this word daily without 
the risk of any deeper meaning

and the best of all is, the more we are using this word for all these 
other important things, the lower the 'ancient' value by time.
btw I love you all...(this is real progress isn't it? :-)))))

Amazon AWS is now officially available in Singapore (serving the 
APAC regions). http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2010/04/now-open-aws-region-in-asia-pacific.html

Cool.

Pekr, my understanding is that HP's purchase of Compaq was a big 
mistake for HP.  Compaq's desktop business was low value, and their 
servers were also low end.  I believe they lost a lot on that one.

The view is that HP has purchased Palm to get access to WebOS so 
that they didn't have to develop their own.  The own slate compared 
with the iPad is a dog in terms of battery life, speed and  screen 
resolution, and they had long given up on Arm devices.

their own ...

And WebOS being linux based will run on their x86 slate ... .  HP 
will then end up with the whole stack

And since Rebol can't get on to the iPad, we should have access to 
HP's slate instead .. so this looks good for us.

Plus, HP's leadership when they purchased Compaq is completely different 
from who runs the company now.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/05/microsoft_ie9_and_canvasn/

IE9 won't support HTML5 canvas.

Interesting and surprising - they wanted to position themselves to 
the top again ...

I believe on of the commenters is right in that MS wants to push 
for Silverlight adoption.

Interesting - I interpreted it as "MS employees are prohibited from 
promising anything they might not deliver, especially after the Longhorn 
debacle". They don't say they aren't doing Canvas, just that they 
can't commit to doing Canvas. Clearly the IE team wants to, but since 
they haven't started writing the code yet they are being smart and 
not making promises. The IE team hasn't been preannouncing features 
until they can *demonstrate* features.

http://video.golem.de/politik-recht/3070/patent-absurdity-dokumentarfilm.html

thanks Reichart - I was feeling a little too relaxed - that got the 
blood boiling

the concept of software patents in the US is, in practice, basically 
the same as nuclear weapons. you have to have them as a "defense" 
against other companies. it's something you keep there, so that other 
companies will think twice before attacking you.

I'm more for the guerillia tactics: Don't care about it, just release 
the apps in a way that it's not trackable who did them and build 
an indirect consulting business around it.

ah, but then it's simpler than that. just let the US lose all tech 
advantage in the software world. when they realize the problem they'll 
get rid of software patents. when products can be sold almost everywhere 
in the world except in the US... people will start to understand 
the issue.

yes, that tactics can work, except it is a problem if the EC succeeds 
to push the software patents down our throats too. Moreover, there 
already are some patents of this kind accepted by EPO - see e.g. 
http://eupat.ffii.org/10/03/bessen/, even though it is "against 
the letter and spirit of the written law"

also: http://www.nosoftwarepatents-award.com/

also http://eupat.ffii.org/

http://blog.laptopmag.com/wpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Mobile-Patent-Lawsuits.png

:-)

*somebody* is making money there...

http://www.osnews.com/story/23275/Adobe_Shows_Off_Flash_10_1_on_Android_Impresses

ouch
limewire all set to go bust!

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/05/major-copyright-defeat-tastes-sour-for-limewire.ars

Google releases preview of their "Native client" SDK - http://blog.chromium.org/2010/05/sneak-peek-at-native-client-sdk.html

Those ppl are just admitting, that the REBOL way was correct from 
the very beginning - to have "rich client", which can do stuff for 
you things directly on user's machine - no server, no html ... how 
funny ....

Right. Just need some seemless means of R3 interacting in the browser...back 
to plug-in?