World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
Henrik 19-May-2010 [5003] | Adrian, have you ever used an iPhone? |
Maxim 19-May-2010 [5004] | its not about the UI, its about how the fingers work.... people implementing gestures often don't even look at their hands to realize how each finger has its own specific optimized movements. |
AdrianS 19-May-2010 [5005] | use an iPod |
Henrik 19-May-2010 [5006] | the touch UI is quite fantastic. maybe that's why I fail to see how gestures will improve things. |
AdrianS 19-May-2010 [5007x3] | what this tech offers is complementary to touch |
just as this has only certain practical applications, so does touch | |
use the most appropriate UI for any context | |
Henrik 19-May-2010 [5010] | right. the guy in the video chose really poor applications for gyro-based UI control. |
AdrianS 19-May-2010 [5011x3] | for example, voice could be used to augment the motion sensing |
I agree, some of the things shown were not very practical | |
but for myself, I see some real cool possibilities | |
Henrik 19-May-2010 [5014] | voice for me could be useful as a replacement for typing, but not much else. you again have to remember a set of commands to manipulate a user interface. the intelligence here is still not Star Trek level, and I don't think it can be useful for more than dictation generally, before we get to that level. |
AdrianS 19-May-2010 [5015x3] | I would think that you could do some pretty accurate distance measurements using a combination motion tracking and camera |
one or two word voice commands (i.e. a limited grammar) is not hard to do and would just add to the kind of gesture filtering that can be done | |
what I meant by distance measurement is to calculate how far away something is | |
Maxim 19-May-2010 [5018] | the iphone has usefull voice driven interface. play "song tile" call "contact name" etc. |
Henrik 19-May-2010 [5019] | maxim, yeah, it doesn't work very well for me. |
Maxim 19-May-2010 [5020] | you do have to speak "computer" well ;-) |
Pekr 19-May-2010 [5021x2] | http://www.osnews.com/story/23322/BREAKING_Google_Opens_VP8_Codec_Enables_it_on_YouTube |
bye bye, H.264. This is how patent parazites as MPEG-LA loose their future oportunities ... | |
Maxim 19-May-2010 [5023] | oh don't count this as done... H.264 is a better codec, and MPEG-LA will surely try to go to court with some patent infringement. but hey, we've got google fighting it (which has some cash), so court case could be lost by MPEG-LA. |
Henrik 19-May-2010 [5024] | if they don't, they at least deserve a kick in the groin. |
Ladislav 19-May-2010 [5025] | H.264 is a better codec - which criteria did you use to find this out? |
Maxim 19-May-2010 [5026] | its the latest codec to be standardized, and its the basis for all high-quality compression on DVDs and Blue-Ray. |
Henrik 19-May-2010 [5027] | http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377 A comparison. |
Maxim 19-May-2010 [5028] | overall conclusion of that very detailed analysis: VP8, as a spec, should be a bit better than H.264 Baseline Profile and VC-1. It’s not even close to competitive with H.264 Main or High Profile. If Google is willing to revise the spec, this can probably be improved. |
Pekr 19-May-2010 [5029x2] | http://videojs.com/- cross browser video html5 player, supporting VP8 |
Chrome Webstore .... https://chrome.google.com/webstore... now they steal our idea of rebrowser ..... | |
BudzinskiC 20-May-2010 [5031] | Google has been playing around with that idea for a while, kind of announced it a year ago actually in the Google Wave group because they needed a way to allow people to make money with robots and gadgets. Robots and gadgets are both web apps and Chrome OS only runs web apps. They would be stupid not to do this, they *need* an app store for web apps. |
Henrik 20-May-2010 [5032x3] | https://chrome.google.com/webstore This seems pretty interesting. |
Hmm... I didn't see Pekr's link, sorry. | |
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/05/20/1332214/German-High-Court-Declares-All-Software-Patentable?art_pos=2 | |
AdrianS 20-May-2010 [5035x2] | noooooooooooooooo! |
is the world moving backwards? | |
Pekr 20-May-2010 [5037] | http://www.osnews.com/story/23330/Google_Unveils_Android_2_2_Takes_Aim_at_Apple |
Graham 20-May-2010 [5038] | Nice .. but when will we get Rebol on Android?? |
Pekr 21-May-2010 [5039] | VP8 debunked - http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377 |
Robert 21-May-2010 [5040] | Patents: I can't belieft that our high court is doing this!! Normally it's a very serious and responsible instituation... |
AdrianS 21-May-2010 [5041] | This comment from Petr's link makes some good points: http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1658944&cid=32280004 One of them is that politicians come from the same schools/background as the lawyers, so what else can be expected? |
Pekr 21-May-2010 [5042] | LightSpark, the project that aims to create an LLVM-based Free Flash payer, has reached beta status - http://www.osnews.com/comments/23333 |
Carl 21-May-2010 [5043x2] | Designed from scratch after the official Flash documentation was released. |
Hopefully, the source can teach us a few things? | |
Janko 21-May-2010 [5045] | Robert: Are you talking about german court and sw patents. It was huge (alarming) news in my sphere :/ |
Robert 22-May-2010 [5046] | Janko, yes. This is really crazy as it was especiall hard in Germany to get a patent related to software things. |
BudzinskiC 22-May-2010 [5047] | This patent stuff really freaked me out at first but there seem to be ways to circumenvent it until (hopefully) the government kicks in and solves this mess. The BGH said software patents apply as soon as your software's design is influenced by the device it runs on, so if your software targets a virtual machine like Java it should be okay because then patents don't apply because no device influenced your software, you wrote it to run on software (the VM), not on a hardware device. That it runs on hardware is a mere coincidence but didn't influence you while writing the software. Could be the BGH will just revise their comment on this of course to also include virtual machines. Cross platform software could be okay too with this argumentation as long as you only write features that work on more than one device. So no iPhone specific stuff for example, but if the app runs without modification on an iPad, the iPhone and an iPod Touch it should be okay again, those are three completely different devices (computer, cell phone, music player) so you should be able to argue that you weren't influenced by them at all. You would argue instead that you were influenced by Cocoa Touch, which is software and not a device, so patents don't apply. This would also mean REBOL apps are okay, since your software is made to run in the REBOL interpreter and not on any specific device (unless you put some Mac specific calls in there but then you could argue you targeted the operating system which is software and not a device). If you can really get away with this kind of argumentation is a big question of course. The judge can decide on a whim if you're guilty or not, all the laws are open to interpretation for him. I read one comment on this that gives me some hope. The german government uses a lot of Linux and they spent a lot of money to train their workers to use Linux. With this decision by the BGH, Linux is suddenly patent hell, so it's in the government's best interest to kick in. Sadly, they could just say "patents don't apply to the government" and be done with it. |
Pekr 25-May-2010 [5048] | http://blog.laptopmag.com/nvidia-ceo-netbooks-and-tablets-to-meld-hints-at-tegra-powered-webos-devices |
btiffin 26-May-2010 [5049] | Meego 1.0 core and netbook user experience released http://meego.com/community/blogs/imad/2010/meego-v1.0-core-software-platform-netbook-user-experience-project-release |
Pekr 31-May-2010 [5050] | Czech server put prototype of iPhone 4G/HD under microscope, and found out, that the panel is not OLED, but IPS, resolution is 640x960, so that old apps will by probably scaled by system by using 2x2 pixels .... some photos here - http://iphonemania.mobilmania.cz/iPhone-HD-v-redakci-teste-se-na-fantasticky-displej |
Andreas 31-May-2010 [5051] | they could have found out that it's an IPS panel by simply reading apple's product description, no :) ? |
NickA 7-Jun-2010 [5052] | Have you seen Apple's name for the new iPhone OS: "iOS" !!! http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_gadg/ytech_gadg_tc2440 |
older newer | first last |