r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Tech News] Interesting technology

Henrik
4-Feb-2011
[5663]
http://bodybrowser.googlelabs.com/

Browse the human body using WebGL.
AdrianS
4-Feb-2011
[5664]
wow - that's amazing stuff
Pekr
7-Feb-2011
[5665]
Nokia experiments with the Bubble interface - IIRC, it is QML based 
(Qt's VID inspired declarative aproach, second one, after JavaFX)


http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/nokia-experiments-with-bubbles-interface-on-symbian-cell-phones-2011024/


Just not sure I want to chase bubble around to get some action done 
:-)
TomBon
7-Feb-2011
[5666]
a good design characterizing itself by immediate function transparency.
this is....well...what is it?
Henrik
7-Feb-2011
[5667]
one quick improvement would be to make the bubbles not move.
Reichart
7-Feb-2011
[5668]
LOL!

(that is all I can say about the bubbles)


oh wait..........now the "LOL" has floated down here in the message.......whoa..............it 
floated over here "LOL".

LOL...
Andreas
7-Feb-2011
[5669]
debian 6.0 "squeeze" released
http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110205a
GrahamC
9-Feb-2011
[5670x2]
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/hps-touchpad-tablet-smartphones-put-webos-back-into-the-game/44636?tag=nl.e589

HP's impressive tablet using WebOS
snapdragon I presume is an Arm processor
Pekr
10-Feb-2011
[5672]
Snapdragon is Qualcom's ARM based CPU/chipset. OMAP is Texas Instruments. 
Samsung has its own, nVidia has Tegra, Broadcom is another big one 
I know. Full list of licensees can be seen here:

http://www.arm.com/products/processors/licensees.php
GrahamC
10-Feb-2011
[5673x2]
If the HP's WebOs takes off .. maybe we don't need to port to Android 
:)
Isn't WebOS a Linux variant?
Ashley
10-Feb-2011
[5675]
Yes, "a proprietary mobile operating system running on the Linux 
kernel, initially developed by Palm and purchased by Hewlett Packard 
(HP) in 2010."
BrianH
10-Feb-2011
[5676]
We need an Android port. Otherwise, how would I run R3 on my phone?
Robert
10-Feb-2011
[5677]
I'm convinced that HP will succeed to fail with WebOS. Wrong CEO 
and a lot of HP products are mostly crap.
BrianH
10-Feb-2011
[5678]
HP has been succeeding with crappy products for years, so they might 
succeed with this. Too big to fail completely.
GrahamC
10-Feb-2011
[5679x3]
HP's slate runs flash .. you need flash to view porn.  Ergo, this 
slate will sell.
Furthermore, HP has been giving away slates free with their printers 
.. as printer control devices.
They can continue to do that for their servers
Henrik
10-Feb-2011
[5682]
Well, at least they just straight up copy the iPad now. I'm sure 
they only announce now, because the iPad is about to be updated.
Pekr
10-Feb-2011
[5683]
I never liked HP, dunno why :-) I worst thing is, I have no reason 
to hate them :-) But - in big corporate world, I grew-up in IBM land. 
IBM was "frienlie", because of PowerPC = Amiga :-) HP killed Compaq, 
which I liked more. Pity HTC had not enough of money to buy Palm. 
I am not also sure I like the fact that so cool OS as QNX is, is 
owned by RIM. We have BBs here, and I will have one in few months 
too, but BB is being regarded mostly a corporate cell phone.
Henrik
10-Feb-2011
[5684]
HP was once an engineering company, but no more.
Pekr
10-Feb-2011
[5685x2]
Oh, and HP printers are forbidden in my home, and PC store, unless 
customer really wants HP :-) We use Canons for ink printers. HP killed 
my trust with 300 MB+ drivers crap
Henrik - yes, IBM is an engineering company even less? :-( They sold 
their PC business to LENOVO. PowerPC is mostly in hands of Freescale 
(Motorola). And I doubt IBM will be contracted once again for the 
next gen consoles (if there will be any such devices in future).
Henrik
10-Feb-2011
[5687]
I'm in doubt as to what hardware is reliable nowadays. The brands 
that used to be reliable are now reduced to the same quality as everyone 
else.
Kaj
10-Feb-2011
[5688]
Competitive pressure. To be honest, this drive to mediocrity is possible 
because the low quality products have also moved to average. Quality 
is not distinctive enough anymore
Reichart
10-Feb-2011
[5689]
It is interesting watching someone REALLY use a tablet for "work". 
 One of my lawyers has had an iPad for a while.  I have been telling 
him he can use it with Qtask in a really powerful way, and he finally 
took the 3 minutes that was required to make his life easier.  We 
installed http://readdle.com/(I have been talking to the lead programmer 
for about a year now), and signed into Qtask with it.


Now he can see all his matters, download (and they made it about 
x4 faster than Windows), and now mark up docs, save to Qtask through 
WebDAV.

I personally sitll have no use for a tablet, and I have an iPad which 
I'm about to sell because I simply don't use it.


For me to really use a Tablet I want forward/backwards camera,  10+ 
battery life, G3 and G4 wireless,  an OS that allows me to get to 
the files and Flash.  

(in fact, I''m reminded of how much I hate the iPad and my iPhone 
again LOL).
Pekr
10-Feb-2011
[5690x2]
Reichart - no problem with upcoming tablet releases no? Mororola 
Xoom, Samsung Galaxy Tab, or even HP's offerings? Not to mention 
RIM QNX based PlayBook?
And I think iPad2 will add cams too, or so I remember I read somewhere 
...
DideC
10-Feb-2011
[5692]
Yeah Ipad2 will be a "larger iPhone4", so with the 2 cameras.
Reichart
10-Feb-2011
[5693]
Yeah, I "done" with iPhone.  It is a GREAT little device for most 
people though.
I'm going Andriod all the way until proven otherwise.
GrahamC
10-Feb-2011
[5694]
What's great about the iPad is that it has shown HP and the others 
that engineering and innovation is important, and one should not 
bet the farm on Microsoft.
Reichart
10-Feb-2011
[5695]
Agreed.
BrianH
10-Feb-2011
[5696]
The main thing I like about WebOS and WP7 as opposed to Android is 
that they don't copy iOS where it counts: the UI. Both have different 
UI models with real advantages over the iOS/Android model.
Izkata
10-Feb-2011
[5697]
Although in Android, home screens are replaceable, which is its advantage 
in that area - some of the more unusual ones are SweeterHome (which 
I use), SlideScreen, *Spark, and Windows Phone (which just attempts 
to copy Windows Phone 7)
Pekr
11-Feb-2011
[5698]
So it is official - Nokia partners with Microsoft -no answers to 
what happens to Symbian/MeeGo strategy yet though:


http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/nokia-and-microsoft-enter-strategic-alliance-on-windows-phone-b/
GrahamC
11-Feb-2011
[5699x2]

There are other mobile ecosystems. We will disrupt them. There will 
be challenges. We will overcome them. Success requires speed. We 
will be swift. Together, we see the opportunity, and we have the 
will, the resources and the drive to succeed.""
Pity we don't have that same drive ...
Pekr
11-Feb-2011
[5701x2]
We don't have money :-)
And everything is about money, remember. If someone would sponsor 
Carl to work fulltime R3, the situation would be different.
GrahamC
11-Feb-2011
[5703x2]
So what are the options?
BTW, how''s the port of Carl's demo going?
Pekr
11-Feb-2011
[5705x3]
There are no options. BrianH constantly claims, that we have many 
things in hands, e.g. re Android. I will believe it, once I will 
see r3.dll downloadable for ARM, or it is only vapor.
We should not also forget the driving force, which Carl once was. 
Even if Carl would release Android compatible dll, it might not be 
enough, if he does not show to the outer world, that R3 development 
is vital. And not updating twitter since November, ditto for blogs, 
R3 Chat (few messages here or there does not hide the facts) speaks 
for itself ...
Re demo - for different channel, but - basic windowing is working, 
few screens too. But it can't be ported 1:1, due to some architectural 
changes.
GrahamC
11-Feb-2011
[5708]
Is anyone in contact with him?
Ladislav
11-Feb-2011
[5709]
BrianH constantly claims, that we have many things in hands, e.g. 
re Android.

 - this looks like a slight misunderstanding to me. Perhaps, by saying 
 "we have many things in hands" he did not mean the same as you saying 
 "we have many things in hands"?
GrahamC
11-Feb-2011
[5710]
Does he mean that many things are being worked on concurrently?
Ladislav
11-Feb-2011
[5711]
I do not think so.
GrahamC
11-Feb-2011
[5712]
Does he mean that there is too much work to do?