World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
Gabriele 2-May-2006 [533] | i disagree, the scariest things on this planet are humans. (they can be terrorists, they become old people eventually, and they even create robots.) |
Henrik 2-May-2006 [534] | I thought ignorant, powerful people would top that list? |
JaimeVargas 2-May-2006 [535] | I think educated people can still make bad decisions. For me the problem starts with the people that don't measure the consequences of their actions, however they move forward. Second by the ones that don't value life. |
james_nak 2-May-2006 [536] | I think we may surprise ourselves to discover just how far "normal" people will go under certain circumstances. |
Geomol 2-May-2006 [537] | It often go bad, when people don't think for themselves. And agreed, many lack the ability to see the consequences of their actions. Finally many can't distinguish between facts and opinions. Some things come down to facts, other things depend on the eyes seeing. |
Henrik 2-May-2006 [538] | http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=internetNews&storyID=2006-05-02T172703Z_01_N02271704_RTRIDST_0_OUKIN-UK-MICROSOFT-VISTA.XML <--- Vista likely to be delayed 3 more months. |
Sunanda 2-May-2006 [539] | <<Vista likely to be delayed 3 more months.>> Five year old mention of REBOL3.0: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/ml-display-thread.r?m=rmlGGJS |
PeterWood 2-May-2006 [540] | In which Carl stated "REBOL modules will be added for 3.0." |
[unknown: 9] 4-May-2006 [541] | Strange, but interesting: http://secretgeek.net/WSCG.asp |
Pekr 9-May-2006 [542x2] | a look at Symbian & UIQ Motorola 1000 SmartPhone - http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=14558 |
does anyone think, that they need Rebol for some apps? I can imagine IOS like product (Altissimo?), where users buy small applets from you, they can look-up another users, share data, etc. | |
[unknown: 9] 9-May-2006 [544] | Rebol is a PERFECT match for Cellphone aps. |
Robert 9-May-2006 [545] | Yes, and that since... 4 years? No further comment... |
Sunanda 9-May-2006 [546] | REBOL is a tiny download, but a very large memory footprint when running. I remember that was one reason for it never being ported to PDAs. Cellphones also have memory limitations -- both in maximum megs and underlying mapping models. Has the hardware curve caught up with REBOL's needs yet? |
Pekr 9-May-2006 [547x2] | hasn't Carl just blogged with "I want Rebol on my cell phone and I want it now" or something like that? |
we still haven't heard the strategy for opening-up rebol parts for community to help etc. though ... | |
Sunanda 9-May-2006 [549x2] | H blogged a couple of times about winCE being complete pants on a cellphone. And hinted that a port of REBOL to winCE is possible given time: http://www.rebol.net/article/0217.html |
H ==> He ==> Carl | |
Cyphre 10-May-2006 [551] | Sunanda. I believe Rebol3 will fit into the current HW specs of mobile devices. |
Pekr 10-May-2006 [552] | New version of GP32 handheld linux device on the horizon - http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/05/09/gp2x_linux_console_launch/ |
Henrik 10-May-2006 [553] | The Nintendo Wii controller looks ingenius in action. I wonder if there will be a homebrew scene for Wii... |
Pekr 11-May-2006 [554x2] | thru http://earl.strain.at/space/startI got to http://www.kx.com - has anyone heard about such database? |
MonetDB/X100 paper - http://www.cwi.nl/htbin/ins1/publications?request=pdf&key=ZuBoNeHe:DEBULL:05 | |
JaimeVargas 11-May-2006 [556] | I saw it mention in LtU, but beyond that I don't know anything about it. |
Volker 11-May-2006 [557] | Heard its a far descendant of APL, and fast. Found this: http://www.kx.com/news/in-the-news/pr-041228-vector.php |
Pekr 12-May-2006 [558x3] | So nowadays, View gets serious competition: |
Flash to jump beyond the browser arctile - simply put, they used browser to spread, now they can dominate the market, so they move away from the browser with Apollo - http://news.com.com/Flash+to+jump+beyond+the+browser/2100-1007_3-6071005.html?tag=nefd.lede | |
Ruby community to clone Rebol/View (AGG) - http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/browse_thread/thread/35c2f61d29e94550/28b32a50948920ba | |
JaimeVargas 12-May-2006 [561x2] | Cool. I have been playing lately with Ruby-on-Rails, I must confess that I really like Rails, it allows for very fast prototyping imho, even faster than rebol. I recommend reading "Agile Web Development with Rails" to anyone interested. |
If the build add the Rails framework to the Ruby/AGG backend. I think Ruby will have another big market gain. | |
BrianW 12-May-2006 [563] | Why is it that my favorite languages only get popular when they get fat and slow? :) |
Pekr 12-May-2006 [564x2] | Jaime - who cares of web development ... that is really good definition of Ruby vs Rebol usability - web apps :-) |
Good old Jaime adheres to hype :-) | |
Graham 12-May-2006 [566x3] | Actually that looks very interesting. |
Are they offering developers grants to help them develop PD software? | |
That message is however dated 2005. | |
Pekr 12-May-2006 [569x2] | dunno how they are organised. They apparently do get some money, then they announce possibility to gain some grants .... |
Cyphre did find some link to beta Ruby/AGG release, which one note of author, stating something like "Download beta release, but this is unexpectadly slow :-(" ... which could mean there is still a long way to go for them, and we can have REBOL 4.0 by that time ... | |
Graham 12-May-2006 [571x2] | It's good to have competition. |
Look what the prospect of Orca has brought us ... Rebol3! | |
Pekr 12-May-2006 [573x2] | graham - my reference was not to Ruby/AGG, which apparently can be a good product, but to statements like "rails .... even faster than rebol" - whish sounds, from someone who is interested in languages so much, like a plain nonsense, comparing language to framework ... |
are you sure Carl's motives were based upon Orca pressure? | |
Henrik 12-May-2006 [575] | I'm pretty sure that Carl has been thinking about Rebol3 since the release of Rebol2 :-) |
Graham 12-May-2006 [576x3] | Let me see now ... modules were announced shortly after R#? |
Timing is curious ... | |
And of course it is in RT's interest to kill off any impending clones, or make them irrelevant. | |
Pekr 12-May-2006 [579] | no matter what anyone can think, as for my limited skills to others - I prefer rebol because of Rebol and I can' understand nonsense like Ruby has rails, which is popular, it means Ruby is cool kind of attitude - Ruby is still Ruby ... and you like the programming language, or you don't ... and I like rebol .... :-) |
Henrik 12-May-2006 [580] | The most curious thing I remember Carl saying was that he said he would do it now if he had a million $. That was around the 2005 devcon. |
Pekr 12-May-2006 [581x2] | not ... as a long term amigan here, not really sure for modules ... modules were there long enough, no? :-) It was components ... big, colorfull announcemend, yada, yada ... removed later, when R# went to sleep :-)) |
Henrik - maybe he got his million? Before Devcon 2005, Carl told me, that he has got some investor ... not sure how it evolved though ... | |
older newer | first last |