World: r3wp

AdrianS, there is no difference.

One where it makes perfect sense is a sleep application, where I 
place the iPod on my bed and it passively registers motions I do 
throughout the night and then records them. Based on the motion it 
wakes me at the correct time in the morning. This requires no feedback 
to the display, so it makes good sense here.

I agree that on the current iPod (and other devices that have just 
this - like my ThinkPad), the usefulness of the accelerometer is 
debatable

well, if you keep saying that there is no difference, there's not 
much to discuss - since the whole point of the preceeding discussion 
is that the new functionality brought in by the processor and gyroscope 
is what makes a difference

There is no difference, because it's the fundamental principle of 
requiring shake, angle or motion gestures to use such a small device 
to change a state on the device itself that is wrong. I don't care 
how accurate the measuring of gestures is.

a viable example is the tilting to slide a list.  


on the iphone, the tilting is VERY slow to react cause its trying 
to guess the tilt based on acceleration and must be filtered.  so 
the lag is annoying.  Full body Motion capture has the same kind 
of problems with accelerator sensors.  with a gyro, the tilt isn't 
"guessed" its actual, so you can easily make it precise.

currently (and I keep emphasizing this), you can't even measure some 
of things this will allow

I agree with yout point Henrik, but I also think that most people 
use gestures as gimicks and haven't yet understood how to use them 
efectively.


I hate having to use two hands to quickly browse through contacts 
and pics.  I'd rather just tilt my phone and shake up& down slightly, 
like if I was letting sand (or cardboard cards) trickle down on a 
flat surface.


the gestures have to mimick real life or be very obvious (like turning 
the phone upside down).

yout = your

by "most people"  I mean developpers

one of the stupid gestures shown is using the tilt to select things... 
like a ball tilt game...   does the guy remember that ball tilting 
is quite hard in real-life?  that shoudn't be used at all.

Maxim, maybe it depends on the size of your hand and possibly a thicker 
iPhone, but I can browse photos, make calendar appointments, browse 
webpages, select music and type with one hand easily on the iPod. 
No gestures needed. I'd think I have average size hands.

Pinching is harder, though.

yeah, or more than one point touching

I have rather long fingers... I'm not saying I can't ... just that 
its awkwards to use one handed.   naturally, I'll always end up using 
it with the phone in my left hand and my right hand touching the 
surface.

I was wrong about pinching. It's actually quite easy if you practice. 
Just trying it now.

the other thing that it seems you're not seeing Henrik is that this 
would be particularly useful for handling actions across multiple 
apps where there is no simple cross app touch only interface defined

you can pinch one handed an iPod/iPhone? - gotta see that

thumbs don't have near the same mobility and speed as the other fingers, 
unless you only use rotation of the first knuckle. 


the momet you have to flex the thumb, it becomes slow.   which is 
why we'll naturall hold the phone laterally and browse using thumbs 
sideways... but doing so vertically isn't nearly as ergonomic.

AdrianS, and I think you're underestimating what it takes to learn 
and do these things in practice.

pinching one handed isn't hard... just not very ergonomic.

(even with large hands)

usually the thumb will stay put and only the index will move around, 
for example.

pinching while holding (not resting) the phone in one hand?

yes.

not resting on a table, I meant

yep.

Maxim, yes, when not moving the thumb it's easier.

talking about lousy UI

Adrian, have you ever used an iPhone?

its not about the UI, its about how the fingers work.... people implementing 
gestures often don't even look at their hands to realize how each 
finger has its own specific optimized movements.

use an iPod

the touch UI is quite fantastic. maybe that's why I fail to see how 
gestures will improve things.

what this tech offers is complementary to touch

just as this has only certain practical applications, so does touch

use the most appropriate UI for any context

right. the guy in the video chose really poor applications for gyro-based 
UI control.

for example, voice could be used to augment the motion sensing

I agree, some of the things shown were not very practical

but for myself, I see some real cool possibilities

voice for me could be useful as a replacement for typing, but not 
much else. you again have to remember a set of commands to manipulate 
a user interface. the intelligence here is still not Star Trek level, 
and I don't think it can be useful for more than dictation generally, 
before we get to that level.

I would think that you could do some pretty accurate distance measurements 
using a combination motion tracking and camera

one or two word voice commands (i.e. a limited grammar) is not hard 
to do and would just add to the kind of gesture filtering that can 
be done

what I meant by distance measurement is to calculate how far away 
something is

the iphone has usefull voice driven interface.  play "song tile" 
  call "contact name"  etc.

maxim, yeah, it doesn't work very well for me.

you do have to speak "computer" well   ;-)

http://www.osnews.com/story/23322/BREAKING_Google_Opens_VP8_Codec_Enables_it_on_YouTube

bye bye, H.264. This is how patent parazites as MPEG-LA loose their 
future oportunities ...

oh don't count this as done... H.264 is a better codec, and MPEG-LA 
will surely try to go to court with some patent infringement.


but hey, we've got google fighting it (which has some cash), so court 
case could be lost by MPEG-LA.