World: r3wp

I thought ignorant, powerful people would top that list?

I think educated  people can still make bad decisions. For me the 
problem starts with the people that don't measure the consequences 
of their actions, however they move forward. Second by the ones that 
don't value life.

I think we may surprise ourselves to discover just how far "normal" 
people will go under certain circumstances.

It often go bad, when people don't think for themselves. And agreed, 
many lack the ability to see the consequences of their actions. Finally 
many can't distinguish between facts and opinions. Some things come 
down to facts, other things depend on the eyes seeing.

http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=internetNews&storyID=2006-05-02T172703Z_01_N02271704_RTRIDST_0_OUKIN-UK-MICROSOFT-VISTA.XML
<--- Vista likely to be delayed 3 more months.

<<Vista likely to be delayed 3 more months.>>
Five year old mention of REBOL3.0:

http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/ml-display-thread.r?m=rmlGGJS

In which Carl stated "REBOL modules will be added for 3.0."

Strange, but interesting: http://secretgeek.net/WSCG.asp

a look at Symbian & UIQ Motorola 1000 SmartPhone - http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=14558

does anyone think, that they need Rebol for some apps? I can imagine 
IOS like product (Altissimo?), where users buy small applets from 
you, they can look-up another users, share data, etc.

Rebol is a PERFECT match for Cellphone aps.

Yes, and that since... 4 years? No further comment...

REBOL is a tiny download, but a very large memory footprint when 
running.
I remember that was one reason for it never being ported to PDAs.

Cellphones also have memory limitations -- both in maximum megs and 
underlying mapping models.
Has the hardware curve caught up with REBOL's needs yet?

hasn't Carl just blogged with "I want Rebol on my cell phone and 
I want it now" or something like that?

we still haven't heard the strategy for opening-up rebol parts for 
community to help etc. though ...

H blogged a couple of times about winCE being complete pants on a 
cellphone.
And hinted that a port of REBOL to winCE is possible given time:
http://www.rebol.net/article/0217.html

H ==> He ==> Carl

Sunanda. I believe Rebol3 will fit into the current HW specs of mobile 
devices.

New version of GP32 handheld linux device on the horizon - http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/05/09/gp2x_linux_console_launch/

The Nintendo Wii controller looks ingenius in action. I wonder if 
there will be a homebrew scene for Wii...

thru http://earl.strain.at/space/startI got to http://www.kx.com
- has anyone heard about such database?

MonetDB/X100 paper - http://www.cwi.nl/htbin/ins1/publications?request=pdf&key=ZuBoNeHe:DEBULL:05

I saw it mention in LtU, but beyond that I don't know anything about 
it.

Heard its a far descendant of APL, and fast. Found this: http://www.kx.com/news/in-the-news/pr-041228-vector.php

So nowadays, View gets serious competition:

Flash to jump beyond the browser arctile - simply put, they used 
browser to spread, now they can dominate the market, so they move 
away from the browser with Apollo - http://news.com.com/Flash+to+jump+beyond+the+browser/2100-1007_3-6071005.html?tag=nefd.lede

Ruby community to clone Rebol/View (AGG) - http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/browse_thread/thread/35c2f61d29e94550/28b32a50948920ba

Cool. I have been playing lately with Ruby-on-Rails, I must confess 
that I really like Rails, it allows for very fast prototyping imho, 
even faster than rebol. I recommend reading "Agile Web Development 
with Rails" to anyone interested.

If the build add the Rails framework to the  Ruby/AGG backend. I 
think Ruby will have another big market gain.

Why is it that my favorite languages only get popular when they get 
fat and slow? :)

Jaime - who cares of web development ... that is really good definition 
of Ruby vs Rebol usability - web apps :-)

Good old Jaime adheres to hype :-)

Actually that looks very interesting.

Are they offering developers grants to help them develop PD software?

That message is however dated 2005.

dunno how they are organised. They apparently do get some money, 
then they announce possibility to gain some grants ....

Cyphre did find some link to beta Ruby/AGG release, which one note 
of author, stating something like "Download beta release, but this 
is unexpectadly slow :-(" ... which could mean there is still a long 
way to go for them, and we can have REBOL 4.0 by that time ...

It's good to have competition.

Look what the prospect of Orca has brought us ... Rebol3!

graham - my reference was not to Ruby/AGG, which apparently can be 
a good product, but to statements like "rails .... even faster than 
rebol" - whish sounds, from someone who is interested in languages 
so much, like a plain nonsense, comparing language to framework ...

are you sure Carl's motives were based upon Orca pressure?

I'm pretty sure that Carl has been thinking about Rebol3 since the 
release of Rebol2 :-)

Let me see now ... modules were announced shortly after R#?

Timing is curious ...

And of course it is in RT's interest to kill off any impending clones, 
or make them irrelevant.

no matter what anyone can think, as for my limited skills to others 
- I prefer rebol because of Rebol and I can' understand nonsense 
like Ruby has rails, which is popular, it means Ruby is cool kind 
of attitude - Ruby is still Ruby ... and you like the programming 
language, or you don't ... and I like rebol .... :-)

The most curious thing I remember Carl saying was that he said he 
would do it now if he had a million $. That was around the 2005 devcon.

not ... as a long term amigan here, not really sure for modules ... 
modules were there long enough, no? :-) It was components ... big, 
colorfull announcemend, yada, yada ... removed later, when R# went 
to sleep :-))

Henrik - maybe he got his million? Before Devcon 2005, Carl told 
me, that he has got some investor ... not sure how it evolved though 
...

So, we need to encourage Orca is we want to see Rebol 3 progress