World: r3wp

We won't know, as the state of development is still in understanding 
the physics and there is no public device that has worked for longer 
than a few milliseconds. After that, there are still engineering 
issues to overcome to build a production device. The researchers 
last said that the first real device could be in operation within 
5-10 years, which still is 50 years before ITER.


As far as I can tell, LENR is further ahead. But from what I can 
see, they are not in direct competition with eachother and there 
is a need for real table-top fusion.

I'm not sure what the maximum output from the Rossi process can be, 
but from what I've been reading it can actually produce much higher 
output than what is planned for the initial plant. For now, it is 
being limited it in order to have it operate in a safe range. The 
demonstration done in January showed about 12-15kW. It seems it can 
be self sustaining, but that might come after the theory behind the 
process is understood. As it is, it is a controllable process that 
can generate a known amount of energy given a set of operating parameters.

to clarify, the Jan demo showed that output from one unit of about 
1 litre capacity

Now that I looked over the wikipedia article on Polywell, I remember 
coming across it a few years back - I watched the Google talk that 
Bussard gave - but it fell off my radar when not much seemed to happen 
around the process.

I like working experiments which look like this:


http://pesn.com/2011/02/22/9501770_Rossi_cold_fusion_reactor_achieves_15_kW_for_18_hours/


it means we'll be able to build time-travelling deLoreans   ourselves 
  :-)

the thing I like about this experiment, is that they seem to be doing 
all they can to avoid calling it a "cold fusion" device... probably 
to limit the media circus act.

I don't understand the need for patenting the device, but I may not 
have the whole story.

Rossi is an engineer - he's spent a good amount of his life on this 
and lots of his own finances - up until now, it's been out of his 
pocket. Why doesn't it seem reasonable to want to profit from something 
like this?

the best discussion on this subject is on the vortex list. If the 
subject is of interest, start around mid-January when the news broke 
and work forwards. You'll find lots of very qualified people discussing 
Rossi. My take from what I've read is that this isn't a scam - there's 
been lots of precedent over the last two decades. Rossi has finally 
gotten a repeatable, consistent process, that's all.

http://www.mail-archive.com/[vortex-l-:-eskimo-:-com]

I'm wondering why he isn't telling how it's working. If he want to 
protect it, he has to file a patent, which makes the thing public 
anyway.

Also, the many comments on Rossi's blog (look at the Jan conference 
post with 825 comments, in particular), The Journal of Nuclear Physics, 
are telling. There's lots there to read between the lines.

he has filed for a patent, but there's been issues as the patent 
application is way too vague

the main IP he's trying to protect is in the composition of the catayst 
he uses along with the main ingredients of the reaction, regular 
hydrogen and nickel

the post for the Jan conference is here. Start at page 1 and work 
forward and you'll get a very good sense for how this whole thing 
is being perceived

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360#comments

He says, he's already heating one building using this method. If 
it were to be that he was to cover his investments, I would probably 
rather try to have it installed in dozens of buildings, by selling 
the device to select people. If he's trying to make millions beyond 
his investments by completely preventing other people from building 
it, I would not find that particularly noble.

Licensing

Henrik, in most cases that I know of patents do not allow you to 
"prevent" other people from benefiting from your inventions, it forces 
them to license the invention from you

and usually, the terms have to be "reasonable"

he has had a prototype unit (about 10kW if I recall) heating a building 
for about a year prior to the public announcement. The plant(s) (there 
will be one in Greece and one somewhere else, I think) coming this 
year, hopefully, will be the validation of the process everyone is 
demanding. If you read at the above links, you'll see that his intent 
isn't to stop the technology from being used by as many people as 
possible.

Any information about the costs?

yes, at the above links

by what I've seen, he wants this tech to be licenced as much as possible 
... I've read that he admits he must "give back to the americans 
who allowed him to do his research"


his own govt sent him to jail on previous "greener" energy attempts... 
which is downright imbecile.

the initial cost of the energy is supposed to be around one US cent/kWh

And no VCs jumped on the wagon yet? Can't believe it.

Robert, production is ~ 0.01/kwh   so very cheap...   and the minimal 
size is the actual device we see... 50x50x100 cm...  this is very 
cool... it means we could actually see "home-sized" units in time.

he's not looking for investment - other than for people looking to 
build plants

I would know a dozend companies that would use it immediatly.

I guess at a few million that would ;-)

production for units is 2011, with first shipments by year's end.... 
I mean... this is major.  its not "future" tech...

 its possibly the biggest energy revolution of the century, and it 
 went totally under the radar.

I would install it tomorrow, if I could.

here's an interesting interview with Dr. Edmund Storms (pretty big 
name in the field) on Rossi


http://coldfusionnow.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/edmund-storms-on-the-rossi-device-there-will-be-a-stampede/

me too, I'd install a unit for myself and my neighbor. with a closed, 
permanent loop for heating and cooling.

so far, his intent is to get it into industrial applications since 
licensing for that is a lot less prohibitive than for domestic use

but once the secret sause is out, I can't see how you won't be able 
to make this for yourself

sauce, I meant

also, the current machine is prohibitively "under performing" because 
by his own account... they have no clue what (rather why) its actually 
working.  so they are using extremely safe levels of operation which 
have a zero chance of becoming dangerous.   

they are still trying to provide the theory behind the discovery.


the current demonstrations provide a ratio of output of about 6-7 
times output energy wrt input.   I've read that they did tests up 
to 400:1, at which point explosions always occur... but by his own 
account, they will be able to significantly improve the "reactor" 
in the next years, when they start understanding it more.


operationally safe levels could be a lot higher today, given a different 
environment in which they build the reactor so I expect tha commercial 
products will double output within a very short period of time.

for now, getting the refined nickel dust will probably be the problem 
for "DIY" applications.  its extremely toxic, so its probably not 
commonlly available.

the sad thing is the Pons-Fleischman debacle hadn't happened (poor 
guys basically cut their careers short as a result), the filed could 
have been at this stage in the early 90's - with proper funding for 
research

meanwhile - we've kept on crapping on the planet, and even now, with 
the stuff happening in Japan, plans are underway in different parts 
of the world to move ahead with new nuclear fission reactors

above: filed -> field

the world is just waiting for a way to make energy without the requirement 
of special geographical resources.   this might very well be it. 
  nickel is a pretty abundant resource and there are mines all over 
the world.

plus, this system requires very little of the actual ore to work 
for months  (1kg/6 months) for the system they demoed.

and well, I hope there will never be a shortage of hydrogen  ;-)

I'm pretty sure that once the process is understood, other materials 
will be usable - at least that's what others seem to imply

I wonder what global upheaval this will lead to as economies adjust 
to account for this. Tremendous changes ahead - 2012? :-)

if, within a decade, it has be proven that the device is as safe 
as traditional oil furnaces are (we all accept that we have a bomb 
in our houses... so I don't see this as being any more dangerous).


I'd say that we are talking about a shift in the need for huge powerplants, 
in the long run.  if, I can use a kg of nickel for a few hundred 
bucks, to heat/cool my house and its water for a few years... why 
would I even consider using electricity/oil/gaz instead?

if everyone can basically cut his major energy costs by 90%, that 
means a sizeable reduction in grid energy requirements.

and reduced dependency on fossil fuels as well.

my fear is that the "nuclear" aspect of this process, especially 
at this time, will cause alarmists who don't know the difference 
between fission and fusion to oppose it

Isn't there some radiation in all nuclear processes?