r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Tech News] Interesting technology

Pekr
22-Dec-2010
[5452]
http://www.osnews.com/story/24158/Bloomberg_Windows_Coming_to_ARM
Will
27-Dec-2010
[5453]
http://events.ccc.de/congress/2010/wiki/Documentationlive streams 
from 3C27
Henrik
29-Dec-2010
[5454]
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1934443/french-politicians-tax-tablets-running-windows

French politicians want to tax tablets for not running Windows
Oldes
29-Dec-2010
[5455]
Is this legal?
Henrik
29-Dec-2010
[5456]
They can probably make it legal.
Oldes
29-Dec-2010
[5457x2]
btw.. what does it meams "French politicians"? I don't believe that 
all of them.
I think it is against the competition law.
Henrik
29-Dec-2010
[5459]
It takes 1-2 uninformed politicians to make headlines, so it may 
not be as bad as it seems, but it's seems the desire for categorizing 
and quantifying software through law making won't end any time soon.
BrianH
29-Dec-2010
[5460]
I don't get why they exclude "computers" from the piracy tax. Most 
pirates use computers running Windows, same as most computer users.
Steeve
29-Dec-2010
[5461]
Do not look for logical reason, they simply are politicians, who 
search for any pretext to increase taxes
BrianH
29-Dec-2010
[5462]
Isn't this tax supposed to compensate musicians?
Steeve
29-Dec-2010
[5463]
It is
Henrik
29-Dec-2010
[5464]
On the surface, yes. Deeper down, most are not compensated.
Steeve
29-Dec-2010
[5465x2]
But the stupidity lies in  what they think is a computer is. 
- An engine which runs windows
When it comes at stupidity, our politicians are not half way.
French touch !
BrianH
29-Dec-2010
[5467]
I really don't mind that tax in principle, but only if it works to 
compensate musicians, not beaurocrats. And includes the computers 
as well, or at least any device for which the MP3 patents have been 
paid.
GrahamC
29-Dec-2010
[5468x3]
why don't they just tax everyone and you can get a tax rebate if 
you can prove you're deaf and blind ?
face it, you're only got one pair of those sense organs, and it doesn't 
seem to be fair to be taxed twice if you own two mp3 players
Or, the french govt could use profiling ... and tax those who fit 
the profile
Steeve
29-Dec-2010
[5471]
The tax is related to the size of the memory storage.
Every device with memory could be taxed, it's the idea.
GrahamC
29-Dec-2010
[5472]
time for another revolution ... storm the bastille
Steeve
29-Dec-2010
[5473]
Like Brian said, the tax principle is not the real problem. 

The problem is that the final cost becomes way too large for some 
devices.
Tax added on already existing  taxes.
GrahamC
29-Dec-2010
[5474x4]
remove copyright on music .. and get musicians to get a grant from 
general taxation
make them servants of the state :)
It's simply crazy to tax devices
In the past, everyone here had to pay for a TV license ... and we 
had these vans patrolling the streets trying to pick up unlicensed 
TV sets
Steeve
29-Dec-2010
[5478]
We still have it here
GrahamC
29-Dec-2010
[5479x2]
Now the broadcasters get their fees from advertizing
What??  still pay tv license fees?
Steeve
29-Dec-2010
[5481]
yeah and those who can receive TV via internet pay it as well
GrahamC
29-Dec-2010
[5482x3]
No Freeview digital broadcasts ?
What about satellites?
Well, you must live in a very repressive state!!
Steeve
29-Dec-2010
[5485]
We have public and private networks, We pay tax because of the public 
ones.
Henrik
29-Dec-2010
[5486]
We have that here too and the fee is climbing every year and is the 
same amount for students and billionaires. The rule is that as soon 
as you have a device that can receive radio or TV signals (doesn't 
matter if you can actually watch TV or hear radio), you have to pay. 
Also our internet connections are taxed this way. If you have more 
than a 256 kbit connection, you have to pay.
GrahamC
29-Dec-2010
[5487x5]
OMG
How pitiful
out public networks were privatised
out = our
not a function of govt to run tv stations
Henrik
29-Dec-2010
[5492]
I'd rather that we had to pay this as an actual tax, so no money 
would be spent on controlling whether we had a TV, but it's done 
as a separate fee that you can elect not to pay, once you prove that 
you don't have a TV, radio, internet connection or access to any 
of that from your home.
GrahamC
29-Dec-2010
[5493]
so cellphones are taxed for tv, radio and internet?
Henrik
29-Dec-2010
[5494]
it's not a tax for internet access, but a tax for the ability to 
access webstreams of national TV.
GrahamC
29-Dec-2010
[5495]
I suspect your countries have large bureaucracies
Henrik
29-Dec-2010
[5496x2]
anyone are taxed, even businesses and also if you run an internet 
connection to a bikeshed for a webcam.
Denmark has the world's largest bureaucracy with close to, around 
30-40% of the working population being publicly employed (don't know 
the exact figure).
GrahamC
29-Dec-2010
[5498]
Why are your cartoonists drawing pictures of Mohammed when there's 
a lot more wrong with your own country!!
Steeve
29-Dec-2010
[5499]
Honestly I prefer to live in countries like Denmark or France instead 
of USA or England. 

You feel the difference when you lost your employment or have a big 
decease.
Henrik
29-Dec-2010
[5500]
Mohammed drawings is really a small problem. There are some things 
we like very much, like having free hospitals. What we don't like 
so much is that the public sector is growing in the wrong way. It's 
adding personnel for doing controls, paperwork, managing silly rules 
and making sure people uphold stupid laws, rather than increasing 
productivity. If it did, it would be OK. It's really about what we 
get for our tax money, and it's not enough. Our government is trying 
to control us into the ground.
GrahamC
29-Dec-2010
[5501]
if 50% of the country works for the govt, of course it makes sense 
to increase that as it increases your vote