r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[#Boron] Open Source REBOL Clone

Anton
13-Jul-2006
[407]
I want the code to be open so there's no limit to my understanding 
of it.
Kaj
13-Jul-2006
[408]
Is it a hobby for you, too, or anything else?
Pekr
13-Jul-2006
[409]
I don't support GPL in any way, that is a bitch license. LGPL I don't 
know about. But if RT releases some parts, I hope those are BSD. 
And if Orca can serve for REBOL back, that is a strange situation 
to have ....
Kaj
13-Jul-2006
[410]
I guess you just use GPL applications ;-)
Pekr
13-Jul-2006
[411]
Orca can= Orca can't
Henrik
13-Jul-2006
[412]
Am I the only one who use Rebol professionally full time?
Kaj
13-Jul-2006
[413]
Nope
Pekr
13-Jul-2006
[414]
I use, but I do not link to them probably? If GPL means I have to 
release ALL my app code, even the code COMPLETLY irrelevant to the 
GPL stuff I linked too, then it sucks big way. I don't hesitate to 
release any improvements/changes produced by developer to the GPL 
part in question, but not the whole app.
Anton
13-Jul-2006
[415]
It's more of a religion for me, I guess.
Pekr
13-Jul-2006
[416]
business should be allowed ... and to allow business, you should 
not push anyone to unwanted/unrelated actions ....
Kaj
13-Jul-2006
[417]
I guess that's why IBM likes GPL so much...
Anton
13-Jul-2006
[418x2]
Pekr, relax. That's ground covered by Rebol.
Maybe someone else will come along with a BSD rebol clone one day, 
but Rebol and Orca being at opposite ends of an axis is not a bad 
situation. Nicely balanced.
Pekr
13-Jul-2006
[420]
OK, should relax probably. It is just, it seems a bit contraproductive 
to me, which is a pity .... because if RT could use some good things, 
maybe they would decide to open some of theirs ones, as e.g. Console, 
etc., but it is a pity, the way for cooperation is ... nearly impossible 
....
Kaj
13-Jul-2006
[421]
If they release BSD code, it can go into Orca :-)
Anton
13-Jul-2006
[422]
They work for and against each other in different ways. If it is 
changed from LGPL to BSD then there will be other restrictions, but 
also other advantages.
Kaj
13-Jul-2006
[423]
Exactly
Pekr
13-Jul-2006
[424]
Anton - well, I am probably not good at all at licensing stuff ... 
what restrictions there could be with BSD license?
Anton
13-Jul-2006
[425]
Alright, I'd better get back to coding...
Kaj
13-Jul-2006
[426x2]
Orca coding?
Remember the AltME world. World name: Orca, guest account: guest, 
guest password: guest
JaimeVargas
13-Jul-2006
[428x7]
REBOL ==> Orca ==> REVOLT
BSD is compatible with LGPL
Commercial is compatible with LGPL
Only enforcement of LGPL is that if you change the core the you need 
to post changes.
So you modify some LGPL code your changes need to be opened. But 
if you just link to it, your code stays yours.
Advantage, nobody can stop the REVOLT.
But anyone can take advantage of it.
Kaj
13-Jul-2006
[435]
If you link to LGPL, you also have to publish your binary objects
JaimeVargas
13-Jul-2006
[436]
Don't follow that implication, sharing binaries doesn't hurt anyone 
or force anything.
Kaj
13-Jul-2006
[437]
It probably makes it a lot easier to reverse engineer your code. 
That may be an objection of RT
JaimeVargas
13-Jul-2006
[438x2]
Nah.
*Jaime* cloack again
Anton
13-Jul-2006
[440x5]
Jaime, an advantage to OpenRebol is that we don't have to go through 
changing all the code that looks like this:

#define orResult(t,v) \
    orSetTF(a1, t); \
    a1->index = v;

#define orResultCopy(v)     orCopyV(a1,v)

#define orResultSeries(t,w,idx) \
    orSetTF(a1, t); \
    orSetSeries(a1,w,idx)

#define orResultSTRING(i)   orResultSeries(OT_STRING,i,0)
#define orResultFILE(i)     orResultSeries(OT_FILE,i,0)
#define orResultBLOCK(i)    orResultSeries(OT_BLOCK,i,0)
#define orResultBINARY(i)   orResultSeries(OT_BINARY,i,0)
#define orResultNONE        orResult(OT_NONE,0)
etc.. etc...

All those "or" prefixes may refer equally to "ORca" or to "OpenRebol" 
 :)
Anyway, it's hardly a revolt, is it ?
I think it's a revolting name :)
Kaj, just reading Orca code for now, no creation happening yet :)
Kaj
13-Jul-2006
[445]
Same here
Anton
14-Jul-2006
[446]
Anyone with any experience with Jabber clients ? I just tried using 
Psi to create an account on jabber.org without much luck. (a possible 
problem with certificate and unresolved host error.)
Volker
14-Jul-2006
[447x2]
Do you have a gmail-account?
gaim registers without problems
Kaj
14-Jul-2006
[449]
I collected some links for Orca's scattered resources in the Orca 
world and wrote a how-to for compiling it
JaimeVargas
14-Jul-2006
[450]
Could you please add the compiling instructions to  the trac wiki?
Kaj
14-Jul-2006
[451]
I'd prefer not to do double work. Besides, there not general instructions, 
but alternate instructions for compiling with my Builder tool. Not 
generic enough for the wiki, I think, unless they would prove very 
popular
JaimeVargas
14-Jul-2006
[452]
Ok. Your call.
Kaj
14-Jul-2006
[453]
I'm trying to bring some added value
Joe
16-Jul-2006
[454]
Does Orca have SWIG bindings ?
Anton
16-Jul-2006
[455]
Not that I've noticed. But I am not fully immersed in Orca yet.
Kaj
16-Jul-2006
[456]
No, and I'm not at all sure SWIG bindings would be the best solution 
to interfacing with external libraries, for Orca